Beyond Arrest: The Official Responses to IPV: Prosecution, Mediation, and Treatment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Beyond Arrest: The Official Responses to IPV: Prosecution, Mediation, and Treatment

Description:

Prosecutors can pursue criminal prosecution using only the ... Anger & stress management. Impulse control. problem-solving skills. Substance abuse. Depression ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: mlme
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Beyond Arrest: The Official Responses to IPV: Prosecution, Mediation, and Treatment


1
Beyond Arrest The Official Responses to IPV
Prosecution, Mediation, and Treatment
  • Michelle L. Meloy, Ph.D.

2
Mandatory Prosecution No Drop
  • Born out of the Duluth, Minnesota model of
    community intervention-collaboration
  • mandatory arrest, coordination between
    police-courts-probation and treatment providers.
    Specialized batterer intervention programs
  • Concept of forging ahead with dv cases even w/out
    victim cooperation
  • Prosecutors can pursue criminal prosecution using
    only the evidence collected by the police
  • Victim-support units located in prosecutors
    offices assist in the prosecution of these cases

3
Mandatory Prosecution Competing Interests
  • Prosecutors primary concern is well being of the
    state
  • Conflicts can arise between individual victims
    security the states desire for deterrence
  • Specific deterrence abusers must be officially
    sanctioned, punished treated
  • General deterrence potential abusers must learn
    this is a serious crime with serious repercussions

4
Mandatory Prosecution
  • Hard no-drop policies prohibit victims from
    dismissing a case
  • Require victim cooperation/testimony with the
    possibility of legal sanctions against victims

5
Mandatory Prosecution
  • Soft no-drop policies request but do not
    require victim involvement in the prosecution
    process
  • All types of mandatory policies decrease case
    dismissals attrition

6
Mandatory Prosecution
  • Effectiveness issues unanswered
  • Some support for soft no-drop policies
    Indianapolis found women who were allowed to drop
    their charges experienced less violence than
    those victims not allowed to drop charges
  • Victim empowerment potential

7
Victim advocacy
  • Located within and independent of prosecutors
    offices
  • Demonstrate concern for victims experience with
    prosecution
  • Provide information support about prosecution
    process
  • Research suggests that victim advocates
  • 1) reduce case attrition
  • 2) increase victim satisfaction w/the prosecution
    process
  • 3) feelings of victim empowerment
  • Victim advocates within prosecutors offices can
    have competing interests

8
Battered Womens Shelters
  • National Coalition Against Domestic Violence
    (1978)
  • Over 2,000 shelters
  • 24 hour hotlines
  • Support groups-therapy
  • Legal assistance
  • Emergency housing
  • Transition housing
  • Child care
  • Residential-employment support

9
Effectiveness of shelters
  • Many women return to abusive relationships after
    their stay at a shelter
  • Women who use only shelters and do not augment
    with other social and institutional measures may
    be at increased risk of retaliation from
    batterers
  • Women who combine all these measures tend to
    experience less violence in the future

10
Mediation
  • Informal case processing w/ mediator skilled in
    conflict resolution
  • Agreements can avoid case filings, court delays,
    and secondary role for victims
  • As court congestion increases so has mediation
    practices
  • Underlying assumption equal power, safe secure
    process where both parties can express concerns
    and desires

11
Family Violence Mediation pros/cons
  • Victim empowerment because they are a central
    party
  • Provides alternative for victims who do not
    desire prosecution
  • Educates both parties about legal rights
    responsibilities
  • Individualized justice tailored agreements
  • Participant satisfaction
  • No clear offender
  • Allows abuser to avoid responsibility criminal
    prosecution
  • May reinforce ideas that victims at fault
  • May be impossible to equalize power
  • Mutual agreement highest priority
  • Violence may continue or escalate as contact
    increases

12
Batterer Treatment
  • Began as specialty in the 1970s
  • Most programs are short-term and utilize a
    group-setting
  • Nearly all who attend are court mandated
  • Child protective services, courts, probation
    make referrals
  • Goals include 1) victim safety, 2) changing
    batterers ideas about violence, getting him to
    accept responsibility, and 3) teaching nonviolent
    conflict resolution tactics

13
Batterer Treatment
  • Duluth Model is the most common w state mandates
  • mens power control issues are believed to be
    the cause of most IPV
  • changing attitudes about men women
    (resocialization),
  • changing the concepts of masculinity
  • unlearning violence as a resolution strategy

14
Psychological/Psychiatric Batterer Treatment
  • Cognitive-behavior modification therapy
  • Deconstruct faulty thinking and cognitive
    distortions Reinterpret the event (stimuli) and
    find non-violent alternatives to resolve
    conflict
  • Other therapeutic goals
  • Anger stress management
  • Impulse control
  • problem-solving skills
  • Substance abuse
  • Depression

15
Psychological/Psychiatric Batterer Treatment
  • Couples-Family Systems Approach
  • Preservation of marriage is the focus
  • Least popular with clinicians and practitioners
  • 73 of states with stated standards note this
    treatment as unacceptable
  • The marital dynamic (and whole family) is viewed
    as part of the problem and thus part of the
    solution
  • No clear cut offender or victim
  • May be a practical intervention at the earliest
    stages of abuse, with low-level violence and if
    the victim is not fearful

16
Batterer Treatment Research
  • IPV offenders especially difficult to treat
  • Outcome studies are plagued with methodological
    problems
  • poor outcome /or inconsistent measures
  • random assignment has been difficult to obtain
  • high attrition rates in treatment (drop outs)
  • short follow-up periods
  • lack of reporting for recidivistic behavior

17
Batterer Treatment Outcomes
  • Drop outs have higher recidivism rates than
    treatment completers
  • Predictions of drop-out undereducated,
    unemployment, no court mandate, substance abuse
    problems
  • 2001-2002 experimental design research on the
    Duluth type models suggests a reduction in
    recidivism where earlier studies did not

18
Changing Court Practices
  • No-drop prosecution
  • Specialized units
  • Victim advocates
  • Criminal charges against victims
  • Court sponsored mediation
  • Batterer treatment
  • Restraining orders
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com