Chemical Inventory Accuracy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Chemical Inventory Accuracy

Description:

'For populations with high consequences, annual loss rate targets may be virtually 0 ... UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: jasonb92
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chemical Inventory Accuracy


1
Chemical Inventory Accuracy
  • Kathy Ertell
  • EFCOG Chemical Safety and Lifecycle Management
    Subgroup
  • EFCOG/DOE Chemical Safety Workshop
  • March 2008
  • Information Release Approval No. PNNL-SA-59328

2
EFCOG CSLM Subgroup, Inventory Accuracy Team
Tasks
  • Review inventory accuracy measurement methods
  • Determine what methods best apply to chemical
    inventories
  • Review relevant industry standards for inventory
    accuracy standards
  • Develop a recommended suite of methods and
    outcome expectations
  • Tasks still in progress ..

3
Questions under Consideration
  • What parameters of chemical inventory accuracy
    are important to consider location, volume,
    etc.?
  • Are all parameters equally important?
  • How often is it necessary to evaluate accuracy?
  • Is it necessary to assess the entire inventory,
    or can statistical samples work?
  • Can risk-based graded approaches work?
  • What expectations do management, regulators, DOE,
    have for accuracy levels?
  • What do the numbers really mean?

4
Inventory Accuracy Why Does It Matter?
  • Chemicals are sometimes regarded as property.
  • Property has a long history of conducting
    inventory assessments.
  • Data needs for environmental, safety, and health
    reporting regulatory and management
  • Inaccurate data in chemical inventory databases
    leads to inaccurate reporting
  • High hazard chemicals communicate and control
    risks to public, workers, facilities,
    stakeholders
  • Control of high value and high sensitivity
    chemicals

5
Items in Chemical Inventories
  • High Consequence
  • High value and/or
  • High hazard and/or
  • High sensitivity.
  • Ordinary chemicals
  • Low Consequence
  • Low hazard and/or
  • Low value and/or
  • Low sensitivity.

6
Standards and Practices
  • Few, if any, specific standards for chemical
    inventory accuracy.
  • Body of knowledge for property management,
    industrial acceptance sampling, and for auditing.
  • ASTM E2132-01 Standard Practices for Physical
    Inventories
  • DOE Order 580.1 Personal Property Management
  • Military standards

7
Property Management Methods
  • Wall-to-wall physical inventory required for some
    items ammunition, weapons
  • Inventory by exception labor saving, selected
    transactions
  • Statistical sampling approaches physical
    verification of accuracy by randomly selected
    records in property database
  • Witnessed inventory third party verification
  • Electronic inventory methods Sunflower Assets
    software, property owners certify their property.

8
Frequency of Property Inventories
  • Frequency is related to value and sensitivity
  • Equipment every 2 years
  • Sensitive items annually
  • Stores inventories annually
  • Precious metals annually
  • Fixed property every five years
  • Full physical inventories, some items every 10
    years
  • Statistical sampling if fail the stat sample
    audit, must do full physical inventory
    verification on the population.

9
Differences in Property Management and Chemical
Management
  • Number of items tracked in chemical inventories
    can be much larger than items tracked in property
    management
  • Many low value / low consequence chemicals
    tracked in chemical inventory - no correlates in
    property
  • Tracking movement of chemicals can be difficult
    in laboratory, maintenance environments
  • Fewer staff assigned to chemical management in
    many institutions

10
Statistical Approaches
  • Acceptance sampling widely used in manufacturing
    quality control and auditing accept/reject lots
    based on sampling
  • Whats the population?
  • Representative samples
  • All items/sets must be individually identified
  • All items need an equal chance of selection
  • Statistical approach can be as much or more work
    than a wall-to-wall physical inventory, depending
    on population size field verification is more
    time-consuming than wall-to-wall barcode shoots.

11
Whats Important to Measure
  • What do you mean by inventory accuracy?
  • What do you want to achieve?
  • Do you care about the accuracy of the entire
    inventory, or only certain types of items?
  • What attributes are most important to measure?
  • Location, building, room, container size, name of
    chemical, owner, volume?
  • Are all attributes equally important? Is a
    weighted scheme (more complex) needed?

12
Whats Important to Measure?
  • Varies according to priorities, applicable
    regulations, type of work, security level.
  • Inventory of high hazard chemicals present in
    significant quantities (reactive chemicals,
    Homeland Security, Emergency Preparedness rules)
    is important.
  • High value/high sensitivity chemicals - may be
    monitored by others (precious metals, controlled
    substances).
  • Fire zone compliance is important to many sites.
  • Accurate location is important to many users.

13
Accuracy Whats Acceptable for Property
  • ASTM E2123-01 (2007)
  • Annual loss rates measure relative property
    control success.
  • For populations with high consequences, annual
    loss rate targets may be virtually 0.
  • For populations with very low consequences,
    annual loss rates of as high as 10 may be
    acceptable.
  • Typical acceptable annual loss rates vary from
    0.5 to 5. (for property)

14
Accuracy Results- Whats Acceptable for Chemicals?
  • It depends
  • Do you measure before or after inventory
    reconciliation? Opinions, practices vary.
  • Before 75-80 may be acceptable for most items
    in a dynamic chemical inventory
  • Before gt 90 for high hazard/value/sensitive
    chemicals.
  • After 90 may be acceptable for most items in a
    dynamic chemical inventory, higher for fixed or
    process-based inventory
  • After gt 95 for high hazard/value/sensitive
    chemicals.

15
Why Not 100 Accuracy?
  • Not usually achievable might be achievable in
    some situations.
  • Large numbers of chemical containers.
  • Many chemicals are consumables.
  • Resources required would be large.
  • Technology to measure inventory accuracy on a
    real-time basis needed, but not available yet.
  • What if you dont meet the 100 target?
  • Might be better to set a realistic target,
    improve over time as you learn.

16
How to Measure Inventory Accuracy?
  • Wall-to-wall physical inventories are
    well-established practices.
  • Wall-to-wall inventories may be needed on some
    frequency to maintain accurate database, but
    resource-intensive.
  • Statistical sampling has a valuable role,
    especially with high numbers of items, where
    verification of all containers not feasible.
  • Graded approach high consequence items need to
    be inventoried differently and/or more often than
    the general chemical inventory.

17
Summary
  • Committee still reviewing options and approaches
  • Input from conference attendees is welcome.
  • Heres how we do it
  • Contact information
  • Kathy Ertell, katherine.ertell_at_pnl.gov,
  • 509-371-7881
  • Leslie Soderquist, Leslie.Soderquist_at_icp.doe.gov
  • 208-526-0437

18
Disclaimer
  • This report was prepared as an account of work
    sponsored by an agency of the
  • United States Government. Neither the United
    States Government nor any agency
  • thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any
    of their employees, makes any
  • warranty, express or implied, or assumes any
    legal liability or responsibility
  • for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of
    any information, apparatus,
  • product, or process disclosed, or represents that
    its use would not infringe
  • privately owned rights. Reference herein to any
    specific commercial product,
  • process, or service by trade name, trademark,
    manufacturer, or otherwise does not
  • necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,
    recommendation, or favoring by
  • the United States Government or any agency
    thereof, or Battelle Memorial
  • Institute. The views and opinions of authors
    expressed herein do not necessarily
  • state or reflect those of the United States
    Government or any agency thereof.
  • PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY
  • operated by
  • BATTELLE
  • for the
  • UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
  • under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830

19
Questions ?Comments ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com