1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

1

Description:

Well-defined sampling instant (asserted by clock rising/falling edge) ... Sharp clock edge and small Vin mitigate the delay variation. 24 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: yunc2
Category:
Tags: edge

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 1


1
Sample-and-Hold
2
ZOH vs. Track-and-Hold (T/H)
  • Zero acquisition time
  • Infinite bandwidth
  • Not realistic
  • T/2 acquisition time
  • Finite bandwidth
  • Practical

3
A Simple T/H (Top-Plate Sampling)
  • MOS technology is naturally suitable for
    implementing T/H
  • The lowpass SC network determines the tracking
    bandwidth
  • Non-idealities signal-dependent Ron, charge
    injection, aperture, etc.

4
Tracking Bandwidth (TBW)
  • Tracking bandwidth determines how promptly Vo can
    follow Vi
  • Typically TBW is many times greater than the max
    signal bandwidth
  • Whats wrong with the concept of linear
    filtering if Ron is constant?

5
Dispersion
  • Magnitude response
  • Non-uniform phase delay
  • Non-uniform group delay

6
Dispersion
  • Waveform is not very sensitive to the lowpass
    magnitude response as long as the signal
    bandwidth is on the order of TBW
  • Waveform distortion is mainly due to non-uniform
    phase and group delays

7
Signal-Dependent Ron
  • Signal-dependent Ron ? signal-dependent TBW ?
    extra waveform distortion
  • Neither signal-dependent Ron nor dispersion is of
    concern if TBW is
  • sufficiently large (gtgt fin, depending on the
    target accuracy)

8
Ideal T/H
  • Sufficient tracking bandwidth ? negligible
    tracking error
  • Well-defined sampling instant (asserted by clock
    rising/falling edge)
  • Zero track-mode and hold-mode offset errors

9
T/H Errors (Track Mode)
  • Finite tracking bandwidth ? tracking error, T/H
    memory
  • Track-mode offset, gain error, and nonlinearity

10
Acquisition Time (tacq)
Short L, thin tox, large W, large Vov, and small
Vi help reduce Ron
11
T/H Errors (T-to-H Transition)
  • Pedestal error (often signal-dependent) resulted
    from switch turn-off
  • nonidealities (clock feedthrough and charge
    injection)
  • Aperture delay the delay ?t b/t hold command
    and hold action
  • Aperture jitter the random variation in ?t
    (i.e., sampling clock jitter)

12
Switch Non-Idealities
13
Pedestal Error of Top-Plate T/H
Slow turn-off
Fast turn-off
Watch out for nonlinear errors!
14
Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff of T/H
Pedestal error
TBW
Therefore
Technology scaling improves T/H performance!
15
Aperture Delay (?t)
  • Fixed aperture delay is usually not of problem in
    a single-path T/H
  • Non-uniform aperture delays among
    time-interleaved T/H paths cause significant
    errors (?t1, ?t2 are also called sampling clock
    skew)

16
Aperture Jitter
Ref M. Shinagawa, Y. Akazawa, and T. Wakimoto,
Jitter analysis of high-speed sampling systems,
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 25,
issue 1, pp. 220-224, 1990.
17
Aperture Jitter
?
18
Aperture Jitter
19
T/H Errors (Hold Mode)
  • Hold-mode droop caused by off-switch/diode/gate
    leakage
  • Hold-mode input feedthrough (i.e., due to
    capacitive coupling)

20
Evaluating T/H Performance
kT/C noise
T 300K
SNDR
Noise
Distortion
Jitter
21
MOS S/H Techniques
22
Simple Top-Plate Sampling
  • Pros
  • Simple, minimum number of devices
  • Potentially wideband, zero track-mode offset
  • Cons
  • Signal-dependent tracking bandwidth
  • Signal-dependent charge injection and clock
    feedthrough
  • Signal-dependent aperture delay (sampling point)

23
Signal-Dependent Aperture Delay
  • Non-uniform sampling due to signal-dependent
    aperture delay causes distortion in top-plate S/H
  • Sharp clock edge and small Vin mitigate the delay
    variation

24
Signal Distortion
? 2nd-order
?
25
CMOS Switch
  • Ron still depends on Vin and is sensitive to N/P
    mismatch
  • Large parasitic cap due to PMOS switch for
    symmetric Ron
  • Clock rising/falling edge alignment

26
Clock Bootstrapping
  • Constant gate overdrive voltage VGS VDD for the
    switch
  • Ron is not dependent on Vin to the first order
    (body effect?)
  • NMOS device only with less parasitic capacitance

27
Clock Bootstrapping
Ref A. M. Abo and P. R. Gray, A 1.5-V, 10-bit,
14.3-MS/s CMOS pipeline ADC, IEEE Journal of
Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, issue 5, pp.
599-606, 1999.
28
Clock Bootstrapping (F0)
29
Clock Bootstrapping (F1)
30
Dummy Switch
  • Initial size of dummy chosen with the assumption
    of a 50/50 split of Qch usually (W/L)dummy lt
    ½(W/L)switch in practice
  • The nonlinear dependence of CI on Zi, CS, and
    clock rise/fall time makes it difficult to
    achieve a precise cancellation
  • ?_ rising edge must trail ? falling edge

31
Balanced Switch Dummy
  • TBW
  • Parasitics

Ref L. A. Bienstman and H. J. De Man, An
eight-channel 8 bit microprocessor compatible
NMOS D/A converter with programmable scaling,
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 15,
issue 6, pp. 1051-1059, 1980.
32
Fully-Differential T/H
E.g.
  • All even-order distortions cancelled, including
    the signal-dependent aperture delay-induced
    distortion
  • Actual cancellation limited by P/N mismatch
    (1-10 typically)

33
Bottom-Plate Sampling
  • AC-ground switch opens slightly earlier than
    input switches
  • Signal-independent CF and CI of switch Fe to the
    first order!
  • Top-plate switch can be further bootstrapped
  • Typically for applications of more than 8-bit
    resolution
  • Less tracking bandwidth due to more switches in
    series
  • Signal swing at node X is not entirely zero!

34
Sample-and-Hold Amplifier(SHA)
35
Inverting SHA
  • Inverting, closed-loop gain determined by the
    ratio CS/CH
  • CMOS or bootstrapped switches are required when
    passing signals with large swing (where?)

36
Inverting SHA (Track-Mode)
  • CF and CI are independent of Vin and cancelled
    differentially
  • F1e switch is equivalent to two switches of half
    channel length ? faster, less CF and CI

37
Inverting SHA (Hold-Mode)
  • CM?
  • DM?
  • For 1X gain (CS CH), the feedback factor is
    about 1/2
  • Floating switch F2 in hold-mode ? flexible input
    common mode
  • Useful for single-ended to differential conversion

38
Differential Mode
DM half circuit
?
  • DM charge transfer is complete

39
Common Mode
CM half circuit
?
  • CM charge is not transferred!

40
Flip-Around SHA
  • Non-inverting, 1X closed-loop gain
  • Close-to-unity feedback factor in hold mode
  • CF/CI independent of Vin and cancelled
    differentially
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com