Pluripotent Stem Cells - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 63
About This Presentation
Title:

Pluripotent Stem Cells

Description:

Pluripotent Stem Cells – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:354
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 64
Provided by: drgordo
Category:
Tags: cells | pluripotent | pood | stem

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pluripotent Stem Cells


1
Pluripotent Stem Cells
2
Objectives
  • What is a Stem Cell
  • Different Types of Stem Cells
  • Clinical Use of Stem Cells
  • Stem Cell Transplant
  • Types of Transplants
  • Mechanisms
  • Procedure
  • Potential Benefits and Toxicities
  • Clinical Results

3
Definition of a Stem Cell
  • primitive cell that can
  • 1) divide to reproduce itself (undergo self-
    renewal)
  • has extensive self-renewal ability
  • prerequisite for sustaining the population
  • 2) give rise to more specialized (differentiated)
    cells
  • has multilineage differentiation ability
  • Can differentiate into more than one cell type
  • Examples include hematopoietic stem cells (HSC)
    that give rise to all hematopoietic cells neural
    stem cells (NSC) that give rise to neurons,
    astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes
  • 3) can rescue a lethally damaged tissue in vivo
    for the lifetime of the recipient.

4

.
5
  • Early Experiments of Stem Cells and
    Hematopoiesis
  • 1) bone marrow stem cells can rescue lethally
    irradiated mice
  • ONLY SMALL NUMBER OF ACTUAL STEM CELLS REQUIRED
  • ENGRAFT IN NEW MARROW
  • DIFFERENTIATE INTO ALL CELLS LINES
  • CONTINUE TO UNDERGO SELF RENEWAL and
    DIFFERENTIATION IN NEW MARROW ENVIRONMENT

6
Stem cells
7
  • 2) primitive hematopoietic cells form colonies
    and sustain hematopoiesis in vitro culture
    mediums
  • Stem and progenitor cells can be sustained for
    prolonged periods of time in vitro in culture
    mediums
  • Progenitor cells are stimulated to differentiate
    by inclusion of growth regulatory proteins
    growth factors
  • Colony Forming Units
  • Bust Forming Units
  • With differentiation there is expression of new
    growth factor receptors
  • Growth factors also important in survival of stem
    cells
  • Stem Cell Factor, G-CSF, kit ligand,IL-1..

8
Stem cells
red cell colonies CFU-E
red cell bursts BFU-E
9
Stem cells
granulocyte colonies CFU-G
macrophage colonies CFU-M
10
Stem cells
mixed colonies CFU-GEMM
granulocyte/ macrophage colonies CFU-GM
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Stem cell hierarchy
14
Types of Stem Cells
15
Embryonic Stem Cells(ESC)
  • 4-8 cell stage of the human embryo
  • blastocyst
  • The Inner Cell Mass (ICM) are pluripotent stem
    cells
  • Can grow indefinitely in the primitive
    uncommitted state
  • Can differentiate and give rise to ALL tissues
    of the human body
  • ULTIMATE PLASTICITY
  • ETHICAL ISSUES

16
(No Transcript)
17
Embryonic Stem Cells (ES) in vitro
  • ES grown on feeder cell layers (mouse
    fibroblasts) leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF
    antidifferentiation cytokine)
  • Maintain their pristine, undifferentiated state
  • If removed-undergo spontaneous differentiation
    and initiate cell and tissue specification
  • Genes can be altered in ES cells
  • Ectopic transgene expression (designed gene
    deletion, substitution, mutation) used to
    manipulate genetic programs responsible for the
    development of neurons, cardiomyocytes,
    hepatocytes, blood

18
Somatic Adult Stem Cells (ASC)
  • Are tissue specific
  • Readily found in tissues that undergo rapid
    turnover blood, skin, central nervous system
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cells (HSC) most extensively
    used to characterize adult stem cells
  • Thought to be committed to their given cell
    lineage
  • Recent HSC studies suggest greater
    differentiation potential than previously thought
  • LESS PLASTICITY
  • HIGHLY AVAILABLE

19
Trans-differentiation of ASCs
  • Unlike ES, somatic stem cells thought to be
    restricted in differentiation capacity, and only
    able to generate cells of the derived tissue
  • Suggestion that ASCs in the right milieu are
    more plastic

20
Trans-differentiation of ASCs
  • HSCs injected into infarcted mouse myocardium
    improved cardiac function
  • Collect stem cells
  • Induced coronary artery infarct-gt measure EF of
    heart
  • Inject stem cells into infarct area(s)
  • Over time re-measure EF of heart sif improved
    EF

