Observations of Magnetic Fields in normal Galaxies Rainer Beck

1 / 92
About This Presentation
Title:

Observations of Magnetic Fields in normal Galaxies Rainer Beck

Description:

Dmitry Sokoloff, Vladimir Shoutenkov (Moscow) Peter Frick, Igor Patrickeyev (Perm) ... Halo fields (see next talk by Ralf-J rgen Dettmar) Observation of ... –

Number of Views:84
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 93
Provided by: Beck105
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Observations of Magnetic Fields in normal Galaxies Rainer Beck


1
Observations ofMagnetic Fields in (normal)
Galaxies Rainer BeckElly Berkhuijsen, Marita
Krause, Wolfgang Reich, Richard Wielebinski,
Maik Wolleben (Bonn)Ralf-Jürgen Dettmar, Volker
Heesen (Bochum)Chris Chyzy, Marian Soida, Marek
Urbanik (Krakow)Andrew Fletcher, Anvar Shukurov
(Newcastle) Dmitry Sokoloff, Vladimir Shoutenkov
(Moscow)Peter Frick, Igor Patrickeyev
(Perm)Matthias Ehle (Madrid) Julienne Harnett
(South Pole)
2
Fundamental questions
  • STRUCTURE
  • What are the strength and structure of the
    magnetic fields in the interstellar and
    intergalactic medium ?
  • What is the interplay between fields and gas ?
  • EVOLUTION
  • How were magnetic fields amplified and maintained
    and how did they evolve as galaxies evolve ?
  • ORIGIN
  • When and how were the first magnetic fields
    generated ?

3
Motivations to study magnetic fields in galaxies
  • Understand their dynamical importance
  • Map gas flows
  • Map ram pressure and interactions
  • Understand cosmic-ray propagation
  • Determine age of cosmic-ray electrons (see
    posters 10 and 59)
  • Input to MHD models

4
Outline
  • Field strength energy density
  • Structure of the regular field
  • Magnetic fields in the Milky Way
  • Halo fields
  • (see next talk by Ralf-Jürgen Dettmar)

5
Observation of magnetic fields
  • Optical polarization (absorption by aligned,
    rotating, paramagnetic dust grains)
  • Infrared polarization (emission from aligned dust
    grains)
  • Zeeman effect
  • Radio synchrotron emission
  • Faraday rotation

(remember Dick Crutchers talk)
6
NGC6946 Optical polarization (Fendt et al. 1998)
  • Distorted
  • by scattered
  • light !

7
VLA
Effelsberg
ATCA
8
M51 Total intensity (Fletcher, Beck et al. 2005)
  • Total
  • synchrotron
  • intensity traces
  • the total
  • magnetic
  • field

9
M51 Polarized intensity (Fletcher, Beck et al.
2005)
  • Polarized
  • synchrotron
  • intensity traces
  • the regular
  • magnetic field

10
Chapter OneHow strong are interstellar
magnetic fields ?
11
(Total field)2 (turbulent field)2
(regular field)2
12
Measuring total field strength
  • Equipartition between energy densities of
    magnetic fields and total cosmic rays
  • Input
  • Synchrotron intensity
  • Ratio K of proton/electron number densities at
    GeV energies (K100 for shock acceleration)
  • Energy spectral index of dominating protons,
    represented by the radio spectral index
  • Problems
  • Electrons suffer from energy losses which modify
    their spectrum and hence K
  • Textbook formula uses integration of the radio
    spectrum between two frequencies
  • Textbook formula is wrong !

13
Revised equipartition formula(based on
integration of the proton spectrum)
  • Beq,- ? ( Isync (K1) / L ) 1/(3a)
  • Isync Synchroton intensity
  • K Proton/electron ratio (at GeV energies)
  • L Pathlength through source
  • a Synchrotron spectral index (S ? ?-? )

14
Beck Krause (2004)
15
Equipartition field estimates
  • The classical estimate is too high for radio
    spectral indices of 0.7 and field strengths of
    gt10µG.
  • The popular choice of K0 or K1 (e.g. for radio
    lobes and clusters) is not justified, so that the
    eq. field estimate is too low by 3x.
  • Energy losses of electrons further increase K, so
    that the eq. field estimate is too low.
  • As electron propagation speed is limited, they
    may not illuminate the field outside star
    formation regions, where the eq. field estimate
    is too low.

16
Synchrotron Ages
  • tsyn 1 Gyr (B- /µG)-1.5 (?syn /GHz)-0.5
  • An underestimate in
  • B- leads to an
  • overestimate of the
  • synchrotron age
  • ( an underestimate
  • of the propagation
  • speed)

?syn
17
There are magnetic fields inside and outside of
the ring !
18
Total field strengths
  • Niklassurvey of 74 spiral galaxies
  • ltBtotgt 9 µG

Niklas 1995
19
Equipartition magnetic field strengths in M51
Fletcher,Beck, et al. 2005
20
Synchrotron losses of cosmic-ray electrons in M51
21
Magnetic fields in the inner spiral arms of M51
  • Arm Inter-arm
  • Total magnetic field 25 ?G 20?G
  • Regular magnetic field 15 ?G 15
    ?G
  • Turbulent magnetic field 20 ?G 13
    ?G
  • Turbulent fields are strongest in spiral arms
  • Regular fields are strong in arm interarm
    regions
  • Interarm fields are underestimated due to
    synchrotron loss of the electrons

