Ranjana Mukherjee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Ranjana Mukherjee

Description:

Omer Gokcekus. PREM Learning Week, 20 July 2002. Ranjana Mukherjee. Gender and Corruption ... 2 studies show the larger the proportion of women in work force, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: WB1673
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ranjana Mukherjee


1
Gender and Corruptionin the Public Sector
  • Perceptions of Public Officials from Six
    Developing and Transition Countries

2
Question
  • Is the proportion of women employed in public
    organizations connected with their level of
    corruption?

3
On corruption and gender
  • 2 studies showthe larger the proportion of
    women in work force, the greater the
    representation of women in parliament, in
    ministerial / high level government positions,
    the lower is the level of corruption

4
Survey Question about corruption 1. Severity,
and2. Chances of being reported
  • Some consider that one of the main problems
    affecting the performance of the Government and
    its structures is corruption. How important is
    this problem in your organization?
  • Very important
  • Relatively important
  • Of little importance
  • Not important at all
  • In general, how often are cases of corruption
    reported to proper authorities?
  • Always
  • Frequently
  • Sometimes
  • Never

5
Responses of 3,927 officials from 90
organizations
 
6
Findings across countries
7
Findings across countries
8
Public officials perceptions of corruption
versus TI-2001 Corruption Perception Indices
9
Findings within countrydoes an organizations
corruption depend upon the proportion of women
employees?
10
Findings Pooled OrganizationsCONTROLLING
COUNTRY AND ORGANIZATION SPECIFIC -EFFECTS
  • Regression result
  • Level of Corruption
  • Constant
  • - 0.80 TRANSITION
  • 1.73 Policy Implementing
  • - 9.19 FEMALE
  • 11.68 FEMALE2

11
Measuring all surveyed organizations corruption
indices on the same scale
  • Officials descriptive responses were converted
    to a numerical scale of 0 to 10,where 0 good
    i.e. no corruption and 10 bad, i.e. highly
    corrupt
  • FORMULA 1 (for 4 responses)
  • CORRUPTION INDEX organization-i 40/3 10/3
    (Average response organization-i )
  • FORMULA 2 (for 3 responses)
  • CORRUPTION INDEX organization-i 15 5 (Average
    response organization-i )

12
Findings pooled organizations
13
Findings pooled organizations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com