Title: Wireless LAN - Introduction
1Wireless LAN - Introduction
2Lecture brief
- This lecture will touch briefly on the following
items - WLAN as a disruptive technology
- Advantages and disadvantages of WLAN
- 802.11 (WiFi) technology and main standards
- Some WLAN myth and reality
- Mobility definitions
- (Time permitting)
- Challenges in WLAN deployment and how to meet
them - The impact of WLAN on client, network and apps.
3WLAN as a disruptive technology
- Like previous disruptive technologies (IP, the
Internet) WLAN is changing the way people work
and live - WLAN is taking a strong hold in the home. People
are very happy with being Unwired and the
concept is pushed by industry looking for more
growth engines. - IT is pressured by users to deliver WLAN
- If IT does not deliver people tend to start
installing their own WLAN - The technology is problematic for the corporate
and many would like to avoid implementing it due
to various concerns - IT organizations are starting to see the real
benefits in WLAN as well in both cost savings and
(more importantly) productivity gains - As in the past the simpler technology wins over
better ones
4The advantages of WLAN
- Its sexy and hyped, People like new toys
- It saves carrying a dongle and/or patch cord ?
- (more seriously)
- Enhances user productivity
- No clear ROI. Most quote few more hours of work a
week - 11 minutes more a week will cover costs according
to study - Provides improved efficiency/productivity
- As a primary network the total cost is markedly
lower then the wired LAN - Need to be able to do Wireless Voice for that
- Allows flexible service provisioning
- With the right gear multiple networks can be
provided for different users in the same location
opaquely
5Disadvantages of WLAN
- Unless used as primary means of connectivity
presents a second infrastructure - Security signal leakage outside the buildings.
Physical perimeter security is gone - Performance/Reliability
- Back to shared media with relative low speed
- Operates in the non-licensed band and therefore
open to interference - Increases the number of managed entities by an
order of magnitude - At least in the Naïve implementation options
6The state of WLAN
- WLAN is starting to mature
- Both standard and (many) proprietary solutions
- Few of the new startups will likely survive
- Getting to become the main connectivity method
- Has to include voice over WLAN
- Requires SLA (uptime, performance) much closer to
wired - The drive for implementing primary WLAN is two
fold - Improved user productivity
- Lower TCO
- Lots of new architectures and options are popping
up
7802.11b Physical and MAC layers
- Two WLAN stations conversing on shared WLAN
infrastructure. WLAN is only concerned with the
physical and MAC layers
application
application
TCP
TCP
IP
IP
LLC
LLC
LLC
802.11 MAC
802.3 MAC
802.3 MAC
802.11 MAC
802.11 PHY
802.3 PHY
802.3 PHY
802.11 PHY
8Basic 802.11 terminology
- AP Access Point. A central controller that can
extend the range of the service set - stations in the BSS talk through a central
controller (AP) - The AP sets configurable parameters that all must
match - Those are carried in special packets called
beacons - BSS Basic service set
- Group of stations using a single media and
coordination function in a Basic Set Area (BSA) - All stations can communicate with each other
directly - If no central controller exist this is an iBSS
- Membership in a BSS is defined by the Service Set
Identifier (SSID) and the BSSID (Normally
controlled by the AP) - Multiple APs per SSID. Potentially multiple SSID
per AP
9Basic 802.11 terminology
- Different APs connect through a distribution
system (DS). Normally a wired backbone - All the APs connected on the DS and their BSS
form the ESS - Extended service set - The ESS is a single L2 environment /broadcast
domain - Stations send packets other stations in the same
ESS directly - Stations can freely move within the ESS
10An EBSS environment
DS
11Hidden node problem
- not everyone hears everyone
- Distance
- Physical barriers (walls etc)
- A traffic to B can collide with C traffic to B
without A or C being in the know
C
B
A
12Radio standards
- Wireless LAN (WiFi) is a layer 1-2 technology
based on Ethernet - Uses CSMA (Collision sense multiple access) but
unlike Ethernet attempts Collision Avoidance (CA)
rather than detection (CD) so considered CSMA/CA - Tailored for the noisy radio band
- Supports client to client Ad-Hoc networking and
base station (AP) based connectivity called