22
NGC6946 (Beck Hoernes 1996)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Energy densities in NGC6946
  • (Beck 2004)
  • Emagn Eturb (inner disk)
  • Emagn gt Eturb (outer disk)
  • Emagn Etherm (everywhere)
  • ß Etherm/Emagnlt 1

25
Radial scale lengths in NGC6946
  • Cold gas 4 kpc
  • Turbulent motions 4 kpc
  • Warm gas 4 kpc
  • Cosmic rays 8 kpc
  • Magnetic field 16 kpc

26
Magnetic fields (and cosmic rays) extend far
beyond the star formation regions but there is
no supernova-driven turbulence - evidence for
magneto-rotational instability (MRI) ?
27
NGC1097 Center Beck et al. 2004
28
NGC7552 Center Harnett et al. 2004
29
Equipartition field strengths in starbursts
  • Starburst galaxies 30 - 50µG
  • NGC 1097 (ring knots) 60µG
  • NGC 7552 (ring knots) 100µG
  • The strongest extended fields detected so far
    in spiral galaxies
  • (still lower limits due to bremsstrahlung loss)

30
Mass inflow by magnetic stress
  • dM/dt - h/O (ltbr bFgt Br BF)
  • (Balbus Hawley 1998)
  • NGC1097
  • h100pc, v450km/s, brbF60µG
  • dM/dt 1 Mo / yr

31
Open questions - I
  • On which scales in space time is equipartition
    between fields and cosmic rays valid ?
  • How far out do the magnetic fields extend in
    galaxies ?
  • Can the fields affect gas rotation in the
    outermost regions of galaxies ?

32
Comparison of M51 maps
Greenawalt et al. 1998
Fletcher et al. 2005
33
Comparison of M51 maps
Roussel et al. 2001
Fletcher et al. 2005
34
Wavelet scale-by-scale correlation in M51(using
isotropic 2-D wavelets)
15?m against total radio intensity
Patrickeyev, Fletcher, et al. (2004)
35
The radio infrared correlation
  • One of the tightest correlations in astronomy !
  • The correlation may be the result of field
    coupling in gas clouds Btot ? ?0.5
  • (where ? is the gas density averaged over a
    large volume)
  • and of the Schmidt law SFR ? ?1.4
  • (Niklas Beck 1997)

36
Parker 1972
37
Open questions - II
  • How does the coupling between fields and gas work
    ? Which gas component takes care of this relation
    ?
  • Does the radio-IR correlation break down at low
    SFR ?
  • Does the correlation break down at small spatial
    and/or time scales ?
  • Does the correlation break down at high redshifts
    (very young galaxies in the early Universe)?

38
Chapter TwoStrength and structure of regular
magnetic fields
39
Measuring regular fields
  • Polarized emission (and angles)
  • I ? ? nCR B-1a dl
  • Faraday rotation measures of the diffuse
    polarized emission
  • RM ? ? ne B dl
  • RM grid of polarized background sources (see
    poster 36 by Bryan Gaensler)

40
The regular field has two components
  • Anisotropic turbulent field with
    frequent reversals
  • (due to shear, compression or the
  • magneto-rotational instability)
  • Coherent field
  • with constant direction
  • (generated by the large-scale,
  • mean-field dynamo)

41
A regular magnetic field is not always a coherent
(mean) field
Polarization weak strong
strong ? regular field no yes
yes
Faraday rotation weak strong
weak ? coherent field no yes
no
42
Regular magnetic fields prefer spiral patterns
43
(No Transcript)
44
NGC4414 (Soida et al. 2002)
  • Flocculent galaxies
  • spiral field without
  • spiral arms

45
NGC4449 (Chyzy et al. 2000)
  • Large
  • Irregulars
  • some
  • traces of
  • spiral field

46
IC10 (Chyzy et al. 2005)
  • Small
  • Irregulars
  • no spiral
  • field

47
(No Transcript)
48
NGC1097 Center (Beck et al. 2004)
49
Regular magnetic fields prefer quiet regions
50
NGC6946 (Beck Hoernes 1996)
  • Magnetic arms

51
(No Transcript)
52
Regular fieldsfollow the density-wave spiral arms
53
(No Transcript)
54
Magnetic field and molecular gas
Polarized intensity (EffelsbergVLA) and BIMA CO
data (Regan et al. 2001)
55
  • Resolution
  • 4
  • (200pc)

