Title: Marketing Canadas Cost Advantage
1Marketing Canadas Cost Advantage
- Presentation to the Economic Development
Association of Canada - Stuart MacKayMMK ConsultingSeptember 26, 2002
2Contents
- 2002 Cost study results key messages
- Delivering the message
- Update on 2003/04 edition
3About the 2002 Cost study
- KPMGs comprehensive guide to comparing business
costs in G-7 jurisdictions (plus Austria, the
Netherlands) - Last published in 1999
- The 2002 edition represents the results of a
major ten-month KPMG research program (30,000
data inputs) - Made possible by more than 60 sponsors in
- Austria ? Netherlands
- Canada ? United Kingdom
- Italy ? United States
4Study Components
- Component 1 comparison of business costs among
the G-7 countries, Austria, Netherlands - Overall and by industry/operation (12 standard
operations) - By city and region (115 cities, nine countries)
- By cost factor (27 factors)
- 30,000 data points, 10 year time horizon
- Component 2 - web-based interactive costing model
- Customized (user-defined) operations
- Assessing the sensitivity of results to changing
conditions (taxes/incentives, exchange rates,
etc.)
5Site selection considerations
- Study focus is on business costs
- Other location issues also need to be considered
in the site decision
6Overall results
Overall results (12 operations)
- Key messages for Canadian EDAs
- Canada still 1 in G7, as in 1999 and 1997
- Cost advantage over US has further increased
since 1999 - Dollar has weakened (slightly) to 64.7
- Improving cost fundamentals
Percent cost advantage/(disadvantage) relative
to the United States
7 Comparison Across Provinces
8 Atlantic/New England
Canada
US
9Northeast North America
Canada
US
10Midwest North America
Canada
US
11Pacific
Canada
US
12Applicability to other communities
- If your city is not in the report
- Refer to data for similar-sized communities in
your province - Some cost factors may distinguish your city from
others in your province - Relative property values
- Relative property tax rates
- Separate utility providers
- In general, cost differences among smaller cities
in each province tend to be minor - Selection based on non-cost factors
13Manufacturing
Results for manufacturing(7 operations)
- Key messages for Canadian EDAs
- Costs differentials are lowest in manufacturing
- Higher proportion of globally-sourced materials
and equipment, which do not vary by location - Results are least sensitive to exchange rates
- Canadas cost results are strongest in high- tech
manufacturing industries (e.g. 1 in electronics
assembly) - Higher proportion of highly skilled labour
Percent cost advantage/(disadvantage) relative
to the United States
14Software
Results for software (2 operations)
- Key messages for Canadian EDAs
- Cost differentials are higher in software
- Labor costs more significant
- Vary greatly by country
- Canada is the overall cost leader
- Lower labour costs for high-skilled software
industry workers
Percent cost advantage/(disadvantage) relative
to the United States
15RD
Results for RD (2 operations)
- Key messages for Canadian EDAs
- Cost differentials are even higher in RD
- Salary costs for scientists and technicians more
significant - Vary greatly by country
- Canadas strongest positiondue to combination
of - Labour cost advantages
- RD tax credits
Percent cost advantage/(disadvantage) relative
to the United States
16Corporate Services
Results for corporate services(1 operations)
- Key messages for Canadian EDAs
- Corporate services include
- account processing
- call center and
- IT support operations
- Costs differentials are very high
- Costs almost completely labor-driven
- The United States has its strongest G7 result
here - Competitive clerical and administrative salaries
- But Canadas after-tax cost advantage is still
19.7 over the US
Percent cost advantage/(disadvantage) relative
to the United States
17Exchange rate sensitivity
Impact of Exchange Rates Canada versus US
- Key messages for Canadian EDAs
- Canadas cost advantage over the US
- 14.5 at the exchange rate of 1.546 per US (C
1.00 US 64.7) - 5.1 with a 20 decrease in value of US, to Cdn
1.237 (C 1.00 US 80.8) - Canadian advantage is significant for any
exchange rate in the foreseeable future
18Labour Costs
Total labor costs Average for 12 operations, US
000
- Key messages for Canadian EDAs
- Dont look only at salary wage levels!
- Canada 1 in loaded labour costs
19Wages and Salaries
Average for 12 operations Percentage of wages
and salaries
- Key messages for Canadian EDAs
- Canadas employee benefits costs are the lowest
in G7 - Advantages over US arises from the cost to US
employers of providing private health care plans
20Effective corporate income tax- Manufacturing
Effective combined corporate income taxAverage
of six manufacturing operations1Percentage of
net profit before tax
- Key messages for Canadian EDAs
- Canadas effective corporate tax rate for
manufacturers is lower than in the US - Recent tax cuts in key provinces
- Federal tax changes cementing effect of old MP
tax credits - RD tax credits more generous than in the US
- Effective rates are lowest in Canada for
RD-intensive operations
1 The specialty chemicals operation is not
included because of marginal profitability/loss
situations in some countries
21Effective corporate income tax- Non-manufacturing
Effective combined corporate income taxAverage
for five non-manufacturing operationsPercentage
of net profit before tax
- Key messages for Canadian EDAs
- Canadas corporate tax rate for non-manufacturing
is lowest among the G7 - Influenced by the inclusion of several
RD-intensive operations - Recent federal and provincial tax cuts have had
greatest benefit for non-manufacturers
222. Delivering the Message
- International Presentations of KPMG Study Results
(Spring 2002)
232. Delivering the Message (contd)
242. Delivering the Message (contd)
252. Delivering the Message (contd)
263. KPMG Cost Study Outlook for 2003/04
- More than 20,000 copies of the 2002 published
report have been printed and distributed - More than 80,000 summary brochures are in print
- KPMG distribution to all September 2002 IEDC
Conference attendees - Competitivealternatives.com website received more
than 900,000 page hits in the first 6 months - Study results have been reviewed by
representatives of most major US/European
manufacturers - Several regional EDAs have provided testimonials/
success stories - Promotional tour in 2002 received media/press
coverage reaching more than 50 million people
273. KPMG Cost Study Outlook for 2003/04 (contd)
- Planning for the next edition of Competitive
Alternatives is under way - One-year project with report targeted for Fall
2003 release - Website to be updated/enhanced and extended until
at least February 2005 (2-year extension) - Funding from a combination of public and
corporate sponsors - Object is to exceed the 60 sponsors of the 2002
edition - Expected coverage of several new countries
- Possibly Scandinavian countries, Ireland, and/or
Australia - Expected coverage of at least 120 cities
28For Further Information
- Stuart MacKayFounder and Co-AuthorCompetitive
AlternativesTel 604 484 4621Fax 604 738
2801Email smackay_at_mmkconsulting.com
- Glenn MairProject DirectorCompetitive
AlternativesTel 604 484 4622Fax 604 738
2801Email gmair_at_mmkconsulting.com