Z-06-03 (Brewer) Z-06-04 (Shaw)

1
Z-06-03 (Brewer)Z-06-04 (Shaw)

• Two applications to rezone approximately 18 acres
  from RU-4 to TR-36 and approximately 92 acres
  from RU-4 to RU-2 for purposes of establishing
  two subdivisions with a total of 64 proposed
  dwelling units in the Babocomari Plan Area.

2
Summary of Requests
Z-06-03 (Brewer) Z-06-04 (Shaw)
Parcel 106-15-015F 106-15-020B
Parcel Size 30 acres 80 acres
Proposed Zoning TR-36 and RU-2 RU-2
Growth Category B and D D
Plan Designation LDR-1 and RR RR
Number of Units 24 40
3
Summary of Requests

• Two separate rezoning applications represented
  by the same person
• Same provisions as those of previous rezonings
  in the Babocomari Plan area including the same
  CCRs, and service by the Whetstone Water
  Improvement District and Whetstone Fire District
• A total of 64 dwelling units proposed in concept
  plans

4
Subject Properties
RR
LDR-1
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
Water Budget

• RU-4 projected consumption (27 lots) 24
  ac-ft/yr
• Projected Consumption for proposed (64 lots)
  10 ac-ft/yr
• 82 gpcd for Whetstone Water Improvement District
  vs. 312 gpcd for RU-4
• Building Envelopes 15,000 sq. ft. (TR-36)
  25,000 sq. ft. (RU-2)
• Turf Limits
• Mesquite Removal
• Drought-Tolerant Landscaping
• Hot Water Recirculation
• Storm Water Recharge

8
East Ronald Reagan Parkway
9
East Unnamed Access Road
10
North Parcel 106-15-020B
11

• Protests and Support
• Z-06-03 (Brewer) None.
• Z-06-04 (Shaw) One protest two support.

12
Factors Favoring Approval

• Rezoning to TR-36 in areas designated as LDR-1
  achieves a gross density no greater than one
  house per acre and is in substantial conformance
  with the Babocomari Area Plan.
• Rezoning to RU-2 in areas designated as RR is in
  substantial conformance with the Babocomari Area
  Plan.
• The housing stock in the county would increase
  through subdivision rather than lot-splitting.
• The TR-36 and RU-2 districts are a logical
  transition from the GB to the west and TR-18 to
  the north to the RU-4 to the east.
• As a part of the Countys subdivision process and
  as required by ADOT, the developers of the
  subject parcels must collaborate with other
  developers in providing access improvements that
  result in safe ingress off of and egress onto
  Highway 90.
• The proposed subdivisions would be a part of the
  Whetstone Water Improvement District (not on
  individual wells), would be subject to water
  conservation CCRs, and are projected to consume
  less water than if the zoning remained RU-4..

13
Factors Favoring Denial

• Improvements to accommodate the additional
  traffic generated by the proposed subdivisions
  are necessary.
• Overall density would increase nearly
  two-and-a-half times over that which would occur
  under existing zoning.

14
Staff Recommendation

• The Planning Department recommends forwarding
  these requests to the BOS for approval with the
  following conditions
• The maximum number of dwelling units is 64 (24
  Brewer, 40 Shaw) and a subdivision review process
  is required.
• Prior to any subdivision plat approval, the
  applicants shall
• participate in a TIA with other developers
• commit to a development agreement or other
  acceptable mechanism specifying the funding,
  timing, and responsibility for improvements
  stipulated in the TIA
• participate in a comprehensive hydrology report
  to address the areas drainage and floodplain
  issues.
• 3. All future subdivisions shall include specific
  disclosure language in the general notes and
  CCRs regarding military activities in the area
  as drafted and approved by Fort Huachuca.

15
Planning Zoning Commission Recommendation

• On March 8, 2006, the Planning Zoning
  Commission voted unanimously to forward a
  recommendation of approval of these rezoning
  requests with the aforementioned conditions to
  the Board of Supervisors.