Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models

Description:

AFES folks: W. Ohfuchi et al. And particularly to: Li Yuan (now at Chase-Manhattan Bank) John Koshyk (now at Toronto-Dominion bank) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: geotes
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric Models


1
Gws in Ultra-fine Resolution Global Atmospheric
Models
Thanks to GFDL-SKYHI model folks
J. Mahlman, J. Wilson, R. Hemler, L.
Umscheid.. AFES folks W. Ohfuchi et al. And
particularly to Li Yuan (now at Chase-Manhattan
Bank) John Koshyk (now at Toronto-Dominion
bank) Yoshiyuki Takahashi (Hokkaido U.)
2
"Ultra-fine" AGCM
  • GFDL SKYHI N270-L40 (T450)
  • AFES T1279-L96 T639-L48, T639-L24
  • NASA fvGCM N720-L48
  • NICAM 3.5 km Icosahedral-L54

3
"Ultra-fine" AGCM
  • GFDL SKYHI N270-L40 (T450)
  • AFES T1279-L96 T639-L48, T639-L24
  • NASA fvGCM N720-L48
  • NICAM 3.5 km Icosahedral-L54

4
(No Transcript)
5
SKYHI Model
  • Global, hydrostatic primitive equations
  • A-grid-point model, explicit time-marching
  • Model domain surface-about 80 km
  • Ri-dependent vertical mixing
  • Smagorinsky-type harmonic horizontal mixing
  • Moist convective adjustment

6
(No Transcript)
7
possible caveats
  • A-grid - poor representation of dispersion
    relation for short waves, no enstrophy
    conservation - accumulation of energy ...?
  • Interpolation needed for spherical harmonic
    expansions
  • Moist convective adjustment
  • Smagorinsky diffusion

8
AFES Model
  • Global, hydrostatic primitive equations
  • Spectral model, semi-implicit time differencing
  • Model domain surface to about 55 km
  • Linear biharmonic diffusion
  • Emanuel convection, Modified AS ... others

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Dry-dynamical-core Model
  • No latent heat
  • No thermal interaction with surface
  • No topography
  • Thermal forcing only through a Newtonian cooling
    towards a specified radiative equilibrium which
    is a function of pressure and latitude (following
    Held Suarez, 1994)

18
(No Transcript)
19
(Nontopographic) Gravity Wave Forcing
  • Can we characterize gravity wave fluxes into the
    stratosphere in terms of tropospheric
    circulations?
  • e.g. how much spatial and temporal variability
    is in the flux (e.g. "90 of flux from 1 of the
    globe?")

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
  • Topographic drag - comparing detailed simulation
    with parameterization
  • Review Garner 2005 JAS
  • Earlier simulations e.g. Olaffson
    and
    Bougeault 1996, 1997
  • Relation of near tropopause gravity wave fluxes
    to underlying dry dynamics (Dunkerton and
    Sullivan, 1992 Zhang 2004)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com