Title: Criterionrelated psychological assessment in executive and workplace coaching
1Criterion-related psychological assessment in
executive and workplace coaching
- Dr Elizabeth Allworth
- Allworth Juniper Organisational Psychologists
-
- Dr Barbara Griffin
- The University of Sydney
2Overview
- Criterion-related validity
- Models of job performance
- Performance in the context of change
- Predictors of performance in the changing job
context
3Reflecting on the context
- Imagine your client is a major pharmaceutical
company, The Good Health Company - CEO asks you to assess the capabilities of the
companys executive team in preparation for a
development program - Why? What underlies this interest?
- Where would you start? What would you assess?
- What outcomes might you expect? Why would the
company buy your assessment proposal?
4Criterion-related psychological assessment
- Assessment must be linked to some criterion or
outcome - First, decide what the assessment should predict.
- Then, look for the best measure.
5Criteria
- Organisational outcomes
- Effectiveness (growth, profits etc)
- Tenure talent retention
- Productivity (sales results, production figures
etc.) - Satisfactory performance
- Job performance (ratings from managers
multi-rater feedback) - Successful training outcomes
- Career advancement
- Job satisfaction
6Implications for coaches
- Start from the perspective of the organisation
and the individuals job requirements - Understand the relationships between predictors
(e.g. measures of cognitive ability, personality
etc) and job performance - Select assessments that are predictive of the
criteria of interest
7The performance domain
- Imagine you are now coaching the Sales Director
in The Good Health Company. - What do you think this persons job requires of
them? - What knowledge, skills, abilities and other
attributes (KSAOs) would the Sales Director need
for the role?
8The performance domain
- Traditionally, job performance thought to be a
unitary or global entity - More recently, theorists have tried to
differentiate between different aspects of the
performance domain - Today, performance domain considered to be
multi-dimensional and dynamic
9Campbell (1990)
- Job-specific task proficiency
- Non job-specific task proficiency
- Written oral communication
- Demonstrating effort
- Personal discipline
- Facilitation of peer and team performance
- Supervision/leadership
- Management/administration
10Borman Motowidlo (1993)
- Task performance
- Core technical activities
- Usually explicit in a job description
- Contextual performance
- Helpful cooperative constructive behaviours
that management values - Organisational citizenship
- Seldom included in job descriptions
11Benefits of Borman Motowidlos model for
coaching
- Easily understood by coachees
- A framework for developmental needs
- Applicable across all jobs
- Contextual skills likely to be more transferable
across jobs - Contextual skills potentially more malleable
12Performance in the context of change
- Imagine now, The Good Health Company is about to
be acquired by the multinational, SuperHealth. - The Sales Directors role will change.
- What KSAOs are likely to be important in this
context of change?
13Adaptive performance
- Allworth Hesketh (1999) expanded Borman
Motowidlos (1993) model to include Adaptive
Performance - Accounts for changing nature of work
- Refers to skills and behaviours relevant to a
changing job context e.g. cognitive ability,
self-efficacy for change, change coping skills
etc.
14Pulakos et al. (2000)
- Adaptive performance consists of
- Solving novel and complex problems
- New learning
- Interpersonal adaptation
- Cross-cultural adaptation
- Handling crises
- Coping with stress
- Handling ambiguity and uncertainty
- Physically oriented adaptability
15Adaptive performance re-analysed
- Griffin and Hesketh (2003) divided adaptive
performance into three categories of behaviour - Reactive behaviour - changing or modifying
oneself to better suit the new environment - Proactive behaviour - initiating actions to
change the environment - Tolerant behaviour - continuing to function
despite changed circumstances.
16Coaching and adaptive performance
- Important for career success in the current
climate - Enables coachees to understand the types of
change and new demands likely to be imposed in
the future - A guide to the process of coping with change and
the types of behaviours necessary
17Criterion-related validity
- The extent to which performance on a
psychological test or measure predicts
performance on the job - e.g. High scorers should perform better on the
job than lower scorers
18Criterion-related validity
- First, determine the criteria using a model of
job performance or results of a job analysis. - Choose the tests that best predict the criteria
of interest e.g. - ability/aptitude cognitive ability tests
- personality
- interests
- values etc
19Predictors of overall performance
- Cognitive ability
- Personality
- Conscientiousness
- Other Big Five factors
20Cognitive ability
- Generalisable validity across jobs
- Measures of general cognitive ability usually
refer to numerical, verbal and abstract reasoning - Measures of learning and problem-solving ability
21Cognitive ability job complexity
- General cognitive ability a better predictor of
performance in higher level jobs - Speed and accuracy measures better predictors in
lower level jobs
22Cognitive ability and stage of learning
- Cognitive ability important in early stages of a
job - Speed and accuracy important in later
stages....if tasks can be done automatically
23Personality - The Big Five
- Conscientiousness
- Neuroticism (Emotional Stability)
- Agreeableness
- Extroversion
- Openness to Experience
24Personality - The Big Five
- Conscientiousness Emotional Stability
predictive across most jobs - Extroversion Agreeableness predicts management
and sales performance - Openness to Experience predicts training outcomes
- (Barrick Mount, 1991 Tett, Jackson,
Rothstein, 1991)
25The Big Five and other criteria
- Conscientiousness predicts job satisfaction
- Emotional Stability predicts income and
occupational status - (Judge, Higgins, Thoresen Barrick, 1999)
- Conscientiousness and Extroversion related to job
status (employed versus unemployed) one year
after graduation. - (De Fruyt and Mervielde,1999)
26Personality Leadership (Judge, Bono, Ilies
Gerhardt, 2002)
- Relatively strong relationship between leadership
and Big Five - Extroversion the strongest
- Conscientiousness next most important
- Openness to Experience and Emotional Stability
also important - Differential validity leadership emergence
(being perceived as a leader) and leadership
effectiveness (being successful as a leader)
27Leadership and the Big Five (Judge et al., 2002)
28Predictors of task and contextual performance
29Predictors of adaptive performance
- Cognitive ability
- Behaviour
- Motivation
- Personality
30Cognitive ability
- Cognitive ability is a good predictor of adaptive
performance. Why? - Cognitive ability predicts performance best when
tasks are complex or novel - (Murphy, 1989)
- New learning as job requirements change
- Need to transfer learning from one situation to
another
31Behaviour
- Problem-focused coping strategies (Lazarus
Folkman, 1984 Allworth and Hesketh, 1999) - Related constructs e.g. resilience, emotional
control, and anxiety, may also be relevant to
coaching
32Motivation
- Self-efficacy for change (Allworth Hesketh,
1999) - Role breadth self-efficacy (Parker, 1998).
- Develops from successful and varied experiences
in organisations, support and reinforcement for
taking on new roles. - Individuals with high role breadth self-efficacy
seem more willing and confident to undertake a
wide range of roles.
33Personality
- Proactive personality (Crant, 1995)
- Relationship between career success (career
promotions, salary improvements and career
satisfaction) and proactivity in bringing about
change in ones life and career. (Seibert, Crant
and Kraimer, 1999)
34Personality
- Openness to experience consistently related to
technical proficiency and the acquisition of job
knowledge (Hough, 1992). - Individuals who are more open to experience and
less orderly and deliberate in their approach to
tasks cope better (LePine, Colquitt and Erez,
2000)
35Conclusion
- Psychological assessment needs to reflect the
requirements of jobs - Models of performance help to define job
requirements - The context of change provides an additional
dimension for assessment