COMPARISON OF RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TESTS FOR INFLUENZA WITH VIRUS ISOLATION AND IMMUNOPEROXIDASE ASSAY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

COMPARISON OF RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TESTS FOR INFLUENZA WITH VIRUS ISOLATION AND IMMUNOPEROXIDASE ASSAY

Description:

COMPARISON OF RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TESTS FOR INFLUENZA WITH VIRUS ISOLATION AND IMMUNOPEROXIDASE ASSAY – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:174
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: mudrmartin
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: COMPARISON OF RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TESTS FOR INFLUENZA WITH VIRUS ISOLATION AND IMMUNOPEROXIDASE ASSAY


1
  • COMPARISON OF RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TESTS FOR
    INFLUENZA WITH VIRUS ISOLATION AND
    IMMUNOPEROXIDASE ASSAY
  • Martina Havlícková
  • Helena Jirincová
  • National Influenza Centre Prague

2
Rapid laboratory diagnosis of influenza by means
of near patients test
  • Antigen detection
  • rapid (15-30 minutes)
  • widely available
  • early picture of influenza outbreak
    (virus
  • circulation)
  • but variable sensitivity and specificity

3
Commercially available kits for detection of
influenza A/B I
4
Commercially available kits for detection of
influenza A/B II
5
Owerview of used tests
  • Izolation in cell culture MDCK
  • IPA after 48-72 hours of cultivation on MDCK
  • Rapid tests
  • QuickVue Influenza AB test
  • BinaxNow Influenza A/B
  • DirectigenTM Flu AB
  • Infl A- Respistrip - just standards A

6
Owerview of investigated samples
  • ? 100 nasopharyngeal swabs
  • Negative AB 53
  • Positive A 30
  • Positive B 17
  • Standards TCID 50

7
Comparison of Directigen, QuickVue, NowFlu and
immunoperoxidase assay results SENSITIVITY
  • Test influenza A
    influenza B total



  • positive
  • (30
    posit.samples) (17 posit. samples)
  • -------------------------------------------------
    ------------------------
  • IP assay 27/28 (96)
    16/17 (94) 43/45(95)
  • Virus isol. 12/30 (40)
    10/17 (59) 22/47(47)
  • Directigen A/B 26/30 (87)
    6/17 (35) 32/47(68)
  • QuickVue A/B 29/30 (97)
    11/17(65) 40/47(85)
  • NowFLU A/B 22/30 (73)
    2/10 (20) 24/40(60)
  • home made ELISA 20/30 (67)
    2/17 (12) 22/47(47)
  • (first screening)

8
Comparison of Directigen, QuickVue, NowFlu and
immunoperoxidase assay results SPECIFICITY
  • Test 53 influenza A
    and B negative samples




  • influenza A influenza B
  • -------------------------------------------------
    ------------------------
  • IP assay 0/53
    (100) 0/53 (100)
  • Virus isol. 0/53
    (100) 0/53 (100)
  • Directigen A/B 3/53 (94)
    0/53 (100)
  • QuickVue A/B 1/53 (98)
    0/53 (100)
  • NowFLU A/B NT
    NT
  • home made ELISA 0/53
    (100) 0/53 (100)
  • (first screening)

9
Efficacy of IP assay, direct antigen detection
and virus isolation from 3th to 13th week 05
  • total swabs IP assay antigen
    virus

  • detection isolation
  • --------------------------------------------------
    -------------------
  • 442 150(34) ? 73(16)
    ? 61(13)

10
A/California 7/04H3N2
11
B/CR/115/05
12
IPA on MDCK cells infected by A/H1N1 after 48
hours of incubtion
13
Evaluation of Quick A/B test
  • Valid test A
  • Valid test B
  • Valid test A/B-
  • Invalid tests

14
Evaluation of BinaxNow Influenza A/B Test
15
Evaluation of Directigen Influenza A/B test
16
Conclusion
  • Simple and rapid influenza tests
  • an important contribution to patient
    management?
  • appropriate use of antibiotics
    and diagnostic procedure
  • useful tool for virological
    surveillance
  • results are closely dependend on type
    and quality of
  • specimens
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com