infrastructure mode - Operates in two main bands
- The ISM 2.4 Ghz band (about 80 Mhz, 3 non
overlapping channels). Each channel uses some
20mhz. - The 5 Ghz licensed band. Channels are also 20Mhz
- Can use RTS/CTS mechanism to deal with access
rights and solve the hidden node problem. - Incurs a lot of overhead due to collision
avoidance scheme and error correction in the
noisy medium
13The 802.11 main working groups
- 802.11 is the IEEE committee working on the WLAN
standards - IEEE deals with the lower levels protocols only
- Focuses on short range, high throughput,
relatively low power - PAN focuses on high throughput in lower power
- MAN/WAN such as WiMAX will focus on range with
higher power involved - It includes a lot of working groups. Main ones
are - Radio standards (802.11, 802.11b, 802.11a,
802.11g, 802.11n) - Other supporting functions (partial list)
- 802.11e - MAC Enhancements for QoS (Expected Sep
05) - 802.11f - Inter Access Point Protocol
- 802.11i - MAC Enhancements for Enhanced Security
- 802.11R Fast roaming
14Radio standards in the 802.11
- 802.11 The old FH/DSSS WLAN standard _at_1-2mbps
in the 2.4 GHz range, 3 channels - 802.11b improved modulation (CCK) _at_up to 11mbps
at the 2.4 GHz range, 3 channels - 802.11g The newest 2.4GHz modulation using OFDM
and able to provide 54Mbps, 3 channels - 802.11a OFDM modulation in the 5GHz licensed
band, not available everywhere. OFDM, up to 54
Mbps and 8-12 usable channels. Uses 802.11h for
transmit power control and channel selection - 802.11n OFDM modulation using multiple antenna
(MIMO) provides gt100mbps, not rectified
15Different Standards for Different Needs
Business
802.11a
- High performance and scalability
Auditorium
802.11b
- Mature, globally deployed standard
- Good wall penetration and range
Hotspots
802.11g
- Faster speeds than 802.11b, backward
compatible to 802.11b - Good wall penetration and range
- Early standard and solutions
Campus
SOHO
802.11a/b
- High performance, scalability and
interoperability
Home
802.11a/b/g
- Best overall solution for freedom,
flexibility and interoperability
16802.11a
802.11b
802.11g
2.4 GHz 3 non-overlapping channels
Feature 11a 11b 11g
Higher throughput þ þ
Higher network capacity þ
Better wall penetration þ þ
Low wireless interference þ
Existing Infrastructure þ
5 GHz 8 non-overlapping channels
Exact number of 11a channels depends on
individual country restrictions.
17WLAN myth - performance
- WLAN BW quoted is client association speed
- This is the biggest myth in WLAN because in
actuality the performance that one can get from
the network is way lower than the one quoted - 802.11b supports 11mbps but stops at 6 mbps even
for optimal size packets - 802.11g and 802.11a are supposed to support 54
mbps but in reality support about 22mbps/15 mbps
respectively with optimal packet sizes - With small packets this drops significantly
18Performance 802.11b/a
19Real life throughput of 802.11b/g/a
20Throughput dependency on packet sizes
21WLAN myth BW requirements
- Users do not consume as much BW as expected
- Move from switched 100 mbps to shared 10 looks
horrible - But users are pretty happy with their home ADSL
_at_750kbps down/96kbps up - How much does a user really need?
- Today the LAN is non blocking and free
- Bottleneck is usually servers
- Clients cannot really use 100mbps normally
- Changes with the move to WLAN
- Need solutions
22WLAN Mobility - basics
- Mobility includes two different usage models
often mixed - Nomadic user able to take laptop/PDA from one
place to another and work there (but not continue
sessions) - Roaming user ability to (seamlessly) continue
working while moving. Harder by far - Achieving nomadic status is mainly about having
coverage - But each time all sessions need to be
re-established
23WLAN Mobility - roaming
- Layer 2 roaming happens when a client changes AP
- Challenge hand over user fast enough to not
drop packets or eve degrade voice quality. - Main problem 802.1X re-authentication
- Solution fast secure roaming (802.11r in work)
- Layer 3 roaming happens when a client moves to a
new EBSS - There is a limit to how far a single BSS can be
stretched - Challenge keep sessions open. IP change will
tear down sessions - Solution allow client to keep their IP between
BSS. Usually with mobile IP or L2 overlay network - Same or worse timing problem
24Seamless mobility
- The newest hype is about Seamless mobility
- The ability to switch between transports
- WiFi
- WiMax
- Cellular/3G
- LAN?
