First Responders and Emergency Communications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

First Responders and Emergency Communications

Description:

The definition developed by the National Task Force on Interoperability and ... By land or sea from the town to-night, Hang a lantern aloft in the belfry arch ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: jwa58
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: First Responders and Emergency Communications


1
First Responders and Emergency Communications
  • James Wadsworth
  • Fairfax County, Virginia
  • Radio Services Center Manager

2
Definition of Interoperability
  • The definition developed by the National Task
    Force on Interoperability and refined by Project
    SAFECOM describes interoperability as, "The
    ability of public-safety agencies to communicate
    with one another via radio communications systems
    - to exchange voice and/or data with one another
    on demand, in real time, when needed and when
    authorized."

3
Definition of Interoperability
  • The ability to communicate with one another
  • To exchange voice and/or data with one another on
    demand, in real time, when needed and when
    authorized

4
The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere by Henry
Wadsworth Longfellow
  • Listen my children and you shall hearOf the
    midnight ride of Paul Revere,On the eighteenth
    of April, in Seventy-fiveHardly a man is now
    aliveWho remembers that famous day and year.
  • He said to his friend, "If the British marchBy
    land or sea from the town to-night,Hang a
    lantern aloft in the belfry archOf the North
    Church tower as a signal light,--One if by land,
    and two if by seaAnd I on the opposite shore
    will be,Ready to ride and spread the
    alarmThrough every Middlesex village and
    farm,For the country folk to be up and to arm."

5
The Department of Homeland Security Described 6
levels of Interoperability
  • Level-1  Swap Radios
  • The simplest and most basic level of
    interoperability is the physical exchange of
    radios with other agencies involved in an event. 

6
Level-2  Talkaround or Directed Net
  • Talkaround provides interoperability where
    multiple radio users talk radio-to-radio on the
    same transmit and receive frequency in the
    conventional mode.  In this situation,
    communications are tightly bound by the air
    interface the same frequency is required and
    transmissions are digital-to-digital or
    analog-to-analog, not analog-to-digital.
  •  

7
Level-3  Mutual Aid 
  •  
  • Mutual aid channels provide operability for first
    responder radios and interoperability between
    radios within the same frequency band?i.e. VHF
    users can only talk to (or on) other VHF
    systems.  The effectiveness of Mutual Aid Level-3
    can only be achieved through adherence to
    predetermined protocols and procedures as part of
    the National Incident Command System (NIMS) which
    is used in the event of an emergency. 

8
Level-4  Gateway (Console Patch)
  • A gateway is a generic term for devices that
    connect multiple frequency bands and/or coverage
    areas and thereby provide interoperability
    between them.  Overlapping coverage areas may use
    wired or wireless gateway devices.  For
    overlapping coverage areas operating in different
    frequency bands, wireless gateway devices provide
    cross-band interoperability for the radios
    (require separate Transmit Receivers (T/R)
    frequencies).  For overlapping or non overlapping
    coverage areas, wireline interconnectivity also
    can be used to provide cross-band operation for
    the radio users while also providing connectivity
    to and/or between dispatchers and systems. 
    Gateway devices may be used to provide wireline
    or wireless interoperability between the coverage
    areas of Mutual Aid channels or existing systems
    or a combination of both.  These systems and
    coverage areas may be single-site or multi-site,
    analog or digital, conventional or trunked,
    proprietary or standards based.  Interoperability
    will be limited to the lowest common capability
    that these systems provide. 

9
Level-5  System-Specific-Roaming  
  • Additional interoperable capabilities for first
    responder incident management can be provided by
    leveraging existing systems using mutual aid talk
    groups.  These systems typically have more
    capabilities and greater capacity than Mutual Aid
    channels.  A greater level of interoperability
    for first responders can be achieved by
    leveraging the existing systems.  These systems
    may be in a variety of frequency bands, may be
    analog or digital and conventional or trunked. 
    Existing systems are owned by specific agencies
    and may come from a variety of vendors. 

10
Level-6  Standards Based Shared Systems
  •  
  • Standard based systems ensure that the radios
    and/or the infrastructures use technology and
    messages that are interoperable regardless of the
    equipment vendor.  By sharing standards based
    systems with first responders, a greater level of
    interoperable features with greater capacity can
    be achieved.  Level-6 systems may be conventional
    or trunked, single or multi-site.  They must be
    based on the P25 CAI standards (ANSI/TIA/EIA-102)
    and conform to SAFECOM interoperability
    standards. 

11
Those who can not remember the past are doomed to
repeat it. George Santayana (1863 - 1952),
  • Examples Of Past Events And How Interoperable
    Communications Played A Part.

