Title: Michael B Simpson, Technical Sales Manager
1FTNIR Calibration Transport For Refinery Product
Measurements
- Michael B Simpson, Technical Sales Manager
- David Reece, Applications Scientist
- Fred Baudais, Senior Applications Scientist
- ABB Bomem, HPI Chemicals Team
2ABB Refinery Applications
3Gasoline Blender
n-Butane
Light straight run gasoline
Isomerate gasoline
Reformate gasoline
FCC gasoline
Gasoline Blender
Coker gasoline
Hyrodcracker gasoline
Alkylate gasoline
MTBE
Other
4Profitability of Gasoline Blending Operation
- Factors affecting profitability are
- Optimization of blending component production
- Inventory control
- Minimizing quality giveaway
- Ever tightening legislative regulations
- FTNIR can help optimize the blending operation
efficiency
5Process FTNIR AnalysisTypical Performance
Characteristics
6Analysis Stability - RON
8 hour stability
7Uses of a Lab FTNIR to Support the On-line FTNIR
Analyzer
- Feasibility and training
- Collecting calibration spectra
- before on-line installation
- transport calibration to on-line analyzer
- Back-up to on-line analyzer
- Extend on-line analyzer calibrations
8Calibration Transport
How difficult is this?
9Blended Gasoline Spectrum
10- A Chemical or Physical Property
CALIBRATION MODEL
The IR Absorbance Spectrum
11SPECIFIC GRAVITY (GAS OIL)
12Factors from the Training Set
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
FACTORS
S1
S2
SCORES
13Absorbance Differences between Analysers will
displace samples in the Score Space, and lead to
prediction errors
S1
S3
S2
14- First Rule of Engineering
- Theres no such thing as THE SAME
- Only HOW DIFFERENT ?
15Difference spectra (Lab minus On-line)
16Effect of Optical Integrity on Analyser
Reproducibility
Collimated beam through interferometer
17Effect of Optical Integrity on Analyser
Reproducibility
Must see central fringe ONLY
Image of Point Source at Detector
18Effect of Optical Integrity on Analyser
Reproducibility
Self Apodisation distorts bandshape
19Effect of Optical Integrity on Analyser
Reproducibility
Off-Axis Rays cause Wavelength Shift
20Analysis Stability - Toluene, 12 Process Lab
Analysers
21Analysis Stability - Toluene, 12 Analysers,
under Battle Conditions
22Gasoline Spectra Comparison Between On-Line
Analysers
23Gasoline Spectral Variance Between On-Line and
Lab Analysers
24Gasoline Calibration Data Set All Data Overlaid
25Gasoline Data Set Score Projection of 2 and
5mAbs Spectral Difference
26Gasoline Data Set Prediction Error from 5mAbs
Variance
27Test Data for Gasoil Model
28Gasoil Test /- 0.003 Abs
29Gasoil Test Data /- 0.009 Abs
30Test Data for Gasoil Model - Density
31Test Data for Gasoil Model - Cloud Point
32Test Data Calibration Model Transport
These data suggest that Calibration
Transportability between analysers, to give
agreement well inside the SEV of the relevant
property prediction model, will require absolute
spectral measurement differences of around 0.002
Absorbance Units.
33Gasoline Property Prediction Differences in
Practice
- What measurement agreement is achieved when PLS
type calibrations, used to determine gasoline
properties on one analyzer, are transported
without modification or correction to another
analyzer for the same sample? - No slope or offset adjustment
- No mapping between instruments
34Lab to On-line Calibration Transport
35On-line to On-line Calibration Transport
36Calibration Transport
37Conclusions
- Transporting calibrations between FTNIR
instrument types (lab to on-line, on-line to
on-line) is achievable on a production basis
without using mathematical techniques.