21
Cellular transplantation future therapeutic
options. Division of Cardiology, University of
Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada. PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cardiac
transplantation is a complex undertaking and an
imperfect solution to end-stage heart failure.
Cellular transplantation has been proposed as an
alternative solution however, clinical trials at
present are small and show variable results. The
mechanisms behind stem cell therapy have not yet
been elucidated. RECENT FINDINGS Several large
trials have been presented that address the
question of bone marrow stem cells as therapy for
acute myocardial infarction, and also the
possible benefits of therapy with granulocyte
colony-stimulating factor. Although some trials
show a modest improvement in ejection fraction or
reduction of infarct size, other trials show no
change with treatment. Fewer clinical data are
available on the treatment of chronic left
ventricular systolic function. Many questions
remain such as what cell type to use, dosing, the
ideal timing for therapy, and the technique of
cell delivery. Finally, further research
continues on the cellular milieu, enhancement of
cell engraftment, proliferation, and survival.
SUMMARY This review briefly examines the
background for stem cell therapy, as well as the
larger clinical trials of stem cell therapy for
acute myocardial infarction and chronic left
ventricular systolic dysfunction, and possible
pharmacologic enhancement options.
22
Intramyocardial implantation of CD133 stem cells
improved cardiac functionPoll Voekel et al
  • Cell transplantation for myocardial regeneration
    has been shown to have beneficial effects on
    cardiac function after myocardial infarction
  • Ten patients with end-stage chronic ischemic
    cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction lt22)
  • Autologous bone marrow CD133 cells (1.5-9.7 X
    106 cells) were injected
  • Stem cell transplantation typically improved the
    heart function stage from New York Heart
    Association/Canadian Cardiovascular Society class
    III-IV to I-II.
  • mean preoperative and postoperative ventricular
    ejection fractions were 15.8 /- 5 and 24.8 /-
    5, respectively

23
Cord Blood Stem Cells
  • Readily available
  • Thought to have higher plasticity than adult stem
    cells
  • No ethical issues
  • Yields small number of stem cells / harvest

24
ASC Stem Cell Transplant
  • Most experimental and clinical data are from
    Hematopoietic Stem Cells (HSC) used to treat
    hematopoietic diseases

25
Bone Marrow Harvest Transplant
26
Bone Marrow Harvest Transplant
27
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant
  • Stem cells harvested from peripheral blood rather
    than bone marrow
  • Less invasive
  • Quicker engraftment
  • High dose G-CSF stimulates bone marrow to release
    stem cells
  • Given subcutaneously
  • No severe adverse effects
  • Stem cells harvested from blood by peripheral line

28
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Harvest and Transplant
29
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Harvest
30
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant
31
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant
32
Stem Cell Transplant
  • Types
  • Mechanism How They Work

33
Types of Transplants
  • Autologous Transplant
  • Patients own stem cells
  • Allogeneic Transplant
  • Stem cells from someone elsedonor stem cells
  • Matched Sibling (Related) (MRD)
  • Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD)
  • Unmatched Related or Unrelated

34
Autologous Transplant
35
Allogeneic Transplant
  • Toxicity noted in early allogeneic studies
  • 2 disease of diarrhea, liver necrosis skin
  • Termed Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
  • GVHD pts had less leukemic relapse

36
Allogeneic Transplant
37
(No Transcript)
38
  • Allogeneic transplants results in
  • 1) fewer leukemic relapses GRAFT VERSUS
    LEUKEMIA EFFECT (GVL)
  • 2) increased toxicity GRAFT VERSUS HOST DISEASE
    (GVHD)

39
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Result in Donor
Immune Mediated Responses
  • Donor Immune cells recognize Recipient cells as
    non-self
  • Donor T-cells Attack
  • 1) Normal Host Cells Graft Vs Host Disease
    (GVHD)
  • 2) Neoplastic/Leukemic Host Cells Graft Vs
    Leukemia effect (GVL)
  • Results in
  • Greater cure rate
  • Higher Toxicity / Treatment Related Mortality
    (TRM)

40
MHC-HLA
  • MHC molecules discriminate self non-self
  • In humans HLA molecules
  • function is Ag presentation to T-cells
  • Via Antigen Presenting Cells (Dendritic Cells)
  • T-Cells trained early in thymus to recognize this
  • Required to select T-cells which are tolerant of
    self

