Marketing Canadas Cost Advantage - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Marketing Canadas Cost Advantage

Description:

In general, cost differences among smaller cities in each province tend to be minor ... been reviewed by representatives of most major US/European manufacturers ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: arey
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Marketing Canadas Cost Advantage


1
Marketing Canadas Cost Advantage
  • Presentation to the Economic Development
    Association of Canada
  • Stuart MacKayMMK ConsultingSeptember 26, 2002

2
Contents
  • 2002 Cost study results key messages
  • Delivering the message
  • Update on 2003/04 edition

3
About the 2002 Cost study
  • KPMGs comprehensive guide to comparing business
    costs in G-7 jurisdictions (plus Austria, the
    Netherlands)
  • Last published in 1999
  • The 2002 edition represents the results of a
    major ten-month KPMG research program (30,000
    data inputs)
  • Made possible by more than 60 sponsors in
  • Austria ? Netherlands
  • Canada ? United Kingdom
  • Italy ? United States

4
Study Components
  • Component 1 comparison of business costs among
    the G-7 countries, Austria, Netherlands
  • Overall and by industry/operation (12 standard
    operations)
  • By city and region (115 cities, nine countries)
  • By cost factor (27 factors)
  • 30,000 data points, 10 year time horizon
  • Component 2 - web-based interactive costing model
  • Customized (user-defined) operations
  • Assessing the sensitivity of results to changing
    conditions (taxes/incentives, exchange rates,
    etc.)

5
Site selection considerations
  • Study focus is on business costs
  • Other location issues also need to be considered
    in the site decision

6
Overall results
Overall results (12 operations)
  • Key messages for Canadian EDAs
  • Canada still 1 in G7, as in 1999 and 1997
  • Cost advantage over US has further increased
    since 1999
  • Dollar has weakened (slightly) to 64.7
  • Improving cost fundamentals

Percent cost advantage/(disadvantage) relative
to the United States
7
Comparison Across Provinces
  • US Average 100.0

8
Atlantic/New England
Canada
US
9
Northeast North America
Canada
US
10
Midwest North America
Canada
US
11
Pacific
Canada
US
12
Applicability to other communities
  • If your city is not in the report
  • Refer to data for similar-sized communities in
    your province
  • Some cost factors may distinguish your city from
    others in your province
  • Relative property values
  • Relative property tax rates
  • Separate utility providers
  • In general, cost differences among smaller cities
    in each province tend to be minor
  • Selection based on non-cost factors

13
Manufacturing
Results for manufacturing(7 operations)
  • Key messages for Canadian EDAs
  • Costs differentials are lowest in manufacturing
  • Higher proportion of globally-sourced materials
    and equipment, which do not vary by location
  • Results are least sensitive to exchange rates
  • Canadas cost results are strongest in high- tech
    manufacturing industries (e.g. 1 in electronics
    assembly)
  • Higher proportion of highly skilled labour

Percent cost advantage/(disadvantage) relative
to the United States
14
Software
Results for software (2 operations)
  • Key messages for Canadian EDAs
  • Cost differentials are higher in software
  • Labor costs more significant
  • Vary greatly by country
  • Canada is the overall cost leader
  • Lower labour costs for high-skilled software
    industry workers

Percent cost advantage/(disadvantage) relative
to the United States
15
RD
Results for RD (2 operations)
  • Key messages for Canadian EDAs
  • Cost differentials are even higher in RD
  • Salary costs for scientists and technicians more
    significant
  • Vary greatly by country
  • Canadas strongest positiondue to combination
    of
  • Labour cost advantages
  • RD tax credits

Percent cost advantage/(disadvantage) relative
to the United States
16
Corporate Services
Results for corporate services(1 operations)
  • Key messages for Canadian EDAs
  • Corporate services include
  • account processing
  • call center and
  • IT support operations
  • Costs differentials are very high
  • Costs almost completely labor-driven
  • The United States has its strongest G7 result
    here
  • Competitive clerical and administrative salaries
  • But Canadas after-tax cost advantage is still
    19.7 over the US

Percent cost advantage/(disadvantage) relative
to the United States
17
Exchange rate sensitivity
Impact of Exchange Rates Canada versus US
  • Key messages for Canadian EDAs
  • Canadas cost advantage over the US
  • 14.5 at the exchange rate of 1.546 per US (C
    1.00 US 64.7)
  • 5.1 with a 20 decrease in value of US, to Cdn
    1.237 (C 1.00 US 80.8)
  • Canadian advantage is significant for any
    exchange rate in the foreseeable future

    
18
Labour Costs
Total labor costs Average for 12 operations, US
000
  • Key messages for Canadian EDAs
  • Dont look only at salary wage levels!
  • Canada 1 in loaded labour costs

19
Wages and Salaries
Average for 12 operations Percentage of wages
and salaries
  • Key messages for Canadian EDAs
  • Canadas employee benefits costs are the lowest
    in G7
  • Advantages over US arises from the cost to US
    employers of providing private health care plans

20
Effective corporate income tax- Manufacturing
Effective combined corporate income taxAverage
of six manufacturing operations1Percentage of
net profit before tax
  • Key messages for Canadian EDAs
  • Canadas effective corporate tax rate for
    manufacturers is lower than in the US
  • Recent tax cuts in key provinces
  • Federal tax changes cementing effect of old MP
    tax credits
  • RD tax credits more generous than in the US
  • Effective rates are lowest in Canada for
    RD-intensive operations

1 The specialty chemicals operation is not
included because of marginal profitability/loss
situations in some countries
21
Effective corporate income tax- Non-manufacturing
Effective combined corporate income taxAverage
for five non-manufacturing operationsPercentage
of net profit before tax
  • Key messages for Canadian EDAs
  • Canadas corporate tax rate for non-manufacturing
    is lowest among the G7
  • Influenced by the inclusion of several
    RD-intensive operations
  • Recent federal and provincial tax cuts have had
    greatest benefit for non-manufacturers

22
2. Delivering the Message
  • International Presentations of KPMG Study Results
    (Spring 2002)

23
2. Delivering the Message (contd)
24
2. Delivering the Message (contd)
25
2. Delivering the Message (contd)
26
3. KPMG Cost Study Outlook for 2003/04
  • More than 20,000 copies of the 2002 published
    report have been printed and distributed
  • More than 80,000 summary brochures are in print
  • KPMG distribution to all September 2002 IEDC
    Conference attendees
  • Competitivealternatives.com website received more
    than 900,000 page hits in the first 6 months
  • Study results have been reviewed by
    representatives of most major US/European
    manufacturers
  • Several regional EDAs have provided testimonials/
    success stories
  • Promotional tour in 2002 received media/press
    coverage reaching more than 50 million people

27
3. KPMG Cost Study Outlook for 2003/04 (contd)
  • Planning for the next edition of Competitive
    Alternatives is under way
  • One-year project with report targeted for Fall
    2003 release
  • Website to be updated/enhanced and extended until
    at least February 2005 (2-year extension)
  • Funding from a combination of public and
    corporate sponsors
  • Object is to exceed the 60 sponsors of the 2002
    edition
  • Expected coverage of several new countries
  • Possibly Scandinavian countries, Ireland, and/or
    Australia
  • Expected coverage of at least 120 cities

28
For Further Information
  • Stuart MacKayFounder and Co-AuthorCompetitive
    AlternativesTel 604 484 4621Fax 604 738
    2801Email smackay_at_mmkconsulting.com
  • Glenn MairProject DirectorCompetitive
    AlternativesTel 604 484 4622Fax 604 738
    2801Email gmair_at_mmkconsulting.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com