Nino Maddalena - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Nino Maddalena

Description:

Why should we be concerned about drug related crime? The evidence ... on a sample of opiate and crack users who had recently offended but had not been ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: pbr50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nino Maddalena


1
Nino Maddalena Criminal Justice
Manager National Treatment Agency
2
Overview
  • The problem
  • Why should we be concerned about drug
    related crime?
  • The evidence
  • How do we know that drug treatment can make
    a difference?
  • Whats been achieved?
  • 11 years on from the first 10 year strategy
  • Where do we go from here?
  • What threats and opportunities does the
    future hold?

3
Why its everybodys problem?
  • If you are a taxpayer you will pick up part of
    the annual 15.4bn bill for the crime and health
    costs generated by people buying and using Class
    A drugs such as heroin and crack
  • If you are a victim of crime there is a strong
    chance it will be drug-related. Estimates suggest
    that between a third and a half of all
    acquisitive crime (shoplifting, burglary, vehicle
    crime, robbery, etc) is drug-related. Around
    three-quarters of heroin and crack users say they
    commit crime to fund their habit
  • The community you live in can be badly affected
    in a number of ways, from the antisocial
    behaviour associated with drug dealing, the
    activities of those under the influence of drugs
    (including discarded needles), the violence
    associated with organised crime, and
    prostitution.

4
Treatment effectiveness
  • The National Treatment Outcome Research Study
    (NTORS) followed more than 1,000 problem drug
    users through treatment It recorded significant
    reductions in offending, with rates of
    acquisitive crime falling by half at the one-year
    point. These improvements were maintained at
    various follow-up points.
  • National Institute for Health and Clinical
    Excellence (NICE) suggests the health and crime
    cost of each injecting drug user is 480,000 over
    a lifetime.
  • For every 1 spent on drug treatment 9.50 was
    saved on economic, health and social costs
    associated with drug misuse

5
Evidence of effectiveness of CJ interventions
  • Arrest Referral Schemes 1 and the Drug Treatment
    and Testing Orders (DTTO)2 which showed that the
    average amount pent on drugs fell from 400 per
    week at the start of the intervention to 25 per
    week at the follow up stage
  • More than1 in 4 of those starting a new episode
    of treatment in England are referred by staff
    working in the criminal justice system.
  • 1 http//www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/law/research/icpr/pu
    blications/Doing20Justice20to20Treatment.20DPA
    S2.pdf
  • 2 http//www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/hors212.pd
    f

6
Stop press
  • http//www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs06/r275.pdf
  • This study matches data from the Police National
    Computer (PNC) with the NTAs National Drug
    Treatment Monitoring System (NDTMS) database on a
    sample of opiate and crack users who had recently
    offended but had not been jailed and had started
    treatment in the community. The number of
    offences committed almost halved following the
    start of treatment and the results were very much
    in line with the studies that had been based on
    self report information

7
(No Transcript)
8
Where we came from?
  • 2001 Arrest Referral
  • (monthly)
  • 2000 assessments England and Wales
  • 460 (25) engage in treatment
  • Drug Treatment and
  • Testing Order (DTTO)
  • 2001/02 - 4,854 commencements
  • Limited target group
  • Proscriptive and inflexible 20 hours
  • Accredited programme required

9
Whats been achieved in the community?
  • Drug Interventions Programme (DIP)
  • Criminal Justice Integrated Teams (CJITs)
  • Testing on arrest
  • Required assessments
  • Restrictions on bail
  • Rapid access to treatment
  • Drug Rehabilitation Requirements (DRRs)
  • Every week, over 1,000 drug-misusing offenders
    are engaged in treatment via DIP
  • HO research followed group of 7,727 DIP clients
    and found that half showed a 79 reduction in
    offending over a 6 month period
  • Overall volume of offending was 26 lower
    following DIP identification
  • Number of DRRs increased from 4,854 in 2001/02 to
    16,607 in 2007/08 in 2007/08. Completion rates
    28 in 2003 43 in 2007/08

10
(No Transcript)
11
A work in progress more to be done
  • Implementing the DIP review
  • Continuity of care
  • System Change Pilots more joined up, more
    efficient, more effective
  • Integrated Offender Management addressing the
    reintegration agenda and delivering case
    management

12

http//www.nta.nhs.uk/publications/documents/nta_c
riminaljustice_0809.pdf
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com