Title: Include Customer Value in Lean Six Sigma
1Include Customer Value in Lean Six Sigma
Harry E. Cook, Ph.D. harrycook66_at_yahoo.com
8th Annual Lean Six Sigma and Process Improvement
in Healthcare March 18 19, 2008
Intercontinental Hotel, New Orleans
2Topics Covered
- The Fundamental Financial Metrics
- Value Assessment Tools
- How to Include Value in Design of Experiments
- The Payoff
3The Fundamental Metrics
-
- There are three Fundamental Financial Metrics
that define the Prospects of each New, Innovative
Idea - Value,
- Cost,
- Pace of Innovation.
- They control the score cards for the
Bottom-line Metrics of Demand, - Price,
- Profit.
4Lean Six Sigma Today
The full strategic power of the Lean Six Sigma is
not being realized. Root cause Customer Value
(Value) in dollars is not used in forecasting
demand, price, and profit of new innovative ideas
early in the planning process.
5Timeline for ForecastingJob 1 Financials
Start of Planning Many Competing Ideas
Job 1
Forecast the Bottom-line Metrics of for the
Competing Ideas using the three Fundamental
Financial Metrics
Actual Bottom-line Is a Lagging Metric
6The Fundamental Metrics Quantify the
Competitiveness of a New Idea
- Value (To the Customer) is computed from
customers willingness to pay for improvements in
Critical To Value (CTV) attributes of the product
or service. - Cost (To the Company) includes all aspects
associated with lean such as minimal inventory,
elimination of waste, plant efficiency, supply
chain efficiency, piece cost, etc. - Pace of Innovation is the reciprocal (1/t) of the
time (t) needed to take a new idea from concept
to production.
7Defining Customer ValueUsing Demand Curve
Demand
Value 20 The price where demand goes to zero
0
20
Price
8Proof of Definition of Value from Demand Curve
(Willingness to Pay for Two 100 Lottery Tickets
with different odds )
P is the price of the ticket. EEV is the
expected economic value of the 100 lottery
tickets. 50 50 80 80
9How the Fundamental Financial Metrics Couple to
the Bottom-line Metrics
Customer and societal value are determined
outside the company by its customers and by
society. Inside the company there are only
costs. (Peter Drucker)
10Four Simple Questions to Support Decision Making
When Considering a New Idea
11How Value and Cost Influencethe Target for a CTV
Attribute
Target is where V C is maximum.
12How Value is Affected by Variation
- Continuous CTV attributes are almost always
concave which causes manufacturing variation to
lower value.
13Relation to Taguchi Methods
The Value curve and Taguchis CIQ are Inverse to
Each Other.
14What Attributes are Critical to Value?
15A Generic Set of CTV AttributesExists for all
Products and Services!
- Five senses (visual appeal, odor, sound/noise,
touch, taste) - Time between events (turn-on to run, start of
task to finish) - Friendliness (ease of learning how to operate)
- Robustness quality (insensitive to variation)
- Dimensions (volume, moment of inertia, weight,
etc.) - Legal/Ethical (Federal Social standards)
- Safety (injury minor, moderate, severe, fatal)
- Longevity quality (product life and patient life)
- Environmental impact (on air, water, soil)
- Operating costs (reduce customer value)
This is an Incomplete List!
16Some Healthcare CTV Attributes
- Access to doctors office or hospital
- Friendliness of receptionist
- Wait time for patient
- Waiting room amenities (seat comfort, noise
level, beverages, Wi-Fi, etc.) - Length of stay
- Quality of diagnosis
- Quality of treatment
- Time to recover
- Annual cost of medications to patient
- Speed to Mitigate Crisis
- Mortality rate
17An Increase in Value minus Cost Increases Demand,
Price, and Cash Flow
Annual cash flow
18How to Quantify Value
- 1. Surveys
- 2. Computations
- 3. Internal Company Estimates
- 4. Analysis of Trends in Demand Price of
Competing Products and Services
19The Direct Value (DV) Survey
The DV survey determines the neutral price PN for
an alternative relative to a baseline at a fixed
price P0. The neutral price is the price of the
alternative which makes the two demands equal in
the survey. The relative value ?V of the
alternative in is equal to ?V PN P0.
20A Simulated Survey for Brand Name Value
BRAND X
Assume you are in the market for a Vital Signs
Monitor. For each paired price comparison,
select the monitor on the left or the one on the
right.
21Proprietary Brand Name Value Survey
22The Plot (Logit form) for Determining the
Neutral Price for Alternate Brand A
Here the neutral price is less than the baseline
price which shows that the total value of Brand A
less than the baseline machine.
23Actual Results for Relative Brand Name Valuesof
the Earthmoving Equipment
24Softer Side of Value
- The products of a major earth moving equipment
maker has had a long term value advantage with
respect to competitors. - CTV performance attributes of equipment are about
the same. - Added value comes from
- 1. DEEP DEALER KNOWLEDGE in getting customers
into right product for the job at hand. - 2. FAST REPAIRS in the field.
25Value of Interior Noise DV Survey delivered on
computer screen
26Value Curve Outcome Car Interior Noise at 70 mph
From Computer DV Survey
27Computation of Value of Fuel Economy Relative to
25 mpg Baseline (3.50/gal)
28Empirical Form for Value Curve
Exponential weighting coefficient. It is
approximately equal to the fraction of time the
attribute is important during use.
A parabolic function of CTV attribute.
29Empirical parameters for 3 Value
Curves(Automotive Examples)
Interior noise critical and ideal levels were
from human factor studies and gamma was from best
fit to DV survey results.
Acceleration critical and ideal levels were from
jury evaluations and gamma was from best fit to
DV survey results.
Turning radius critical and ideal levels radius
were from company internal jury evaluations and
gamma was also from jury evaluation.
30Total Value Trends from Demand Price Analysis
Chrysler introduces all-new design plus second
rear sliding door (worth 1,250 in value!).
mvA is Chrysler mvB is Ford
All-new Windstar replaces Aerostar.
31Introducing Value into Design of Experiments
(DOE)
32Analysis of a DOE for Maximizing Value(Value
Only used for Simplicity)
CTV Attributes
Control Factor Levels
CTV 1 CTV2 Net
Trial Factor A Factor B Factor C
Mean Var. Mean Var. Value
X 1 2 1
6 1.2 15 2
20
1. The control factors are varied according to
the experimental design (OA). 2. The mean and
variance of the affected CTV attributes are
measured for each trial. 3. The
value curve for each CTV attribute is used to
compute value for each trial as a function of the
mean and variance. 4. Using linear algebra, the
influence of each factor on value is computed to
determine which combination yields max value.
(Log value is used to improve additivity.)
33RECALL The Fundamental and Bottom-line Metrics
are Coupled in two never ending Loops
34Summarizing using DMAIC
- Define The never-ending problem is that Your
Value is too Low, Your Costs are too High, and
Your Speed is too Slow. - Measure Value, Cost, Speed versus Competition.
- Analyze Status of CTV Attributes versus
Competition. - Improve CTV Attributes because they improve the
Bottom-line Metrics. - Control Make Control of CTV attributes part of
Standard Work.