The Effect of Intranasal Administration of Remifentanil on Intubating Conditions and Airway Response - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

The Effect of Intranasal Administration of Remifentanil on Intubating Conditions and Airway Response

Description:

... of IV adjuncts, such as opioids and propofol, or neuromuscular blocking drugs. ... Propofol anesthesia, a target remifentanil blood concentration of 5 15 ng/mL ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: Albe97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Effect of Intranasal Administration of Remifentanil on Intubating Conditions and Airway Response


1
The Effect of Intranasal Administration of
Remifentanil on Intubating Conditions and Airway
Response After Sevoflurane Induction of
Anesthesia in Children (Anesth Analg
20081071176 81)Department of Anesthesiology,
ChildrensNational Medical Center, Washington
Journal Meeting 2008.09.23 R4??? Albert Wai
Cheung, LAU
????????????? China Medical University Hospital,
Anesthesia Department
2
Background
  • Intubation without the use of muscle relaxants in
    children is frequently done before IV access is
    secured.
  • In this randomized controlled trial, we compared
    intubating conditions and airway response to
    intubation (coughing and/or movement) after
    sevoflurane induction in children at 2 and 3 min
    after the administration of intranasal
    remifentanil (4 mcg/kg) or saline.

3
  • Sevoflurane is now the standard inhaled induction
    drug for children.
  • It has a pleasant smell, does not irritate the
    airways, and has a low blood gas solubility
    coefficient.
  • These properties result in fast and pleasant
    induction of anesthesia.

4
  • High concentrations (8) of sevoflurane were
    reported to induce epileptiform
    electroencephalogram activity in children.1012
  • The effects of these high concentrations in
    children who may be hypovolemic because of
    prolonged fasting are not known.

5
  • Several authors recommend 5 sevoflurane as a
    safe inspired concentration after loss of eyelash
    reflex in children.12
  • The ability to perform laryngoscopy and tracheal
    intubation under light sevoflurane anesthesia
    is often facilitated by the use of IV adjuncts,
    such as opioids and propofol, or neuromuscular
    blocking drugs.

6
  • Remifentanil hydrochloride is a potent
    ultrashort-acting opioid analgesic that undergoes
    rapid metabolism by tissue and plasma esterases.
  • The mean half-life in children has been found to
    be similar across age groups, with means of 3.4
    5.7 min.13

7
  • In children, it has been shown to provide
    acceptable tracheal intubating conditions without
    neuromuscular blocking drugs when combined with
    IV propofol induction.15,16

8
  • Fentanyl has been used nasally to control pain
    and/or irritability after bilateral myringotomy
    tube surgery in children with good results. 17,18

9
  • Our hypothesis was that remifentanil,
    administered intranasally at a dose of 4 mcg/kg,
    2 3 min before laryngoscopy, would increase the
    percentage of patients with acceptable intubation
    conditions after a 5 sevoflurane induction when
    compared to patients who received no remifentanil.

10
Methods
  • 188 children, 17-yr old, were studied. Nasal
    remifentanil
  • (4 mcg/kg) or saline was administered 1 min after
    an 8 sevoflurane N2O induction. The sevoflurane
    concentration was then reduced to 5 in oxygen,
    and ventilation assisted/controlled.
  • An anesthesiologist blinded to treatment
    assignment used a validated score to evaluate the
    conditions for laryngoscopy response to
    intubation.
  • Blood samples for determination of remifentanil
    blood concentrations were collected from 17
    children at baseline, 2, 3, 4, and 10 min after
    nasal administration of remifentanil.

11
  • We conducted a double-blind, randomized,
    controlled trial to compare
  • intubating conditions and airway response to
    intubation as primary outcomes, and
  • hemodynamic response, chest wall compliance and
    oxygen saturation as secondary outcomes.

12
  • Included were 188 ASA physical Status I or II
    pediatric patients, aged 17 yr, undergoing
    elective surgical procedures that require
    tracheal intubation.
  • Excluded were children with a history of upper
    respiratory tract infection in the previous week,
    reactive airway disease requiring daily
    treatment, or in whom a difficult intubation was
    anticipated.

13
  • At level 1, participants were randomly allocated
    to receive nasally either remifentanil (4 mcg/kg)
    or placebo (equal volume of saline).
  • At level 2, each level 1 group was randomly
    allocated to have either 2 or 3 min intubating
    times.
  • In addition, blood samples were obtained from 17
    patients to determine the pharmacokinetics of
    nasally administered remifentanil in children.
  • The IRB approval, and parental consent were
    obtained in all cases.

14
  • An investigator, blinded to the duration of time
    from nasal drug administration (being outside the
    room during induction), attempted laryngoscopy
    and intubation, and scored the response19 (Table
    1).

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Results
  • Good or excellent intubating conditions were
    achieved at 2 min (after the remifentanil bolus)
    in 68.2 and at 3 min in 91.7 of the children
    who received intranasal remifentanil versus 37
    and 23 in children who received placebo (Plt
    0.01).
  • The mean remifentanil plasma concentrations (
    ?SD) at 2, 3, 4, and 10 min were 1.0
    (0.60), 1.47 (0.52), 1.70 (0.46), 1.16 (0.36)
    ng/mL, respectively.
  • Peak plasma concentration was observed at 3.47
    min. There were no complications associated with
    the use of nasal remifentanil.

