Title: UMR Statistical Analysis
1UMR Statistical Analysis
- Inland Navigation Appointment System Study
- Upper Mississippi River Locks 20-25
- Center For Transportation Studies
- University Of Missouri, St. Louis
- 15 June 2005
2Phases of UMR Statistical Analysis
- Produce performancebenchmarks with OMNI data
under historical operating rules and physical
conditions - Create system for development and maintenance of
sets of statistical models to support enhanced
simulation of UMR traffic flows and lockage
operations - Provide comparisons of simulated system
performance under alternative operating
procedures against historical bench marks
3Performance Bench Marks
- System status through the shipping season
- Monthly time-weighted averages and monthly
maxima for - Number of vessels queued for lockage at each lock
(upbound and downbound) - Status of locks (percentage of time busy versus
idle) - Number of vessels under way in each river pool
between locks (upbound and downbound)
4Performance Bench Marks (Continued)
- Lock operations
- Time spent waiting by vessels from arrival at
lock to beginning of lockage - Time spent by vessels in lockage operation
- Throughputs of vessels and tows
- Vessel transit time
- From completion of current lockage to arrival for
next lockage - Vessel itineraries for selected periods
- Generated for chosen vessels for comparison
against actual vessel tracking data - validation
of OMNI data
5General Observations From Descriptive Statistics
for 2003
- Based on 104,730 records of non-recreational
lockage records for the UMR system - Average utilization (percentage of times locks
were engaged serving vessels) peaked in summer
months at values between 74 and 79 for locks 20
through 25 - Maximum queues for lockage ranged between six and
eight vessels with tows - Vessels spent 1.5 of their time (from first
recorded UMR lockage to last recorded UMR lockage
in the shipping season) waiting for lockage
somewhere in the UMR system and 1.7 of their
time undergoing lockage somewhere in the UMR
system
6General Observations (Continued)
- While there were considerable delays in locking
vessels in the congested areas of the river, the
delays constitute a small percentage of the
annual vessel operation times - Limited potential of increasing the utilization
of towboat resources by - using alternative sequencing rules
- or increasing lock capacity at the five
bottleneck locks - unless volumes of river traffic increase
substantially above 2003 levels
7Analytical Issues
- Seasonal variation in numbers of tows,
characteristics of tows and efficiency of lock
operations - Extent to which OMNI data accurately reflect
vessel movements and lockage operations - Interpretation of start lockage times at various
locks - Possible variation in the reporting points for
vessel arrivals at locks (with alleged tendency
to call in at an earlier point when there are
several vessels ahead) - Occasional data entry errors or omissions
- Single vessel numbers recorded for lockages of
several vessels
8Analytical Issues (Continued)
- Extent to which vessels currently reduce speed
to save fuel when delays at locks are
anticipated - Extent to which delays are caused by impairments
at locks (due to weather or other causes) - Extent to which transit times are affected by
other river conditions
9Alternative Structures For Enhanced Simulation
Model
- Initial version (December, 2004)
- All tows except recreational vessels cycle
through the entire section of the river between
Lock 25 and Lock 20. - Recreational vessels are generated randomly for
lockages according to seasonal patterns
10Alternative Structures For Enhanced Simulation
Model (Continued)
- Enhancement Level 1 (June 2005)
- Vessels enter the system northbound at Lock 25
randomly according to seasonal patterns and
southbound at Lock 20 randomly according to
seasonal patterns. Alternative configurations
are (1) double, (2) single, (3) single with
jackknife lockage, (4) single with knockout
lockage, or (5) other, including recreational - At each intermediate lock, a vessel may either
(1) continue to the next lock in the same
configuration, or (2) be removed from the system
and handled through random generation of other
vessels that appear for lockage according to
seasonal patterns
11Alternative Structures For Enhanced Simulation
Model (Continued)
- Enhancement Level 2 (future implementation)
- Vessels enter the system northbound at Lock 25
randomly according to seasonal patterns and
southbound at Lock 20 randomly according to
seasonal patterns - At each intermediate lock, a vessel may either
(1) continue to the next lock in the same
configuration, (2) stop for possible change in
configuration and proceed in the same direction
to the next lock, (3) stop for possible change in
configuration and return to the same lock for
lockage in the opposite direction, or (4) be
removed from the system and handled through
random generation of other vessels that appear
for lockage according to seasonal patterns
12Statistical Models To Support The Enhanced
Simulation Models
- Logistic models for likelihoods of alternative
dispositions of each vessel (transition
probabilities) after completion of lockage - Give likelihoods of transition to alternative
configurations and locations of next lockage - Regression models for average time required to
complete the lockage of a vessel - Regression models for average transit times (from
completion of current lockage to arrival for next
lockage) - Total transit times in pools, including stop
times for vessels that stop en route from current
lockage to location of next lockage
13Factors Considered in Statistical Models
- In logistical models for determining next lockage
location and tow configuration - Month of year
- Current tow configuration
- In regression models for average lockage time
- Month of year
- Tow configuration (double, single, jackknife or
knockout) - Proportion of lockage that occurs at night
(suppressed in current version of simulation
model) - Whether exchange or turn-back occurs
14Factors Considered in Statistical Models
(Continued)
- In regression models for average transit time
- Month of year
- Changes in tow configuration and location of next
lockage - Percent of journey occurring at night (suppressed
for current version of simulation model) - Percent of journey during which impairment is
experienced at the next lock (suppressed for
current version of the simulation model)
15System For Generating and Updating Statistical
Models
- Written as SAS (Statistical Analysis System)
macros that generate model equations and
automatically write them to ASCII files for
importation into the simulation model
16System For Generating and Updating Statistical
Models
- Macro parameters allow user to determine
- Lists of possible explanatory variables to be
used in constructing models - Levels of statistical significance required for
individual explanatory variables - Beginning and ending dates of data used to
calibrate the models - continued
17System For Generating and Updating Statistical
Models (Continued)
- Percentiles to be used for screening out unusual
(extreme) observations when constructing
regression models (e.g., Excluding observations
below the 1st percentile or above the 99th
percentile) - Whether to include recreational lockages in
developing equations for lockage times - Whether to produce corresponding random arrival
rates (and average inter-arrival times) and
distributions of configuration types at monthly
or weekly intervals for each direction at each
lock
18Incorporation of Information re Ambient River
Conditions and Lock Impairments
- Seasonal distributions of times between
breakdowns at locks and duration of breakdowns at
locks - Incorporated into the simulation model as
independent events at each lock according to
seasonal data - Consideration of sunrise and sunset times in
determining the percentage of time that an
activity occurs in daylight (or conversely, at
night) - Allowed in some statistical models but yet not
incorporated into the simulation model - continued
19Incorporation of Information re Ambient River
Conditions and Lock Impairments (Continued)
- Consideration of the percentage of vessel
transit time that occurred during an impairment
at the destination lock - Allowed in some statistical models
- Not incorporated into the simulation model
- Water level data and flow rates did not
materially enhance the statistical models and
were not complete for all pools