56
Inner spiral arms of M51
TWO components of the regular field !
gas flow
Green CO Blue radio polarization
3?
inter-arm
arm
Patrickeyev, Fletcher, et al. (2004)
57
Regular fields follow the shearing gas
flowaround massive bars
58
NGC1097 (Beck et al. 2004)
59
NGC1097 (Beck et al. 2004)
60
NGC1365 (Beck et al. 2004)
61
Regular fields are impressed by external forces
62
NGC 4254 Polarized Intensity B-Vectors
NGC4254 (Chyzy et al.)
63
NGC3627 (Soida et al. 2001)
64
The Antennae (Chyzy Beck 2004)
65
Regular fields results
  • Field lines form spiral patterns (even in
    flocculent and irregular galaxies and in
    circumnuclear rings)
  • Two populations of strong regular fields
  • (1) Magnetic arms in interarm regions of
    galaxies with prominent spiral arms
  • (M51, M81, NGC6946,...)
  • (2) on or inside massive molecular spiral arms of
    galaxies with strong density waves (M51)
  • Field lines follow the gas flow around bars
  • Field lines may be strongly distorted by tidal
    forces or ram pressure

66
Faraday rotation is the key to detect coherent
fields and to test dynamos
67
M31 very regular (coherent) field revealed by
rotation measures
Fletcher et al. 2004
The coherent magnetic field in M31 is the best
evidence so far for dynamo action !
68
M51 chaotic rotation measures
Fletcher et al. 2005
150 rad m-2 0 rad m-2 -150 rad m-2
The regular magnetic field in M51 is not a
coherent field!
69
Large-scale modesof the coherent field
  • Simple RM patterns, i.e. a single dominant
    axisymmetric (m0) mode are rare.
  • (M31, IC342, LMC see poster 35 by Bryan
    Gaensler)
  • Dominating bisymmetric (m1) modes are even rarer
    (M81 is the only candidate).
  • Magnetic arms can be described as a superposition
    of the m0 and m2 modes.
  • A superposition of 3 (or more) modes is needed in
    most cases, but these cannot be resolved by
    present-day data.

70
Preferred direction ?
F.Krause Beck (1998)
71
Open questions - III
  • Does the regular magnetic field affect the gas
    flow ?
  • Do magnetic fields help to form spiral arms ?
  • Is the radial component of spiral fields
    preferably directed inwards ?
  • Do shear or compression generate anisotropic
    turbulent fields ?
  • Can dynamos explain the coherent fields ?

72
Do dynamos work in galaxies ?
  • YES
  • Spiral fields occur almost everywhere, even
  • in irregular galaxies and central rings
  • Pitch angles are as predicted
  • Magnetic arms occur between gas arms
  • Large-scale coherent fields exist
  • There is at least one case of a
  • dominating axisymmetric mode (M31)

73
Do dynamos work in galaxies ?
  • NO
  • - Single dominating modes are rare
  • (nonlinear dynamos?)
  • - Coherent fields are surprisingly weak in
  • galaxies with strong density waves (M51)
  • (strong compression and/or shear?)
  • - Spiral fields extend well into the centers
  • - Dynamos cannot explain the preferred
  • inward direction (large-scale seed fields?)
  • - Fields are still strong in outer galaxies
  • (magneto-rotational instability?)

74
(No Transcript)
75
Finally, Chapter ThreeMagnetic fields in the
Milky Way
76
Galactic center (La Rosa et al. 2000)
  • (see talks by
  • Giles Novak
  • and
  • Farhad Yusef-Zadeh)

77
21cm Stockert Villa Elisa all-sky survey
(Reich Reich 1986)
78
Equipartition fields in the Galaxy (Berkhuijsen,
priv. comm.)
79
  • Galactic polarization
  • shows the details

80
21cm DRAOVilla Elisa all-sky polarization
survey (Wolleben et al. 2004)
81
Synchrotron Emission from the Milky Way (Perseus
- Auriga)
b4
Galactic polarization opens a new domain to study
small-scale magnetic fields
b-4
l150
l166
Total emission
Polarized emission
Effelsberg 21cm (Reich et al 2003)
82
21cm ATCA southern Galactic plane survey
(Gaensler et al. 2001)
83
11cm Effelsberg Galactic plane survey (Duncan et
al. 1999)
84
Large-scale fields in the Milky Way
?
Han et al. 2001
85
Future needs
  • Higher sensitivity
  • Higher angular resolution
  • Wider frequency bands
  • More attention to magnetic fields in the
    astronomical community

86
The Square Kilometer Array ( S K A )
  • The future of nonthermal radio astronomy

87
SKA Concepts
88
SKA Key Science
  • - Testing Theories of Gravitation with pulsars
  • - The Dark Ages
  • Epoch of re-ionisation, first black holes
  • - The Cradle of Life
  • Protoplanets, biomolecules, SETI
  • - Evolution Large-scale Structure Galaxies,
    Hubble Flow Dark Energy
  • - Cosmic Magnetism (poster 36)

89
Rotation Measures in the Milky Way
Pulsars to be detected with the SKA (Cordes 2001)
90
RMs Through Galaxies
RMs of 21 polarized sources shining through M31
(Han et al 1998)
91
TRACE 2000 (Sun in X-rays)
SKA 2015 (galaxies in radio)
92
Fundamental questions
  • STRUCTURE v
  • EVOLUTION
  • ORIGIN (enjoy the Friday session !)
  • You are invited to attend the conference
  • Origin Evolution of Cosmic Magnetism
  • Bologna, 2005 Aug 29 - Sep 2
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com