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Discussion
  • Use of nasal remifentanil in this study resulted
    in better intubating conditions in children
    during light sevoflurane anesthesia than placebo.
  • This approach, therefore, can allow for earlier
    laryngoscopy and intubation under light
    sevoflurane anesthesia.

24
  • A survey of members of the Society for Pediatric
    Anesthesia found that tracheal intubation using
    an inhaled anesthetic without muscle relaxation
    (IAWMR) was used in children by 44 of the
    respondents.23
  • Anesth Analg 19998873741
  • In that study, the most commonly stated reason
    for using IAWMR was the lack of need for a muscle
    relaxant during intubation or maintenance of
    anesthesia.

25
  • Difficulty with pediatric venous access, because
    of either technical challenge or lack of an
    assistant able to place an IV, were other reasons
    many survey responders used IAWMR.
  • Anesthesiologists who most often used IAWMR had
    three times the odds of working most cases alone
    without an assistant to start an IV line.

26
  • Inomata and Nishikawa25 suggested an ED95 (95
    effective dose) end-tidal sevoflurane conc. of
    4.68 for tracheal intubation be obtained by
    inspired conc. of 5 sevoflurane in oxygen for an
    average of 3.5 min.
  • Can J Anaesth 19964380611

27
  • The average induction time required for smooth
    tracheal intubation in 95 of children breathing
    sevoflurane 5 in oxygen has been found 3 min 14
    s. 26
  • Anaesthesia 1998534405

28
  • IAWMR technique is sometimes facilitated by the
    use of adjuvants, such as topical lidocaine,28
  • Anesth Analg 1999891328
  • or IV administration of an opioid, to blunt the
    airway response to laryngoscopy and intubation.

29
  • Crawford et al.16 showed that, after propofol
    induction in infants, an IV dose of 3 mcg/kg of
    remifentanil (90s) was effective in achieving
    adequate intubation conditions 90 s after
    remifentanil administration, and that the dose
    response of remifentanil for tracheal intubation
    was similar in infants and children.
  • Anesth Analg 20051001599604

30
  • Crawford et al.16 calculated the ED50 and ED95
    doses of IV remifentanil, that are required to
    achieve acceptable intubating conditions after 4
    mg/kg IV propofol induction, to be
  • 1.7 ? 0.1 mcg/kg (ED50)
  • 2. 88 ? 0.5 mcg/kg (ED95), respectively.

31
  • The choice of a 4 mcg/kg dose of nasal
    remifentanil was based on an assumption that
    blood levels of nasally administered drugs are
    about half that obtained after IV dosing. 32
  • Can J Anaesth 1989364947
  • The optimal dose of IV remifentanil for tracheal
    intubation under sevoflurane anesthesia in adults
    was found by Joo et al. 14 to be 2 mcg/kg,
  • hence our 4 mcg/kg dosing.

32
  • intubation conditions with IV remifentanil in
    children used 3 mcg/kg, which is a higher dose
    than we used in our study.15
  • Other authors reported that an IV dose of 45
    mcg/kg of remifentanil may be even more reliable
    in achieving good intubating conditions after
    2mg/kg of IV propofol in adults.34

33
  • Remifentanil at 3.3 ng/mL combined with
    sevoflurane at 1-minimum alveolar anesthetic
    concentration provided excellent conditions for
    intubation without muscle relaxants in 50 of
    adult patients.35

34
  • Propofol anesthesia, a target remifentanil blood
    concentration of 515 ng/mL provided good
    intubating conditions and absence of cough about
    75 of the time.36

35
  • Future studies should examine the intubating
    conditions and the possible side effects of using
    a higher remifentanil dose nasally.

36
Conclusions
  • Nasal administration of remifentanil produces
    good-to-excellent intubating conditions in 23
    min after sevoflurane induction of anesthesia.

37
Thank you for your attention.
  • Thank you for your attention.

38
  • Induction, recovery, and safety characteristics
    of sevoflurane in children undergoing ambulatory
    surgery. A comparison with halothane.
    Anesthesiology 199684133240

39
  • High concentration versus incremental induction
    of anaesthesia with sevoflurane in children a
    comparison of induction times, vital signs, and
    complications. J Clin Anesth 199810415

40
  • Immediate 8 sevoflurane induction in children a
    comparison with incremental sevoflurane and
    incremental halothane. Anesth Analg
    19978531316

41
  • The pharmacology of sevoflurane in infants and
    children. Anesthesiology 1994 8081424

42
  • Clinical characteristics of sevoflurane in
    children a comparison with halothane.
    Anesthesiology 1995823846

43
  • Sevoflurane for ENTsurgery in children. A
    comparison with halothane. Acta Anaesthesiol
    Scand 19953954650

44
  • Blood/gas solubilities of sevoflurane,
    isoflurane, halothane and serum constituent
    concentrations in neonates and adults.
    Anesthesiology 1990727936

45
  • Partition coefficients for sevoflurane in human
    blood, saline, and olive oil. Anesth Analg
    1987666546

46
  • End-tidal sevoflurane concentration for tracheal
    intubation and minimal alveolar concentration in
    pediatric patients.
  • Anesthesiology 199480936

47
  • Electrical seizures during sevoflurane anesthesia
    in two pediatric patients with epilepsy.
    Anesthesiology 19948115357

48
  • Sevoflurane mask induction of anaesthesia is
    associated with epileptiform EEG in children.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 20014580511
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com