CASE STUDIESRELEVANCE OF THE DTM MODEL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

CASE STUDIESRELEVANCE OF THE DTM MODEL

Description:

DR falls (National Insurance 1911/TB treatments. via Local Councils 1921/pension schemes)Rapidly ... British colonisation=medicine/health/water/sanitation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: geograph7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CASE STUDIESRELEVANCE OF THE DTM MODEL


1
CASE STUDIES/RELEVANCE OF THE DTM MODEL
  • Need to be able to
  • 1.Know about the DTM and how it applies to the
    UK/JAPAN
  • (developed world) and INDIA (developing
    world).
  • 2.Can it be reliably used to PREDICT past/future
    developments?
  • 3.In what ways does it link with POPULATION
    STRUCTURE?

2
DTM and the UK
  • Stage 1 until 1740 BR 30-40/000
  • DR a little lower (cheap GIN
    drinking)
  • Stage 21740-1880 DR falls to 20/000
    (food/sanitation/
  • water/smallpox 1798/Public
    Health Acts 1848/1875
  • BR stays high _at_ 30-35/000
  • Stage 3 1880-1920 BR falls to 15/000
    (birth control
  • information 1876,1914/1918
    WW1)
  • DR falls (National Insurance
    1911/TB treatments
  • via Local Councils
    1921/pension schemes)Rapidly
  • urbanised rather than rural
    society-ease of medical
  • treatments/hospitals/politic
    al-Suffragettes 1897.
  • Stage 4 Low BR/DR_at_ 15-20/000.
  • Some baby booms-post WW2 in
    1946.
  • Contraceptive Pill in 1963

3
Does the DTM workin the UK ?
  • NOTECompare your DTM in the UK graph
  • with the DTM expected graph on p151.
  • OVERALL TREND?GIVE EXAMPLES..QUOTE DATA
  • EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE?.WHEN?QUOTE DATAWHY?
  • CONCLUSION?
  • Help? For exceptions look _at_ 17201780.1820/60.19
    46Stage 5?

4
DTM IN MEDCS
  • Rate/000
  • B R
  • D R


  • Time

5
DTM IN LEDCS
  • Rate per 000
  • B R
  • D R

  • Time

6
DTM IN INDIA
  • POPULATION GROWTH (mil)
    CHANGES IN BR
    AND DR
  • 1000


    BR
  • 500


    DR
  • 1901
    2000
    1901
    2000

7
DTM IN INDIA
  • Stage 1pre-1920BR _at_ 50/000 DR _at_ 40/000
  • rural life/highly prized male
    children
  • Stage 21920-1985DR reduces _at_ 30/000 by 1942
  • BR remains high-massive natural
    increase
  • British colonisationmedicine/health
    /water/sanitation/
  • industrialisation/quality of
    food/technology/oppression/
  • independence in 1948.Over 50 pop
    below 15.
  • Stage 3Post-1985DR levelling off,BR high but
    starting to decline
  • so family size falling.987 millions
    population.N I _at_ 1.9
  • CBR28/000 CDR 9/000 (low compared
    to some European)
  • Still largely agricultural but
    increasing industrialisation
  • GNP 370 (in UK20,870)
  • Strong social/religious
    customswill BR fall further,quickly?

8
Does the DTM workin INDIA?
  • NoteCompare your DTM graph of India with
  • the expected DTM graph on p 151.
  • OVERALL TREND?..QUOTE EGS.DATA
  • EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE?..QUOTE
    EGS.DATAWHEN?.WHY?
  • CONCLUSIONS?
  • Note1901 BR/DR,1921-1981 constant fall of BR.no
    sign DR levelling

9
Does the DTM work .in JAPAN?
  • Rate per 000
  • 40

  • BR
  • 30

  • DR
  • 20
  • 1900
    1939
    2000

10
DTM IN JAPAN
  • STAGE 1pre-industrial society up until
    1870.Subsistence
  • economy.BR/DR _at_ 20/000 NI _at_
    1-1.6
  • STAGE 2urbanisation as Industrial Revolution hit
    Japan.
  • improvements in food
    suply/living conditions/
  • access to medical facilities led
    to increase in
  • BR to 35/000 in
    1920.Industrialisation/reduction in DR.
  • STAGE 3 1945-1979- boom post WW2/Eugenic
    Protection Laws in
  • 1960s/BR therefore drops
    dramatically/1966 is
  • year of Fire and
    Horse-unlucky-fewer still babies/
  • rapid post-war
    industrialisation/improving Q of L.
  • STAGE 41979 onwards BR/DR low-advanced
    Technological lifestyles.

11
Does the DTM work in JAPAN?
  • NoteCompare the DTM graph of Japan
  • with the expected DTM graph p 151.
  • OVERALL TREND.. QUOTE EGS..DATA
  • EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE?QUOTE EGS.DATA..WHAT..
    WHY
  • CONCLUSIONS?
  • Note1850 limited fluctuation BR/DR,1870 BR
    rise,fluctuating BR decline,
  • DR continuing to decline 2000,timescale
    of overall change?

12
DTM and POPULATIONSTRUCTURE
  • POPULATION STRUCTURENORMALLY REFERS TO THE

  • AGE/SEX PROFILE OF A

  • COUNTRY.CAN ALSO INCLUDE

  • RACE,LANGUAGE,RELIGION,

  • FAMILY SIZE.
  • AGE/SEX RATIOS normally shown via a POPULATION
    PYRAMID

13
Population Pyramid
  • AGE OF GROUPS
  • 15-29
  • 0- 14

14
The DTM and PopulationPyramids
  • 1.Predict the changes that should happen
  • to a countries Population Pyramid,as
  • it progresses through the expected
  • Demographic Transition Model.
  • 2.Draw your predicted changes to the Population
  • Pyramids of India,UK,Japan,for 2025 and 2050.
  • Are they correct? Compare with UN predictions
  • given out to you?

15
HOW RELIABLE THENIS THE DTM?
  • ESSAY
  • By reference to examples that you have studied at
    different scales of development,critically
    appraise the Demographic Transition Model.(25)

16
ESSAY TIPS
  • 1.Introduction. Refer to DTM.What it is,how it is
    supposed to be helpful to prediction
    NI/population structure change in a country/when
    developed/stages/dates/etc
  • 2.Refer to egs from MEDC.Stage by stage
    comparison of
  • each countries progress.Is there comparison
    with DTM/in
  • what way/is there disagreement/in what way?Why?
    Use FACTS
  • 3.Do the same for LEDC.
  • 4.Does it tend to work better for MEDC or LEDC?
    Use FACTS
  • 5.Overall conclusion?Why? Any better models? Any
    use for
  • predicting future trends?
  • http//www.uwmc.uwc.edu/geography/Demotrans/demtra
    n.htm
  • http//www.geocities.com/geogsoc2000/DTM.html
  • Or write in Demographic Transition Model into
    Google search engine,and start your own search.

17
REVIEWDEMOGRAPHIC TRANSITION MODEL
  • Simplistic model based upon the work of American
    Demographer Warren Thompson.(1929)
  • Not all countries/regions within countries pass
    through stages _at_ same
  • time/rate.
  • No account taken of base population size(a small
    NI in Chinamassive population growth!)
  • No account taken of the impact of Migration
  • Based largely upon western/consumerist/market
    led societies.
  • No account of external control/investment in a
    country (eg,Colonial power)
  • Heavily reliant upon economic factors,eg,GNP,to
    cause stage by stage changes
  • Under emphasis of culltural/political/social
    factors in stage by stage changes
  • Fairly accurate overall indicator of NI
    change.Therefore highly regarded model
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com