Oil - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Oil

Description:

Our existing programs are sometimes ... BIG BEND. BADLANDS. GLACIER. MT RAINIER. PETRIFIED FOREST. GRAND CANYON. GREAT. BASIN. YOSEMITE ... Drilling rigs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Reg990
Category:
Tags: big | canyon | crater | grand | lake | national | oil | park | rigs

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Oil


1
Oil Natural Gas Partnership
2
Problem
  • We are having problems meeting NAAQS and regional
    haze standards in the West
  • Our existing programs are sometimes difficult to
    implement
  • Collaborate now to get ahead of problem to avoid
    a more difficult implementation in the future

3
  • From DOEs Office of Fossil Energy, concern
    about air emissions from exploration and
    production activities is focused on five or six
    areas in the United States where operations are
    ongoing.

4
Visibility Yellowstone NP
Spectrum SeriesRegional Haze Spectrum 2 of
1590000 AMRepresentativedv1 
Spectrum SeriesRegional Haze Spectrum 12 of
1590000 AMRepresentativedv15  8/98 RM/NGP
Report - Poor
5
(No Transcript)
6
Air Quality Trends in Western National Parks,
1994-2003
FY2004 Annual Performance Report For NPS
Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) Air
Quality Goal Ia3
Colored boxes indicate the existence of air
quality trends during 1994-2003. Dark green and
red boxes indicate statistically significant
improving or degrading trends at the .05
significance level while the light green and
yellow boxes represent similar trends but not
statistically significant with probabilities (p
values) between 0.05 and 0.15. These last two
symbols are included to indicate which parks had
trends that would have been considered
statistically significant under the procedures
used in past years. A significance level of .05
means there is a 5 chance of concluding there
was a trend when in fact the change was due to
chance.
02/04/2005
7
Rural Ozone
8
Future OG Development
  • Over 50 of CBM production in USA from Rocky Mtn
    region - Powder River, Raton, San Juan, and Uinta
    basins (DOE estimates reserves 143 Tcf)
  • Future development in Piceance, Denver, and
    Greater Green River basins (DOE estimates
    reserves 415 Tcf)
  • 50-80 of estimated recoverable CBM in the US
    will be from the Rocky Mtn region

9
Future OG Development
  • Rocky Mountain Region contains more natural gas
    than any other onshore region in the lower 48
    states
  • Twice the amount of annual product by 2025
  • 3.3 Trillion cubic feet in 2002
  • 4.6 TCF by 2010
  • 6.3 TCF by 2025

10
Current Challenges
  • Court ordered deadline to decide on whether
    current federal standards are adequate to protect
    Western parks from nitrogen pollution
  • Regional Haze SIPs due at the end of 2007
  • PSD permit requirements
  • Increment analyses to include all sources
  • Denver ozone SIP
  • MACT regulations

11
Current Challenges
  • ED Powder River Basin CBM EIS and other citizen
    lawsuits
  • EISs
  • Traditional enforcement

12
A Message from the President
13
Partnership for Sustainable Development
  • Collaborative, non-traditional approach to
    develop in a sustainable manner
  • Seeking Industry partnership

14
Vision
  • Get ahead of looming air quality impacts
  • Create room for continued growth
  • Support oil gas development
  • Achieve emission reductions
  • Minimize venting and flaring
  • WIN-WIN solutions

15
Goals/Potential Benefits
  • Provide head room for continued growth
  • Create certainty with flexibility
  • Lessen past and future enforcement and regulatory
    liabilities
  • Streamline permitting
  • Increase gas to market through reduced gas loss
  • Increase profits
  • Protect the environment
  • Improve public perception

16
Solution
  • Develop and implement a productive and efficient
    program to decrease environmental impacts while
    maintaining pace of development by
  • Building consensus with State Partners on
    overarching goals of a program
  • Identifying options to achieve these goals
  • Collaborating with Industry on developing
    potential options

17
Elements of Partnership
RESOLVE PAST COMPLIANCE ISSUES
DEVELOP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR EXISTING
SOURCES
DEVELOP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR AMBIENT
MONITORING PROGRAMS
STREAMLINE AGENCY INDUSTRY INTERACTION
18
Element Characteristics
DEVELOP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR EXISTING
SOURCES
DEVELOP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOP TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR AMBIENT
MONITORING PROGRAMS
STREAMLINE AGENCY INDUSTRY INTERACTION
RESOLVE PAST COMPLIANCE ISSUES
  • Flexibility but with certainty
  • Timeliness
  • Regional consistency
  • Less administrative burden
  • Reduce emissions from
  • Well completions
  • Drilling rigs
  • Production processes (flares, dehyds, tanks,
    engines, transportation systems, instrumentation,
    pigging)
  • Fugitive dust from roads
  • Multiple stakeholder support for capital
    investment and ongoing operational expenses
  • Agencies to determine network design
  • Supports modeling efforts for quantifying
    cumulative impacts
  • Reduce existing emission inventory
  • Reduce existing impacts
  • Improve operational efficiency
  • Accommodate future growth
  • If, industry invests in emission reduction
    technologies, monitoring, operational
    optimization, etc
  • Then, no look back

19
Solution
  • States and EPA have evaluated options for
    discussion with Industry to address
  • NOx
  • VOCs
  • PM
  • ambient monitoring
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com