Aperture Studies for the Phase 1 Upgrade - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Aperture Studies for the Phase 1 Upgrade

Description:

A corresponding rectellipse is derived from the octagon. Implemented in MADX. 11/6/09 ... Octagon. 11/6/09. Phase 1 Upgrade Team BE/ABP. 16. TANC (IR5) 11/6/09 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: JMI81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aperture Studies for the Phase 1 Upgrade


1
Aperture Studies for the Phase 1 Upgrade
  • a) Comparison of Octagonal and Rectellipse
    screens in MQX
  • b) TANC (IR5), TANAL/R (IR1)

2
  • Octagonal Rectellipse Beam Screens

3
  • The octagonal beam screen dimensions are derived
    using an accredited recipe (EDMS 350449,
    N. Kos).
  • Wall thickness (ss) is 1.5mm (S.F J.M).
  • The shielding in Q1 is 9mm thick.
  • A corresponding rectellipse is derived from the
    octagon.
  • Implemented in MADX

4
Collision Optics at 7TeV (30cm)
5
Nominal Half-Crossing 0.5mm, 205 µrad
6
Tilted Crossing _at_ -75o
7
Simple Strategy IR5
  • For each screen, tilt the separation bumps at
    angles of -90o to 90o in steps of 15o and
    extract the minimum n1 in each of the insertion
    triplets
  • beam 1 and beam2
  • ignore spurious dispersion
  • IR5 nominally H crossing (f 0o ).
  • Verify results using Bernard Jeannerets program.

8

9

10
  • Example Halo Plot (rectellipse screen, IR5)

11
Exhaustive Strategy IR1 IR5
  • For each screen, tilt the separation bumps in
    both IR1 and IR5 at angles of -90o to 90o in
    steps of 15o and extract the minimum n1 in each
    of the insertion triplets of IR5 for beams 1 and
    2, including the effect of spurious dispersion
  • IR1 nominally V crossing (f 90o)
  • Grid of 13 x 13 169 points for each screen
  • Plot worst case configurations and compare

12

13

14

15

Rectellipse
Octagon
16
  • TANC (IR5)

17
TANC
  • Circular aperture, 52mm ID
  • Geometry optimised for current LHC layout,
    especially w.r.t D1 D2
  • Strategy is exhaustive, as above
  • Screen in MQX not relevant
  • Set parallel separation bump polarity to -1, 0,
    1
  • Grid of 13 x 13 169 points for each polarity
  • Plot worst case configurations and compare

18

7.5s
5.5s

19

20
Conclusion
  • Optimised octagonal beam screen gives greater
    flexibility to the separation scheme for
    negligible loss of aperture compared to the
    rectellipse.
  • Operational aperture margin will be gained by
    correction spurious dispersion.
  • Preliminary results suggest changing the TAN

21
T.B.D
  • Complete the study for the TANC, TANAL/R (all
    polarities separations).
  • Declare final conclusions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com