Key Elements for Stainless Steels - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Key Elements for Stainless Steels

Description:

Key Elements for Stainless Steels – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: Mich1107
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Key Elements for Stainless Steels


1
Key Elements for Stainless Steels
  • Chromium
  • Hexavalent cpds. Carcinogenic to humans
  • Trivalent cpds. Unclassifiable as to
    carcinogenicity to humans
  • Nickel
  • Insoluble cpds. Carcinogenic to humans
  • Manganese Neurological effects on humans
  • Explore occupational exposure limits for
  • manganese compounds
  • as these are topical components of welding fume

2
Manganese Inorganic Compounds Exposure Limit
  • Comparison of three derived limits from
  • ACGIH TLV proposal 2002
  • UK HSE WEL 2001
  • IEH/IOM OEL proposal 2004
  • (Criteria document for International Manganese
    Institute)

3
Definitions ACGIH Threshold Limit Value - TLV
  • Health-based
  • Conditions under which it is believed that
    nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed day
    after day without adverse health effects

4
Definitions HSE Workplace Exposure Limit - WEL
  • Maximum concentration of an airborne substance,
    averaged over a reference period, to which
    employees may be exposed by inhalation
  • Coupled with 8 Principles of Good Practice
  • Has regard to practicability and economics

5
IEH/IOM Occupational Exposure Limit OEL
  • Prepared according to EU guidelines
  • Health-based
  • Based on criteria document for EU SCOEL

6
Review References
  • ACGIH 57 references, more than 20 not cited in
    IEH/IOM
  • HSE 27 references, 15 not cited in ACGIH
  • IEH/IOM Approx. 575 references

7
Welding cited?
  • ACGIH No
  • HSE Yes, including
  • IEH/IOM consumables manufacture

8
Manganese Critical Factors Cited
  • Subclinical effects on central nervous system
  • Disturbance of motor function, loss of fine
    control of intentional movements
  • Adverse effects on fertility of male workers
    (ACGIH only)

9
Common Factors for Specifying OEL
  • Definition of
  • LOAEL Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level
  • NOAEL - No Observed Adverse Effect Level

10
Key Studies
11
Conclusion - ACGIH
  • Roels LOAEL 0.035 mg/m3 resp.
  • Lucchini LOAEL 0.097 mg/m3 inhal.
  • Assume respirable fraction Inhalable/2.6
  • Therefore LOAEL 0.037 mg/m3 resp.
  • Recommended TLV 0.03 mg/m3 resp.

12
Conclusion - HSE
  • Motor effects reported at
  • 0.251.6 mg/m3 Mn
  • Not possible to define LOAEL from
    exposure-response data
  • Health benefit value optimum (127M)
    achievable protection at 0.5 mg/m3 limit
  • Approved WEL 0.5 mg/m3

13
Conclusion IEH/IOM
  • Systemic effects come from respirable fraction
  • Supplementary inhalable limit required for
    possible but unproven gastrointestinal effects
  • Key studies allow NOAEL to be estimated
  • Recommended OEL 0.1 mg/m3 resp.
  • (Supplementary limit 0.5 mg/m3 inhal.)

14
Equivalent Exposure Limits
  • Inhalable exposure limits based on
  • Inhalable/Respirable 2.5 e.g. in MnO
    processing
  • ACGIH 0.075 mg/m3
  • HSE 0.5
  • IEH/IOM 0.25
  • Ratio 1 3.3 6.7

15
Exposure Limits - Welding
  • (all fume respirable)
  • ACGIH 0.03 mg/m3.
  • HSE 0.5
  • IEH/IOM 0.1
  • Ratio 1 3.3 16.7

16
Current Exposure Limits
17
Calculating Total Fume Limit
  • For substance A
  • Fume Limit 100 x OEL(A)
  • Concentration(A)

18
Total Fume Limits - MMA
  • For fume containing 5 CrVI, 5 Mn, 1Ni
  • UK 1 mg/m3
  • Netherlands 0.5 mg/m3
  • (Cr key component)

19
Total Fume Limits - MIG
  • For fume containing 16 Cr, 12 Mn, 8Ni
  • UK 3.3 mg/m3
  • Sweden 1.25 mg/m3
  • (Key component Cr for UK, Ni for Sweden)

20
Proposed Limits
21
Proposed Limits - Total Fume Limit
  • For fume containing 5 CrVI, 5 Mn, 1Ni

22
Exposures in Practice
  • 20 Duty cycle
  • Welders head out of plume LEV for
  • Total fume lt0.1 mg/m3
  • (Carter)
  • Shipyard exposures with or without LEV
  • CrVI 0.005 mg/m3
  • (Castner)

23
Exposure Limit Variation
  • Some reasons
  • Definition and legal status differ between
    countries
  • Revision periods vary e.g. OSHA PEL for Mn

24
Risk and OELs
  • Further reasons for variation
  • Definition of OEL requires
  • Risk assessment - Scientific (?)
  • Risk management Value judgement

25
Indicative Occupational Exposure Limit
  • Where an IOELV is established at Community
    level, Member States shall establish a national
    OEL, taking into account the Community limit, in
    accordance with national legislation and
    practice
  • Directive 98/24/EC

26
Practical Guidance
  • Few employers measure exposure
  • Netherlands specifies practical requirements for
    compliance with regulations
  • UK publishing guidance sheets based on good
    practice principles

27
Respiratory Protection
  • Filter helmet or Air-fed helmet

28
Conclusions
  • Need for coordination of exposure limits
  • Practicability must be taken into account
  • Compliance has to be supported by guidance
  • All welders need protection!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com