Status Of Implementation Of Municipal Solid Waste (Management

1
Status Of Implementation Of Municipal Solid Waste
(Management Handling) Rules, 2000 In Class-i
Cities Of India As On 31/12/2003.
2
PRESENTATION BY P. U. ASNANIURBAN ENVIRONMENT
INFRASTRUCTURE REPRESENTATIVE, INDIAUSAEP/US-AID
Education for a Sustainable FutureCEEAhmedabad
18TH JANUARY, 2005
3
MANDATORY DIRECTIONS CONTAINED IN THE MSWM RULES
4
PROHIBIT LITTERING OF WASTE ON THE STREETS

• i.e.
• STORAGE OF WASTE
• AT SOURCE

5
(No Transcript)
6
PRIMARY COLLECTION OF WASTE FROM THE DOORSTEP
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
DAILY STREET SWEEPING
12
(No Transcript)
13
ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE STORAGE SITES
14
(No Transcript)
15
TRANSPORTATION OF WASTE IN COVERED VEHICLES
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
PROCESSING OF WASTE BY COMPOSTING OR POWER
GENERATION
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
DISPOSAL OF NON-BIODEGRADABLES ONLY AT THE
SANITARY LANDFILL SITES
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
STATUS OF COMPLIANCE
29
STORAGE OF WASTE AT SOURCE IN INDIA
30
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2004 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2004 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2004 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2004
STORAGE OF WASTE AT SOURCE STORAGE OF WASTE AT SOURCE STORAGE OF WASTE AT SOURCE STORAGE OF WASTE AT SOURCE
PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCE NO. OF CITIES COMPLIANCE 50 OR MORE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50
100 8 50 78
BETWEEN 75 100 12 50 78
BETWEEN 50 75 30 50 78
BETWEEN 25 50 25 50 78
BETWEEN 10 25 25 50 78
BETWEEN 0 10 4 50 78
ONLY 0 12 50 78
NA 12 50 78
TOTAL 128 50 78
31
(No Transcript)
32

• STORAGE OF WASTE AT SOURCE
• CONSTRAINTS
• Lack of public awareness, motivation,
  education
• Lack of civic sense, bad habits of the people to
  litter
• Non cooperation from households, trade and
  commerce
• Lack of powers to levy spot fines
• Lack of stringent panel provision
• Lack of litter bins in the city
• Long distance between 2 community bins
• Resistance to change in attitude
• Lack of funds

33
SEGREGATION OF RECYCLABLE WASTE AT SOURCE
34
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
SEGREGATION OF RECYCLABLE WASTE SEGREGATION OF RECYCLABLE WASTE SEGREGATION OF RECYCLABLE WASTE SEGREGATION OF RECYCLABLE WASTE
PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCE NO. OF CITIES COMPLIANCE 50 OR MORE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50
100 2 44 84
BETWEEN 75 100 13 44 84
BETWEEN 50 75 29 44 84
BETWEEN 25 50 23 44 84
BETWEEN 10 25 22 44 84
BETWEEN 0 10 5 44 84
ONLY 0 25 44 84
NA 9 44 84
TOTAL 128 44 84
35
(No Transcript)
36

• SEGREGATION OF RECYCLABLE WASTE AT SOURCE
• CONSTRAINTS
• Lack of wide publicity through electronic and
  print media
• Lack of public awareness, motivation, poor
  response from the citizens
• Inadequate response from rag-pickers
• Difficult to educate slum dwellers
• Citizens not willing to spend for separate bin
  for recyclables
• Lack of sufficient knowledge on benefits of
  segregation
• Lack of finances to create awareness
• People not cooperating, Negative attitude of the
  people.
• Lack of effective legal remedy
• Lack of facilities

