Western Transmission Expansion Projects: Frontier Line and TransWest Express - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Western Transmission Expansion Projects: Frontier Line and TransWest Express

Description:

Western Transmission Expansion Projects: Frontier Line and TransWest Express – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: jefferybg
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Western Transmission Expansion Projects: Frontier Line and TransWest Express


1
Western Transmission Expansion Projects Frontier
Line and TransWest Express
  • Jeffery Greenblatt
  • NREL Meeting
  • January 4, 2007

2
Frontier Line
  • Proposed transmission corridor to interconnect
    Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, California and possibly
    other states
  • MOU signed on April 4, 2005

Example pathway by California Energy Commission,
Wyoming-California Corridor Transmission
Expansion Study, Global Energy Decisions, June
2006, CEC-700-2006-008.
3
Frontier Line
  • Motivated by demand growth in California,
    projected to be 2/yr (1,000 MW per year),
    driving overall project need.
  • Transmission would also provide power to sites
    along route (e.g., Salt Lake City, Las Vegas,
    possibly points in Arizona, New Mexico and
    Colorado).
  • Envisioned capacity up to 12 GW, utilizing
    combinations of coal and renewables (primarily
    wind) in region.

4
Frontier Line
  • Scenarios being considered
  • Baseline growth (through 2016)
  • Enhanced renewables
  • Enhanced coal
  • Enhanced efficiency
  • Enhanced efficiency renewables
  • Two regional variants (enhanced coal in WY and
    enhanced generation in NM)

5
Frontier Line
  • Economics subcommittee (where I am a member)
    currently developing cost estimates for each
    generation technology as well as efficiency/DSM.
    Recent attention has focused on wind and other
    renewables. Dave Olsen (CEERT) has been investing
    significant time to ensure these are done
    properly.
  • Currently I am unclear on cost assumptions being
    used for clean coal technology, as well as
    alternate wind scenarios (overbuilt wind,
    wind/CAES)
  • Spreadsheet-based planning tool (FEAST)
    developed to test scenarios with variable input
    assumptions.

6
Frontier Line
  • Timeline
  • Preliminary analysis to be released in January,
    with stakeholder input thereafter.
  • Phase I (feasibility study) to be completed in
    April 2007.
  • Unclear on timeline for further development (but
    see TransWest Express below).

7
Frontier Line
  • Committee members include
  • Utilities PGE, SDGE, SCE, Sierra Pacific
    Nevada Power, PacifiCorps, APS, PNM, SMUD
  • Government Wyoming Governors office, Montana
    Governors office
  • NGOs Environmental Defense, CEERT, Sierra Club
  • Business BP, ABB, Babcock Brown, Wyoming
    Infrastructure Authority, Wyoming Business
    Council, NAPG, Trans-Elect, National Grid,
    Invenergy, Shell Wind Energy, Deseret Power, ITC,
    TANC, Energy Strategies, IES, KEMA, Woodruff
    Expert Services, Global Energy Decisions,
    Electric Power Group, Policy Communications, and
    New Energy Associates

8
TransWest Express
  • Announced by Arizona Public Service Company (APS)
    in October 2005
  • Growth in Southwest is three times national
    average (4/yr) projected 9,000 MW new capacity
    needed in AZ alone by 2020.
  • Project designed to deliver up to 3,000 MW of
    power, but some options allow up to 5,000 MW
    without upgrade.
  • Project further along than Frontier Line
    feasibility study just completed.

9
TransWest Express
Several alternatives proposed, including
Statement of Robert Smith on behalf of Arizona
Public Service Company and the TransWest Express
Project before the House Subcommittee on Water
and Power and the House Subcommittee on Forests
and Forest Health, June 27, 2006.
10
TransWest Express
  • Goal is to access coal (including advanced clean
    coal technologies) and wind resources in Wyoming
    for the Southwest for a balanced resource
    portfolio and strengthen reliability of the
    western transmission system.
  • Cost analysis indicates that cheapest option may
    be scenario D (DC pathway) which also has lowest
    environmental impact.

11
TransWest Express
  • Timeline
  • Phase I (feasibility study) to be completed by
    December 31, 2006.
  • Phase II Detailed engineering and contract
    signed by December 31, 2009.
  • Phase III Construction completed by December 31,
    2012.

12
Opportunities for Research
  • Frontier Line Participate in economic modeling
    through end of January
  • Both Publish independent studies of scenario
    options, focusing (e.g.) on impact of carbon
    price and/or CA GHG generation standard
  • Opportunity to present Frontier Line economic
    analysis at upcoming AWEA conference (June 2007)
  • Use assumptions/lessons learned for modeling
    larger transmission vision
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com