Dataset: 3581 images from Photo'net Datta et al', 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Dataset: 3581 images from Photo'net Datta et al', 2006

Description:

Actually, estimated over a finite set of ratings ... photos with ~65% precision, while wrongly eliminating only ~9% high-quality photos. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: cse56
Category:
Tags: dataset | datta | images | net | photo | wrongly

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dataset: 3581 images from Photo'net Datta et al', 2006


1
Learning the Consensus on Visual
Quality for Next-Generation Image Management
Ritendra Datta, Jia Li, and James Z. Wang The
Pennsylvania State University, University Park,
PA, USA
PROBLEM SPECIFICATION
EXPERIMENTS
METHODOLOGY
  • Dataset 3581 images from Photo.net Datta et
    al., 2006
  • Aesthetics scoring scale 1-7
  • We have averages scores and count nk of
    ratings for Ik
  • Characteristics of Dataset
  • Results
  • Formally, define consensus on quality for image
    Ik as
  • where qk,i is the ith user rating received
  • Actually, estimated over a finite set of ratings
    ?
  • Useful for the average user Our target
    audience
  • May not be useful for the outlier user
    Personalized recommendations?
  • Let us have D visual features
    that correlate with quality
  • In the literature Datta et al., ECCV 2006
    56 features higher-order terms
  • Brightness, Contrast, DOF, Saturation, Region
    Composition, etc.
  • (A) Learn a Weighted Least Squares Linear
    Regressor
  • Directly learn a mapping from features to
    consensus scores
  • Weights related to trust associated with score
  • Greater the no. of samples n, better estimate
    is of
  • Formulation
  • Convenient parameter estimation
  • Here,
    and denotes pseudoinverse.
  • Photo-sharing is getting popular
  • Dedicated Websites
  • Flickr, Photobucket, Photo.net, etc.
  • Bundled with social networking sites
  • Facebook, Orkut, MySpace, etc.
  • Personal Photo Collections are growing
  • Cheap digital cameras and storage
  • Organizing them can be time-consuming
  • Many methods for topic-based management
  • Image classification
  • Content-based image search/annotation
  • Collaborative tagging architectures
  • How about quality-based photo management?
  • Can we distinguish these photos
  • (Rated over 6 out of 7 on average by many
    Photo.net users)
  • from these ones?

On an average, picks 20 high-quality (HIGH5.5)
photos with 82 precision, while SVM-based
method gets less than 50
On an average, eliminates 50 low-quality
(LOW4.5) photos with 65 precision, while
wrongly eliminating only 9 high-quality photos.
The SVM figures are 43 and 28 resp.
Selection/Elimination
Sort Descending
HIGH QUALITY
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Apply Regressor Predict N scores
  • Encouraging results, moving toward real-world
    applicability.
  • Proposed features in Datta et al. 2006 show
    more promise.
  • Weighting training data by confidence improves
    performance.

Sort Ascending
Collection of N images
LOW QUALITY
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com