SheffieldSheffield Lake City School District - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 137
About This Presentation
Title:

SheffieldSheffield Lake City School District

Description:

SheffieldSheffield Lake City School District – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 138
Provided by: luve
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SheffieldSheffield Lake City School District


1
Sheffield-Sheffield Lake City School District
  • Curriculum Update
  • October, 2009
  • Presented by Linda Bertsch Uveges, PhD

2
Understanding your folder
  • Our local report card
  • Comparison District information
  • Achievement Test Data
  • Analysis of Data
  • Action plan for the district
  • Goals in place for FY10

3
Our local report card
4
(No Transcript)
5
Multiple Measures
  • Designation is based on
  • Number of indicators (out of 30)
  • Performance Index Score (out of 120)
  • AYP Status (Met/Not Met)
  • Amount of growth using value-added calculation
  • I will explain each of these and then show you
    how we received our designation...

6
The first thing the typical resident sees
  • Designation
  • Multiple measures
  • Performance index and growth calculation
    recognize the achievement levels of students, as
    well as progress over time
  • Accountability for various groups of students
  • Economically disadvantaged students
  • Students from major racial and ethnic groups
  • Students with disabilities
  • Students with limited English proficiency

7
First thing we want to look atDistrict
DESIGNATION
8
Refresher what are the designations?
  • Excellent with Distinction
  • Excellent
  • Effective
  • Continuous Improvement
  • Academic Watch
  • Academic Emergency

9
Next we look at the number of indicators we met
10
What are the indicators?
30
11
How did we do with indicators?
  • Take a look at your copy- I circled the ones we
    got

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Skips question about Cohorts
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Next. Performance INDEX
  • Shows the performance index calculations and
    resulting performance index score for a building
    based upon achievement test/OGT results
  • We earn points based on how well each student
    does on each test for each student
  • 1.2 points ADVANCED score
  • 1.1 points ACCELERATED score
  • 1.0 points PROFICIENT score
  • 0.6 points BASIC score
  • 0.3 points LIMITED score
  • 0.0 points untested students

19
We look at the Local Report card again
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Next, we look at Progress (AYP)
29
Refresher What is AYP?
  • AYP goals detail the percentage of students who
    must score proficient or above in READING AND
    MATH, the percentage of enrolled students who
    must participate in READING ANDMATH testing, and
    the percentage who must be in attendance and
    graduate during the school year

30
And.
  • AYP goals for the percentage of proficient and
    participating students are applied to each school
    AND district as well as to each of 10 student
    groups within a school and district

31
AND..
  • AYP graduation and attendance goals are applied
    to schools and district, but not each student
    group

32
And.
  • Failure to meet any of the proficient or
    participation goals, attendance levels and/or
    graduation targets, results in the school or
    district missing AYP

33
Lets break it down
  • AYP Adequate Yearly Progress
  • AYP is a federal requirement
  • AYP is for READING and MATH only
  • AYP Summary for a building
  • AYP Participation participation rate
    calculations and results for reading and math for
    the designated subgroups and tested grade levels
  • AYP Proficiency shows the AYP rate calculations
    and results for the designated subgroups in which
    tested grade levels are combined by tested
    subjects

34
Back to the local report card
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
So what do I look at?
  • Subgroups are listed
  • Students required to take the test
  • Students who actually TOOK the test
  • Participation rate
  • 2 years combined (required to test)
  • 2 years combined (who actually took it)
  • 2 year average rate
  • AYP participation rate TARGET
  • Indicator met/not met based on the RATE TARGET

42
SUBGROUPS
  • All students
  • Native American
  • Hispanic
  • Limited English Proficient
  • African-American
  • Asian/Pacific
  • Multi-Racial
  • Economically Disadvantaged
  • Students with Disabilities
  • The minimum size a subgroup must reach to be
    included in AYP calculations is 30
  • The minimum size a subgroup must reach to be
    included in AYP is 45 for students with
    disabilities
  • The subgroup size for each school and district
    will be combined for all in tested grade

43
See TARGET sheet
  • By the year 2014 all must be proficient!

44
Back to the local report card
45
Growth Calculation (Value-Added)
46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
(No Transcript)
49
(No Transcript)
50
So, how did we receive our designation?
  • Take a look at the back of Local Report Card

51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
(No Transcript)
54
How did we do vs. county?
55
(No Transcript)
56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
(No Transcript)
62
(No Transcript)
63
(No Transcript)
64
(No Transcript)
65
(No Transcript)
66
(No Transcript)
67
(No Transcript)
68
(No Transcript)
69
(No Transcript)
70
(No Transcript)
71
(No Transcript)
72
(No Transcript)
73
(No Transcript)
74
(No Transcript)
75
(No Transcript)
76
(No Transcript)
77
(No Transcript)
78
(No Transcript)
79
(No Transcript)
80
(No Transcript)
81
(No Transcript)
82
(No Transcript)
83
(No Transcript)
84
(No Transcript)
85
(No Transcript)
86
(No Transcript)
87
(No Transcript)
88
(No Transcript)
89
(No Transcript)
90
(No Transcript)
91
(No Transcript)
92
(No Transcript)
93
(No Transcript)
94
(No Transcript)
95
(No Transcript)
96
(No Transcript)
97
(No Transcript)
98
(No Transcript)
99
(No Transcript)
100
(No Transcript)
101
(No Transcript)
102
(No Transcript)
103
(No Transcript)
104
(No Transcript)
105
(No Transcript)
106
(No Transcript)
107
(No Transcript)
108
(No Transcript)
109
(No Transcript)
110
(No Transcript)
111
County results vs. comparisons
  • Similar districts give us a better understanding
    of how we did measured against districts that are
    most similar to ours

112
(No Transcript)
113
(No Transcript)
114
(No Transcript)
115
(No Transcript)
116
(No Transcript)
117
(No Transcript)
118
(No Transcript)
119
(No Transcript)
120
(No Transcript)
121
(No Transcript)
122
(No Transcript)
123
(No Transcript)
124
(No Transcript)
125
(No Transcript)
126
(No Transcript)
127
(No Transcript)
128
(No Transcript)
129
(No Transcript)
130
(No Transcript)
131
(No Transcript)
132
(No Transcript)
133
(No Transcript)
134
(No Transcript)
135
Action Plan
  • Literacy Committee- district-wide
  • Piloting new language arts Pre-K-5
  • Literacy focus
  • Accelerated Reader
  • Fundations
  • Wilson Reading Program
  • Homework Committee

136
  • Performance Tracker
  • Curriculum Connector
  • Assessment Builder
  • Performance Tracker- data warehouse

137
  • Regionally McRels classroom walkthroughs
  • Marzano- Pinnacle Plus (7.10)
  • 24/7 Concept expansion
  • Websites
  • High Schools That Work
  • Making Middle Grades Work
  • Revising Textbook/curriculum adoption for a
    research year
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com