12
January 13th, 1982
  • There was a major snowstorm that was covering the
    Washington, D.C. area with considerable
    accumulation, and there was an early release of
    federal employees, and heavy strain on the
    region's transportation system.

13
Air Florida Flight 90
  • Air Florida flight 90 had taken off from
    Washington DC Airport and due to wing icing and
    pilot error, the aircraft lost altitude and
    crashed into the 14th Street Bridge and the
    Potomac River less than a mile from the airport.
    There were only 5 survivors out of 79 people on
    board. The aircraft descended nose-high and
    tail-low, and at 401 PM, the tail struck the
    deck and parapet of the Rochambeau Bridge (the
    northbound span), struck seven vehicles, killed 4
    motorists and injured 4 motorists, and went into
    the frozen river between the Rochambeau Bridge
    and the express span (they are a couple hundred
    yards apart). The aircraft shattered the surface
    ice, and broke into multiple large pieces which
    quickly sank into the river. Traffic was already
    stopped in a traffic jam, due to the storm.
    Between the effects of the storm, and the rescue
    efforts around the 14th Street (I-395/US-1)
    bridges, the 12-lane complex ceased to function,
    and closed to traffic. The George Washington
    Parkway, which parallels the Potomac River in
    Virginia, also closed near the crash site.

14
Metrorail Fire
  • A rapid rail transit accident occurred about one
    half hour after the air crash. At 430 PM, one
    car of a WMATA Metrorail train derailed while the
    train was being backed up through a crossover
    switch south of the Federal Triangle Station in
    D.C., and the car was pulled sideways and it
    crashed into the concrete pillar separating the
    inbound and outbound subway tunnels. A misaligned
    switch at Smithsonian Interlocking caused the
    rear wheel truck to derail, and the wheels
    tracked alongside of the rails for 171 feet,
    following the opposite track, until the car
    impacted the concrete pillar. There were 3
    fatalities, and 25 injuries.

15
Metrorail Fire
  • The crash occurred on the Blue/Orange Line, and
    resulted in the both lines being shut down. At
    that time, the Blue Line ran from National
    Airport Station in Arlington to Addison Road
    Station in Maryland, and the Orange Line ran from
    Ballston Station in Arlington to New Carrolton
    Station in Maryland. The derailment occurred on
    the section where the two lines share the same
    cross-town subway route, and the wrecked subway
    car blocked both tracks. The other (then) open
    line, the Red Line, was not affected.

16
Summary
  • So in a one hour period, the D.C. area lost the
    use of its (at that time) busiest airport,
    busiest expressway, and busiest subway line. The
    (by far) widest/busiest bridge from D.C. to
    Virginia closed, and the one rapid rail transit
    line from D.C. to Virginia closed. This was a
    true area-wide transportation disaster, a major
    chunk of the air, highway, and rail system
    closed.

17
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSIONPUBLIC SAFETY
NATIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEENovember 16,
2001comments by Mr. Steve Souder
  • The crash of Air Florida flight 90 created a
    tremendous outpouring of public safety response
    to that horrific event. And, unfortunately, it
    didn't go well. It was communications gridlock to
    the nth degree. Everybody that was there had
    good intentions, everybody that was there wanted
    to do good. But everybody that was there couldn't
    talk to each other.
  • You had every imaginable frequency, and every
    imaginable brand and type of radio, and every
    imaginable kind of agency converging on that
    snowy riverbank, on that January afternoon at
    430. It was a mess. But what it did was to
    reinforce what public safety had been saying,
    both to Congress, and to the Commission, for at
    least the previous four years. That then, as now,
    public safety needs more spectrum on which to
    operate, and more common spectrum on which to
    operate.

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
Interoperability A Local PerspectiveTestimony
by Chief Michael P. NeuhardFairfax County Fire
and Rescue Departmentbefore the House Government
Reform Subcommittee on Technology,Information
Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and the
CensusWednesday, September 8, 2004
  • Interoperability is a critical issue for the
    emergency services police, fire, and emergency
    management. It must be remembered that
    interoperability is not just about technology. In
    fact, it has been said that interoperability is
    really 80 percent communication and coordination
    in various forms, and only 20 percent technical.
  • Critical components of emergency response systems
    which are interoperable, but not technical,
    include
  • ?? common incident management techniques
  • ??common terminology
  • ??common policy and procedures
  • ??standardized training
  • ??compatible equipment such as protective
    clothing, metering devices, selfcontained
    breathing apparatus
  • ?? common hose threads for firefighting, and
  • redundant methods of communications

21
Conclusion
  • Know what tools are in your toolbox
  • Practice with your tools
  • Practice with your neighbors using your tools
  • Practice again
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com