Shriram Sarvotham Dror Baron Richard Baraniuk - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Shriram Sarvotham Dror Baron Richard Baraniuk

Description:

Polynomial decay of signal components. Recovery algorithms. reconstruction performance: ... polynomial complexity? near-linear or better? How to account for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: richar817
Learn more at: http://www-dsp.rice.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Shriram Sarvotham Dror Baron Richard Baraniuk


1
Shriram Sarvotham Dror BaronRichard Baraniuk
Measurements and Bits Compressed Sensing meets
Information Theory
ECE DepartmentRice University dsp.rice.edu/cs
2
CS encoding
  • Replace samples by more general encoder based on
    a few linear projections (inner products)
  • Matrix vector multiplication

sparsesignal
measurements
non-zeros
3
The CS revelation
  • Of the infinitely many solutions seek the
    onewith smallest L1 norm

4
The CS revelation
  • Of the infinitely many solutions seek the
    onewith smallest L1 norm
  • If then perfect reconstruction w/ high
    probability Candes et al. Donoho
  • Linear programming

5
Compressible signals
  • Polynomial decay of signal components
  • Recovery algorithms
  • reconstruction performance
  • also requires
  • polynomial complexity (BPDN) Candes et al.
  • Cannot reduce order of Kashin,Gluskin

constant
  • squared of best term approximation

6
Fundamental goal minimize
  • Compressed sensing aims to minimize resource
    consumption due to measurements
  • Donoho
  • Why go to so much effort to acquire all the
    data when most of what we get will be thrown
    away?

7
Measurement reduction for sparse signals
  • Ideal CS reconstruction of -sparse signal
  • Of the infinitely many solutions seek
    sparsest one
  • If M K then w/ high probability this cant be
    done
  • If M K1 then perfect reconstruction w/ high
    probability Bresler et al. Wakin et al.
  • But not robust and combinatorial complexity

number of nonzero entries
8
Why is this a complicated problem?
9
Rich design space
  • What performance metric to use?
  • Wainwright determine support set of nonzero
    entries
  • this is distortion metric
  • but why let tiny nonzero entries spoil the fun?
  • metric? ?
  • What complexity class of reconstruction
    algorithms?
  • any algorithms?
  • polynomial complexity?
  • near-linear or better?
  • How to account for imprecisions?
  • noise in measurements?
  • compressible signal model?

10
How many measurements do we need?
11
Measurement noise
  • Measurement process is analog
  • Analog systems add noise, non-linearities, etc.
  • Assume Gaussian noise for ease of analysis

12
Setup
  • Signal is iid
  • Additive white Gaussian noise
  • Noisy measurement process

13
Measurement and reconstruction quality
  • Measurement signal to noise ratio
  • Reconstruct using decoder mapping
  • Reconstruction distortion metric
  • Goal minimize CS measurement rate

14
Measurement channel
  • Model process as measurement channel
  • Capacity of measurement channel
  • Measurements are bits!

15
Main result
  • Theorem For a sparse signal with rate-distortion
    function , lower bound on measurement rate
    subject to measurement quality and
    reconstruction distortion satisfies
  • Direct relationship to rate-distortion content

16
Main result
  • Theorem For a sparse signal with rate-distortion
    function , lower bound on measurement rate
    subject to measurement quality and
    reconstruction distortion satisfies
  • Proof sketch
  • each measurement provides bits
  • information content of source bits
  • source-channel separation for continuous
    amplitude sources
  • minimal number of measurements
  • Obtain measurement rate via normalization by

17
Example
  • Spike process - spikes of uniform amplitude
  • Rate-distortion function
  • Lower bound
  • Numbers
  • signal of length 107
  • 103 spikes
  • SNR10 dB ?
  • SNR-20 dB ?

18
Upper bound (achievable) in progress
19
CS reconstruction meets channel coding
20
Why is reconstruction expensive?
  • Culprit dense, unstructured

sparsesignal
measurements
nonzeroentries
21
Fast CS reconstruction
sparsesignal
measurements
nonzeroentries
22
Ongoing work CS using BP Sarvotham et al.
  • Considering noisy CS signals
  • Application of Belief Propagation
  • BP over real number field
  • sparsity is modeled as prior in graph
  • Low complexity
  • Provable reconstruction with noisy measurements
    using
  • Success of LDPCBP in channel coding carried over
    to CS!

23
Summary
  • Determination of measurement rates in CS
  • measurements are bits each measurement
    provides bits
  • lower bound on measurement rate
  • direct relationship to rate-distortion content
  • Compressed sensing meets information theory
  • Additional research directions
  • promising results with LDPC measurement matrices
  • upper bound (achievable) on number of measurements

dsp.rice.edu/cs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com