37
PRIMARY COLLECTION OF WASTE FROM THE DOORSTEP
38
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
PRIMARY COLLECTION FROM THE DOORSTEP PRIMARY COLLECTION FROM THE DOORSTEP PRIMARY COLLECTION FROM THE DOORSTEP PRIMARY COLLECTION FROM THE DOORSTEP
PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCE NO. OF CITIES COMPLIANCE 50 OR MORE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50
100 8 42 86
BETWEEN 75 100 15 42 86
BETWEEN 50 75 19 42 86
BETWEEN 25 50 31 42 86
BETWEEN 10 25 17 42 86
BETWEEN 0 10 7 42 86
ONLY 0 21 42 86
NA 10 42 86
TOTAL 128 42 86
39
(No Transcript)
40

• COLLECTION OF WASTE FROM THE DOORSTEPS
• CONSTRAINTS
• Lack of awareness and lack of motivation
• Non availability of primary collection vehicle
  and equipments
• Lack of financial Resources
• Difficulty in motivating slum dwellers
• Insufficient response from Citizens
• Lack of manpower
• Non availability of Containerized

41
DAILY STREET SWEEPING
42
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
DAILY STREET SWEEPING DAILY STREET SWEEPING DAILY STREET SWEEPING DAILY STREET SWEEPING
PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCE NO. OF CITIES COMPLIANCE 50 OR MORE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50
100 35 101 27
BETWEEN 75 100 33 101 27
BETWEEN 50 75 33 101 27
BETWEEN 25 50 11 101 27
BETWEEN 10 25 3 101 27
BETWEEN 0 10 0 101 27
ONLY 0 1 101 27
NA 12 101 27
TOTAL 128 101 27
43
(No Transcript)
44

• DAILY SWEEPING OF STREETS
• CONSTRAINTS
• Shortage of Manpower
• Excessive leave and absenteeism of Sanitary
  Workers
• No works on Sundays and Public holidays
• Kuchha roads
• Lack of Financial Resources

45
ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE STORAGE DEPOT/PROVISION
OF CLOSED CONTAINER
46
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE STORAGE SITE (INTRODUCING CLOSED CONTAINERS OR OTHER DEVICES) ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE STORAGE SITE (INTRODUCING CLOSED CONTAINERS OR OTHER DEVICES) ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE STORAGE SITE (INTRODUCING CLOSED CONTAINERS OR OTHER DEVICES) ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE STORAGE SITE (INTRODUCING CLOSED CONTAINERS OR OTHER DEVICES)
PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCE NO. OF CITIES COMPLIANCE 50 OR MORE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50
100 5 38 90
BETWEEN 75 100 10 38 90
BETWEEN 50 75 23 38 90
BETWEEN 25 50 12 38 90
BETWEEN 10 25 20 38 90
BETWEEN 0 10 1 38 90
ONLY 0 43 38 90
NA 14 38 90
TOTAL 128  
47
(No Transcript)
48

• ABOLITION OF OPEN WASTE STORAGE DEPOTS
• CONSTRAINTS
• Shortage of Containers
• Lack of Financial Resources
• Lack of Planning of Waste Storage Depots
• Inaccessible Areas/Narrow lanes difficult to
  put containers

49
TRANSPORTATION OF WASTE IN COVERED VEHICLES
50
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION
PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCE NO. OF CITIES COMPLIANCE 50 OR MORE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50
100 27 69 59
BETWEEN 75 100 18 69 59
BETWEEN 50 75 24 69 59
BETWEEN 25 50 8 69 59
BETWEEN 10 25 10 69 59
BETWEEN 0 10 0 69 59
ONLY 0 30 69 59
NA 11 69 59
TOTAL 128  
51
(No Transcript)
52

• TRANSPORTATION OF WASTE IN COVERED VEHICLES
• CONSTRAINTS
• Lack of Financial resources to purchase covered
  vehicles
• Insufficient vehicles
• Old vehicles difficult to replace
• Lack of exposure to new technologies