41
  • Major HLA molecules (Class I II) most
    important
  • Class I (HLA-A, HLA-B) molecules interact with
    CD8 Cytotoxic T-cells
  • Expressed on all cells
  • Class II (HLA-DR) interact with CD4 Helper
    T-cells
  • Expressed on specific immune cells
  • Dendritic cells, B-cells
  • Minor HLA molecules

42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
HLA Balance most important for Allogeneic Stem
Cell Transplants
  • Major Class I II HLA matched for allogeneic
    SCT
  • Decreases severe GVHD
  • Minor HLA antigens not matched
  • Results in GVL effect
  • Less severe GVHD

45
Separating GVHD from GVL
  • Functional differences in T-cells subsets
  • IL-2 IFN ? ? Tc-1 Th-1 ? GVHD
  • IL-4, IL-5 IL-10 ? Tc-2 Th-2 ? GVL
  • Selection for Tc2 Th2 will preserve GVL
    prevent GVHD

46
  • Overall Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant
    (compared to Autologous SCT)
  • has greatest chance for CURE
  • Much higher TOXICITY and TREATMENT RELATED
    MORTALITY
  • 10 first 3 months

47
Active Lymphoma/Leukemia
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy
Remission
48
Stem Cell Harvest
  • Allogeneic Donor harvested shortly prior to
    transplant and infused into recipient
  • Autologous once in remission, patients own stem
    cells harvested/collected? frozen? short time
    later thawed and infused into patient

49
AUTOLOGOUS Stem Cell Transplant
Autologous Stem Cell Rescue
High Dose Chemo
Ablation
Engraftment
50
ALLOGENEIC Stem Cell Transplant
Donor Stem Cells
1) Engraftment
Donor T Cells
2) Donor T Cell Graft vs Tumor
(and GVHD)
51
Reducing the Toxicity of Allogeneic Transplants
  • Non-myeloablative or Mini-allogeneic
    transplants
  • Lower dose conditioning chemotherapy
  • Less toxic than full myeloablative traditional
    BMTs
  • Takes advantage of the graft vs tumor effect
  • Decreased mortality of transplant
  • Allogeneic transplants now possible for elderly
    medically compromised
  • Recent trials showing promising results

52
Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Transplants
Mini-Transplants
Low Dose Chemo
53
Increasing the Possibility of Matched Allogeneic
Transplants- the Unrelated Donor
  • 25 probability of 6/6 HLA-match of any given
    sibling
  • Many patients w/o matched related donor
  • International Bone Marrow registry
  • HLA Typing of individuals worlwide
  • Now 10 million registered
  • Probability of unrelated match close to 75
  • Ethnic background a factor

54
International BMT Registry
55
Clinical Results of Stem Cell Transplants
56
Autologous Stem Cell Transplants
  • Relapsed Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas and
    Hodgkins Lymphomas
  • Previous poor prognosis
  • 50 long term survival

57
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Median survival 2 ½ years with traditional chemo
  • Increases median survival to 5-6 years

58
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant
  • Adult AML (intermediate risk)
  • 2 year survival with high dose chemotherapy
  • Long term survival 60 with allo SCT

59
  • Refractory Low Grade Lymphomas
  • Previously no potential cure
  • Allogeneic transplant only treatment shown to
    result in long term survival
  • Mini-transplants 50 response rate / long term
    survival

60
  • Non Malignant Diseases
  • Severe Autoimmune disorders (SLE)
  • Severe Sickle Cell, Thalassemias
  • Marrow Failure (Aplastic Anemia)
  • Severe Immunodeficiency Disorders

61
Umbilical Cord Blood Transplants
  • Over 6000 UCB transplants worldwide
  • No ethical issues
  • Easy to get
  • Reduced transmission of infections
  • HLA mismatches much more tolerable
  • Most patients will find a 4/6 match worldwide
  • Major limitation limited cell dose
  • ¼ of the stem cells compared to adult harvest
  • Unrelated UCB 4/6 mismatch transplants similar
    success / toxicity to unrelated matched ASC
    transplants

62
Hematopoietic Transplants in 2007
  • Higher Success
  • Less Toxicities / Lower Transplant Mortality
  • Better viral and fungal prophylaxis
  • Better GVHD prophylaxis and control
  • Better conditioning regimens
  • More Patients Eligible for Transplant
  • Matched Unrelated Donor Registry
  • Mini- Transplants for elderly (gt60 yo) and
    medical comorbidities

63
The end
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com