Phases of audit planning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Phases of audit planning

Description:

The auditor should plan the audit so that the engagement will be performed in ... Kim Smith Examiner ACCA. Analytical procedures. At the final review stage : ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:572
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: loca183
Category:
Tags: audit | kim | phases | planning | smith

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Phases of audit planning


1
Auditing I Week 7
  • Phases of audit planning
  • Desired level of assurance
  • Impact of materiality
  • Impact of audit risk on planning
  • Engagement Letter
  • Analytical procedures

2
Phases of audit planning
  • If any task is to be completed effectively and
    efficiently it must be planned.
  • ISA 300
  • The auditor should plan the audit so that the
    engagement will be performed in and effective
    manner.
  • Benefits
  • Attention is devoted to important areas.
  • Potential problems are identified and resolved.
  • Work is performed in an efficient, effective and
    timely manner.
  • Assists in proper assignment of work to
    assistants.
  • Coordinates the work of other auditors and
    experts.

3
Audit Planning
  • Planning has two stages
  • Audit strategy development OVERALL AUDIT PLAN
  • Audit programme design.

4
Audit strategy development
  • Scope and conduct of the audit.
  • How much evidence.
  • What evidence.
  • How should this be done.
  • And when should it be done.
  • Audit strategy
  • Desired level of audit risk.
  • Materiality levels.
  • Assessment of inherent and internal control risk.

5
Considerations in developing and audit strategy
  • ISA 300
  • Knowledge of the business.
  • Understanding of the accounting and internal
    control systems.
  • Risk and materiality.
  • Nature timing and extent of the procedures.
  • Coordination, direction, supervision and review.
  • Other matters.

6
Considerations in developing and audit strategy
  • Audit strategy depends on
  • General economic factors and industry conditions.
  • Level of assurance (level of confidence in
    opinion).
  • Materiality.
  • Likelihood of material errors being present.
  • Appropriate segments into which audit can be
    divided to facilitate conduct of the work.
  • Availability and sources of evidence.
  • Likely impact of IT.
  • Availability of suitable staff and if applicable
    other experts.

7
Audit programme design
  • The operational aspect.
  • Sets out detailed procedures to be performed
  • For each auditable area.
  • Whether interim/final work.
  • Type of test.
  • Size of sample.
  • Instructions for audit staff to follow.
  • Allows for working papers to be prepared and
    cross referenced to other evidence.
  • Allows staff to sign off the work.
  • Assists with review of work.

8
Desired level of assurance
  • Auditors are required under CA 1985 to state an
    opinion.
  • Therefore they need to give reasonable assurance
    that the financial statements are true and fair.
  • And as such they want to be reasonably confident
    that the financial statements are not materially
    misstated and their opinion is correct.

9
Desired level of assurance
  • ISA 200 Objective and General Principles
  • Poor attempt to define reasonable assurance. A
    better definition is
  • The desired level of assurance is the
    subjectively determined level of confidence that
    the auditor wants to have about the fair
    presentation of the financial statements after
    the audit is completed. The higher the level of
    assurance attained, the more confident the
    auditor is that the financial statements contain
    no material misstatements
  • Arens and Loebbecke (1980)
  • (see page 208 of PSH)

10
Levels of assurance
  • Level of assurance is the complement of the
    desired level of risk.
  • E.g. 95 confident prepared to accept 5 risk.
  • High levels of assurance
  • Where large numbers of users are likely to rely
    on the accounts (Note Caparo case limited this
    exposure).
  • Or when a takeover is contemplated.
  • Or there is a going concern issue.

11
Impact of materiality
  • Objective
  • The auditor establishes an acceptable materiality
    level judgement is required.
  • The amount (quantity) and the nature (quality) of
    misstatements needs to be considered.
  • Need to consider overall materiality and account
    level materiality (tolerable error).
  • Materiality must not be viewed as a fixed
    monetary amount.
  • Needs to be re-evaluated throughout the audit.

12
Impact of materiality
  • The auditor needs to consider
  • Possibility of small amounts that accumulate into
    a large amount.
  • Also consider the classes of transactions,
    account balances and disclosures.
  • E.g. for disclosure of directors emoluments and
    related party transactions - materiality is
    irrelevant.

13
Factors to be considered when accepting a
tolerable error rate.
  • Significance of the account balance e.g. cash.
  • The size of the account balance.
  • The auditability of the account.
  • Relative significance of over/under statement of
    the account balance e.g. overstated debtors and
    understated liabilities.
  • The smaller the tolerable error the more
    evidence/testing is required.

14
Impact of audit risk on planning
  • The risk that the auditor gives an inappropriate
    opinion when the financial statements are
    materially misstated.
  • Some degree of audit risk is unavoidable.
  • ISA 400 Risk assessments and internal control.
  • Components
  • Inherent risk (IR)
  • Control risk (CR)
  • Detection risk (DR)

15
Impact of audit risk on planning
  • Audit firms focus is on an efficient,
    cost-effective audit and therefore they adopt a
    risk-based approach.
  • Risk like materiality is ascertained at the
    overall level and the FSA level.
  • Objective of risk-based auditing is
  • To achieve maximum effectiveness and efficiency.
  • To avoid under/over auditing.