53
PROCESSING OF WASTE
54
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
PROCESSING OF WASTE PROCESSING OF WASTE PROCESSING OF WASTE PROCESSING OF WASTE
PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCE NO. OF CITIES COMPLIANCE 50 OR MORE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50
100 4 10 118
BETWEEN 75 100 2 10 118
BETWEEN 50 75 4 10 118
BETWEEN 25 50 5 10 118
BETWEEN 10 25 7 10 118
BETWEEN 0 10 5 10 118
ONLY 0 95 10 118
NA 6 10 118
TOTAL 128  
55
(No Transcript)
56

• PROCESSING OF WASTE
• CONSTRAINTS
• Lack of Financial Resources
• Lack of Technical know how
• Difficult to find appropriate technology for
  treatment of waste
• Lack of skilled Manpower
• Nonavailability of appropriate land/ Land
  acquisition Time consuming
• Low quality of Municipal waste
• Insufficient organic matter
• Lack of Basic facilities to setup Treatment
  Plants

57
DISPOSAL OF WASTE AT THE ENGINEERED LANDFILL
58
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005 STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF MSW RULES 2000 IN 106 CLASS-I CITIES AS ON 01/04/2005
CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY LANDFILLS CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY LANDFILLS CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY LANDFILLS CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY LANDFILLS
PERCENTAGE OF COMPLIANCE NO. OF CITIES COMPLIANCE 50 OR MORE COMPLIANCE BELOW 50
100 0 1 127
BETWEEN 75 100 1 1 127
BETWEEN 50 75 0 1 127
BETWEEN 25 50 2 1 127
BETWEEN 10 25 1 1 127
BETWEEN 0 10 1 1 127
ONLY 0 116 1 127
NA 7 1 127
TOTAL 128  
59
(No Transcript)
60

• DISPOSAL OF WASTE AT THE ENGINEERED LANDFILL
• CONSTRAINTS
• Lack of Financial Resources
• Lack of Financial Support
• Landfill Technologies very expensive and
  unaffordable
• Lack of Technical Staff
• Lack of Technical know how for scientific
  disposal of waste
• Nonavailability of appropriate land
• Delay in clearance of disposal sites
• Acquisition of land

61
OBTAINING AUTHORIZATION FROM STATE PCBs
62
AUTHORIZATION FROM STATE PCBs AUTHORIZATION FROM STATE PCBs
STATUS NO. OF CITIES
 
AUTHORIZATION OBTAINED 33
APPLIED 41
NOT MOVED 39
NA 15
TOTAL 128
63
(No Transcript)
64
STATUS OF AREA OF THE LANDFILL SITES AVAILABLE IN
ACRES
65
STATUS OF AREA OF THE LANDFILL AVAILABLE IN ACRES STATUS OF AREA OF THE LANDFILL AVAILABLE IN ACRES STATUS OF AREA OF THE LANDFILL AVAILABLE IN ACRES STATUS OF AREA OF THE LANDFILL AVAILABLE IN ACRES STATUS OF AREA OF THE LANDFILL AVAILABLE IN ACRES STATUS OF AREA OF THE LANDFILL AVAILABLE IN ACRES
S. NO. CITY POPULATION (2001) IN LAKHS Land required for treatment disposal _at_ of 18 acres/1 Lakh population Area of the land available Shortfall or excess in land
1 Pune 25.400 457.200 43.000 -414.200
2 Surat 24.330 437.940 500.000 62.060
3 Nagpur 21.000 378.000 55.000 -323.000
4 Indore 16.250 292.500 136.000 -156.500
5 Vadodara 14.924 268.632 9.000 -259.632
6 Agra 12.590 226.620 21.250 -205.370
7 Nashik 10.640 191.520 72.000 -119.520
8 Kalyan-Dombivli 10.614 191.057 31.250 -159.807
9 Rajkot 10.200 183.600 100.000 -83.600
66
CONSOLIDATED PICTURE OF COMPLIANCE
67
(No Transcript)
68
WAY FORWARD.