Current Methods of Characterization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Current Methods of Characterization

Description:

Yeast Pheromone Signal Transduction Pathway. The pheromone response pathway ... Response to 1 M pheromone: simulated data, and model results for Gpa1/Ste4-Ste18 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:347
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: tytho
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Current Methods of Characterization


1
Rapid Characterization of Cellular Pathways Using
Time-Varying Signals Ty M. Thomson and
Drew Endy Division of Biological
Engineering, MIT Contacttmt_at_mit.edu
Input Microfluidics
Biological System Yeast Pheromone Signal
Transduction Pathway
A microfluidic device was designed, and
subsequently manufactured out of PDMS, to allow
for time varying stimuli to be applied to cells
anchored in a channel. On-chip valves allow for
rapid control of the flow rates of two fluids
through a single channel. By varying the flow
rates, the position of the boundary layer between
the fluids is altered, exposing cells anchored in
the channel to varying extracellular environments.
  • The pheromone response pathway is an obvious
    model system to use.
  • It is a well-studied prototype for regulatory
    networks that govern response to external stimuli
    in higher eukaryotes.
  • It contains many common elements of signaling
    pathways (MAPK cascade, G protein, etc.)
  • A number of stimuli and reporters are now
    available for this pathway, including specific
    inhibitors for several kinases.

0s
Current Methods of Characterization
0.1s
0.2s
Time Varying Stimulation - Parameter Sensitivity
Response to 1?M pheromone simulated data, and
model results for Gpa1/Ste4-Ste18 dissociation
rate 10x too high.
In general, the output of a given experiment or
simulation will depend critically on certain
parameters, and depend weakly on others. Fitting
parameters in our model to experimental data
gives us strong data for some parameters (on
which the results critically depend) and weak
data for others. We are using a computational
model of the pathway to identify stimulus
time-courses that have the greatest potential to
produce highly informative experimental results.
0.3s
Same as above plot, but data is linearly scaled
to match simulation (since data in arbitrary
units).
0.4s
Response to two 1?M pheromone pulses (at 0-10s
and 190-200s) simulated data (scaled), and model
results for Gpa1/Ste4-Ste18 dissociation rate 10x
too high.
For several stimulus time-courses, quantify mean
square error
Time-Varying Input/Output
Biological System
Output - Reporters
Input ?-fluidics
Output Signal (Experimental)
Acknowledgements
Conclusions
  • Kirsten Benjamin
  • Alejandro Colman-Lerner
  • Larry Lok
  • Jeremy Thorner
  • Todd Thorsen
  • Endy Lab
  • Molecular Sciences Institute
  • Alejandra Torres
  • Numerica Technology John Tolsma
  • Time Varying stimulus time courses show a
    definite improvement in parameter sensitivity
    over a step input, which should improve our
    estimation abilities for some parameters.
  • Time-varying stimulation of a pathway will likely
    not increase sensitivity enough for some other
    parameters to allow for accurate estimation
  • Controllable microfluidics is a practical method
    for controlling the fluid environment of
    immobilized yeast cells on sub-second timescales.
  • My technology platform will improve and scale
    along with advances in fluidics, reporter
    technology, and hypothesis testing and non-linear
    parameter estimation as they pertain to cellular
    systems.

Input Signal
Refine Model
References
Gpa1/Ste4-Ste18 dissociation rate
Pheromone/Ste2 dissociation rate
  • Microfluidic Soft Lithography Foundry -
    http//nanofab.caltech.edu/foundry
  • Ficarro, S. et al. (2002) Nat. Biotech. 20,
    301-305

Output Signal (Simulated)
Computational Model
Future Directions
Support
Signal Design
  • Use microfluidics to stimulate the system with an
    information-rich, time-dependent signal in order
    to observe more varied pathway behavior.
  • Measure the states of various reporters over
    time.
  • Evaluate hypotheses by comparing computational
    results with experimental results.
  • Test inferences and improve understanding by
    selecting a new input signal and repeating the
    process.
  • Further characterize cell behavior in the
    microfluidic chip environment.
  • Begin to perform pheromone response experiments
    with chip.
  • NHGRI Center of Excellence in Genomic Science
  • CSBi Cell Decision Process Center
  • MIT Presidential Fellowship
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com