16
Relationships of Risk
  • Inherent and Control Risk
  • Risk of material error being present in the
    Unaudited financial statements
  • Plus the risk of failing to detect material error
  • Audit Risk (IRCR)DR
  • Inherent and control risk are beyond the direct
    control of the auditor, therefore detection risk
    should be adjusted to achieve the desired level
    of audit risk.

17
Relationships of Risk
  • The audit risk model assigns probability and is
    therefore
  • AR IR x CR x DR
  • However this model is not without its critics
  • Each event has to be independent of each other.

18
Audit Risk,Materiality Planning
  • There is an inverse relationship between
    materiality and the level of audit risk.
  • The higher the materiality level the lower the
    level of audit risk.
  • The lower the materiality level the higher the
    level of audit risk.

19
Audit Risk, Materiality Planning
  • Audits must be planned to ensure that
  • Inherent risk is properly assessed.
  • Internal control risk is properly evaluated.
  • Sufficient appropriate substantive procedures are
    performed so that detection risk and therefore
    audit risk is reduced to an acceptable level.
  • Hence in order to reduce the audit risk to an
    acceptable level, the auditor must carefully
    plane the nature, timing and extent of audit
    procedures.
  • Lower materiality, higher audit risk and more
    substantive testing required.

20
Analytical procedures
  • Its Meaning
  • . By which meaningful relationships and trends
    in both financial and non-financial data may be
    analysed, actual data may be compared with
    budgeted or forecast data, and the data of an
    entity may be compared with that of similar
    entities and industry averages.
  • PSH page 228

21
Analytical procedures
  • Examples include
  • Ratios, percentages, trends and comparative
    analysis e.g.
  • Comparison of payroll costs on a monthly basis
    taking into account wage increases starters,
    leavers etc.
  • Comparison of sales seasonality year on year.
  • Comparison of aged debtors on monthly basis and
    calculation of debtor days.
  • Gross profit comparison year on year.

22
Analytical procedures
  • AP is considered to be highly efficient and
    effective but it is limited by
  • The quality of the underlying data.
  • The accuracy of relationships.
  • Relevant availability of information.
  • Information that is comparable.
  • Auditors knowledge of the business.

23
Analytical procedures
  • Used at 3 stages of the audit
  • Planning
  • Liquidity
  • Solvency
  • Profitability
  • Substantive tests
  • Final review

24
Analytical procedures
  • Key features
  • Investigation
  • Explanation
  • Corroboration
  • Prediction
  • Plausible explanations may not always be the
    case!
  • For example.

25
Analytical procedures
  • We sold more cola in June because it was very
    hot
  • After investigation , explanation and
    corroboration it could be
  • we recorded more cola sales in June because a
    large batch of invoices was posted twice in
    error!

26
Analytical procedures
  • At the final review stageAnalytical review at
    this stage is required in forming an overall
    conclusion
  • As to whether the financial statements as a whole
    are consistent with the auditors knowledge of
    the business.
  • The review may also identify the need for further
    substantive procedures.

27
Analytical procedures
  • Ratio analysis is particularly useful in testing
    the consistency of the inter-relationships of
    amounts disclosed in the financial statements.
  • It is usual to compare ratios calculated at this
    stage with those of the preliminary analytical
    review
  • Kim Smith Examiner ACCA

28
Analytical procedures
  • At the final review stage
  • The auditor should tabulate the information
    contained in the financial statements.
  • Identify any discrepancies between the financial
    statements and the auditors knowledge of the
    industry.
  • The business and the results of earlier years.
  • Confirmation by the auditor that there are no
    unexplained discrepancies should be recorded as
    the conclusion to the review.

29
Analytical procedures
  • Audit firms may find it useful to record
    appropriate key ratios and performance indicators
    specific to each client within their permanent
    files each year.
  • As part of their knowledge of the business for
    use in future audits.
  • This record will often be of more value and use
    than just calculating standard ratios, during
    each audit.
  • Which may not be particularly meaningful for some
    clients.
  • Andrew Skaife, Compliance Officer, Monitoring
    Unit, ACCA

30
The Engagement Letter
  • This is a letter sent by the auditor
  • Setting out the terms of the engagement
  • Forming the basis of a contract.
  • Hence avoiding any misunderstandings.

31
The Engagement Letter
  • The contents should be
  • Ideally agreed prior to the audit.
  • Should be reviewed annually.

32
The Engagement Letter
  • The letter addresses
  • The responsibilities of the directors.
  • The responsibilities of the auditors.
  • The scope of the audit.
  • Description of audit procedures.
  • Other services potentially being offered.
  • The billing method for fees.
  • The applicable law.
  • And agreement of terms.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com