- While not loosing the sessions
- Requires solutions in the network layer
(mobileIP) or the application layer
25Main challenges in WLAN implementation
- Security, security, security (your standard FUD)
- Wireless is easily tapped. WEP can be broken
- Rogue APs
- Capacity/Performance
- LAN is switched 100 mbps. shared 11mbps seems
problematic - No real way to stop malicious or innocent
interference - Requires applications to consider limited BW
- Mobility Roam without impacting quality too
much - Cost
- Creating additional infrastructure for the
Wireless - TCO for the infrastructure and clients
- Management
- Number of managed entities grows significantly
- Users are on the move and difficult to track
26WLAN security concerns
- Using no security allows everyone in range to tap
in to your network - Simple security solutions (mac filtering ,hidden
SSID etc) do not work - Everyone knows that WEP can be broken (but
apparently not how hard it really is) - Most people still do not use encryption
- Even businesses are often found unprotected
- Rogue APs are a real security threat
- Allow anyone access to your LAN from outside
- Not implementing your own WLAN increases risk
27WLAN Security - solutions
- WLAN security flaws have been the focus of (too)
many articles and discussions - The hard fact is that the currently available
solutions are quite good (and will be discussed
extensively later in the course) - WEP is broken but it takes much more than what is
commonly perceived to break it - Existing WPA has never been shown to be broken
- The full 802.11i with AES encryption is even
stronger - L2 and L3 VPN technologies can easily secure the
WLAN - The single worst security threat is rogue APs and
those are just worse if no WLAN is supplied - We will review the security solutions in depth in
a future lecture
28Capacity concerns and solutions
- WLAN capacity is much lower than the switched
100mbps - Also the limited number of channels is a big
consideration - It is better than the old shared 10mbps unless
packets are extremely small since CA works better
than CD with high utilization - How much do users actually need?
- Most users are happy enough on ADSL with 750K
max. - 300 Kbps/user for secondary service
- For Primary use is 1 mbps the magic number ?
- High impact of VOIP and other real time protocols
or ones that use small packets - Move to higher throughput with 802.11a/g and
802.11n later on - Tailor applications to recognize network
conditions - In the future smart antenna solutions will really
help
29Reliability concerns
- WLAN is wide open to interference
- Unless you use a Faraday cage you are open to
interference - Even a normal cordless phone can bring down a
WLAN channel - A microwave can pretty much block the whole range
- Any cable tester for 2.4 with directional antenna
will do - The common protocols of 802.11b and 802.11g use
the unlicensed 2.4GHz band - Very hard to persecute offenders
- The security required adds more points of failure
- 802.11e not rectified yet (QOS)
30Dealing with reliability
- Engineer the network for no single point of
failure - Redundant coverage for AP and L2 switches
- Dual L3 devices
- Multiple authentication servers or VPN gateways
- Implement interference detection/avoidance
- Use equipment that knows to automatically switch
away from channels blocked by interference - Implement location services to find interference
sources - Move to 802.11a
- Less interference than the ISM band
- 8-12 channels makes it difficult to block the
service - The wider the band the more difficult
it is to block - 802.11h allows channel agility and power control
31WLAN management concerns
- With WLAN the number of network elements is
vastly larger than normal LAN - Part due to area coverage and part to the low
throughout of each AP - Managing such a large number of devices is very
problematic - How do you set them all up
- How do you change configuration when needed
dynamically - Updating software and firmware on all the APs is
a big problem
32WLAN management solutions
- Smart management servers (available from a few
vendors) that can centrally manage large number
of APs - Removing as much of the managed entities from the
AP to a central location - Different AP types Smart, thin, hybrid
- Each of the last two moves some of the MAC layer
to a central controller - More on this in later lectures
33Cost concerns
- WLAN infrastructure has many more entities to
manage/control/upgrade which contributes to high
TCO - Clients need to be brought to new standards to
gain benefit of better security and radio
protocols - Every new technology is harder to support and
means training the support personnel. It may also
be less stable more calls
34Cost benefits
- APs are very cheap compared to LAN switches so
the cost of the infrastructure goes way down - No more Add/Move/Change cost for clients
- Our observation is that WLAN reduces the number
of support calls rather then increase them - Move to primary use allows real cost benefit
35WLAN Impact on infrastructure
- The one network serves all paradigm is broken
- We got used to the LAN delivering any requirent
for 95 of users - This is no longer the case
- Different users have different BW requirements
and with WLAN that has to be taken into account - VOIP introduces different requirements and so
does Video. VOIP traffic clogs the network very
easily - standard WLAN does not support multiple
networks - Multiple AP on same location is expensive and
causes co-habitation problems - WLAN has no real QoS today
36WLAN impact on user
- Users can become mobile
- Nomadic or Roaming user
- Users can use the network in places not available
before - More usable work time
- Different use models, especially with roaming
- User productivity is much enhanced
37WLAN impact on applications
- Applications writers used to consider the network
a non issue - Which often proved very wrong on the WLAN but
right for the LAN - With WLAN and mobility that is not true
- Users may lose the network temporarily and/or
their BW may be limited/fluctuating - Applications need to be written to address
- Good example outlook 2003
- Bad example net meeting