PIERRE BOURDIEU

1
PIERRE BOURDIEU

• The Sociology of
• Class, Lifestyle and Power

2
Bourdieus Key Claims

• Social class is the basic social fact
• We continue to live in highly stratified,
  unequal, class-based societies
• Society works to keep the upper classes powerful
  and the lower classes powerless
• THE WINNERS KEEP WINNING
• THE LOSERS KEEP LOSING
• 4. A lot of this happens unintentionally
  NOTdeliberate manipulation by the powerful

3
OUTLINE

1. Bourdieus biography
2. Main aims
3. Social action
4. Habitus, capital, field
5. Education field
6. Social reproduction social mobility
7. Criticisms

4
Bourdieus Biography

• 1930 2002
• - Born in the Béarn region of France
• - Peasant background
• - Star pupil degrees in philosophy
• and anthropology
• - Professor of Sociology, College de France
  (1980)
• - Political figure Media personality
• - An Outsiders Sociology

5
Main Aims

• To understand why social inequalities
• a) are reproduced over time
• Retention of wealth, prestige, power by elites
• (reproduction)
• b) are generally accepted by the lower classes
• To liberate social actors from oppressive social
  and mental conditions
• - reveals structures actors not fully aware of
• - shows society could be organised differently

6
Main Aims

• 3) Reconcile and synthesise separate schools of
  sociological thought
• Marxism (social class power)
• Durkheimian sociology (division of labour
  cultures of different groups)
• Weberian sociology (focus on social action
  attention to empirical details)
• Phenomenology
• (how people perceive the world they live in how
  social power shapes perceptions)

7
Main Aims

• 4) Transcend dualisms
• Subjective OR Objective
• Social Structure OR Action/Agency
  (Structuration)
• Theory OR Empirical data
• Quantitative OR Qualitative
• Use of multiple research methods
• Interviews, questionnaires, documents, etc.

8
Main Aims

• 5) Connect different social spheres
• Sociology of education, sociology of politics,
  sociology of mass media, etc.
• See how each sphere connects with, and affects,
  the others
• 6) Encourage reflexivity
• Sociology of sociology
• See how social forces shape the ways in which
  sociologists see things
• - Sociologist studies him/herself sociologically

9
Social Action

• (Weber Parsons)
• 1) A person
• who has resources
• 2) Person thinks in certain ways
• has certain goals
• thinks of ways (means) to achieve them
• goals and means shaped by culture
• 3) Has to act in particular social contexts
• Contexts shape the persons thinking acting
• Contexts shape how successful (or not) the person
  is in achieving their goals

10

• Bourdieu on social action
• 1) A person has particular goals
• (these may be thought about fully consciously or
  only semi-consciously mostly the latter)
• 2) They try to pursue those goals using certain
  strategies
• (also consciously or semi-consciously mostly the
  latter)

11

• 3) They have certain resources at their disposal
• (Social inequality some people have more
  resources than others)
• 4) They act in certain social contexts
• Success
• 1) having a large amount of the right sort of
  resources for particular contexts
• 2) having appropriate strategies for those
  contexts
• Failure
• 1) having the wrong sort of resources for those
  contexts
• 2) having inappropriate strategies for those
  contexts

12

• Bourdieus terminology for social action
• A person (social agent)
• - shaped by a habitus
• - has certain sorts of resources (capital)
• b) Person thinks in certain ways
• - thinking is semi-conscious practical
  reasoning
• - thinking (both goals and strategies) shaped by
  the habitus

13

• c) Person has to act in particular social
  contexts
• (fields)
• d) Person has to interact with other people
• (games)
• (Actors players)
• e) General rule
• How successful a person is in a particular field
  depends on how appropriate their habitus and
  capital is for the game played in that field

14

• f) Sporting analogy
• Social life is a series of games
• ii) You need the right skills to play those games
  successfully
• e.g. tennis skills playing rugby
• iii) Skills using the capital you possess
• iv) Your habitus influences the AMOUNT AND TYPE
  of capital you possess

15

• v) The more of the right sorts of capital you
  have for a specific game ?
• - the better, more successful, player in that
  game you will be
• EXAMPLE the game of education
• Appropriate skills cultural capital
• Appropriate habitus upper middle class habitus
• Inappropriate skills lack of cultural capital
• Inappropriate habitus lower working class
  habitus

16
Habitus, Capital, Field

• Habitus (plural habitus)
• Components
• - ways of thinking / ways of acting
• - bodily habits
• - tastes likes and dislikes
• Whole way of life / lifestyle

17

• a) Each class has its own habitus
• Working class habitus
• Middle class habitus
• Lower working class (least capital)
• Upper working class (some capital)
• Lower middle class (more capital)
• Upper middle class (most capital)
• b) Each individuals habitus is the
• habitus of their class
• e.g. working class person, working class habitus

18

• c) Socialised into particular ways of thinking
  and acting
• Primary socialisation family, peers
• Secondary socialisation
• education, media
• d) Experience the habitus as natural (the
  condition of doxa)
• Could have been socialised very differently

19

• e) Each habitus has its own set of tastes
• Likes / dislikes
• Beautiful / disgusting
• Moral / immoral, etc.
• f) Tastes are socially stratified
• Upper middle class taste regarded as highest
• Lower middle class taste regarded as middling
• Working class taste regarded as lowest

20

• g) Cultural power
• Elites have the power to define their tastes and
  their culture as the best
• - the most sophisticated, refined,
  tasteful, etc.
• Upper middle class habitus - sense of superiority
• Lower middle class habitus aspirational
• Working class habitus sense of inferiority
  defensiveness mocking of middle class
  pretentions

21
BOURDIEU - RECAP

• 1. Society still very much class-based
• 2. Reproduction of privilege
• Elites pass advantages onto their children
• Non-elites pass disadvantages onto their children
  
• 3. Social life is a series of games, occurring in
  fields
• Success appropriate habitus capital
• HABITUS, CAPITAL, FIELD

22

• Capital
• HOW MUCH capital does a person have?
• WHAT TYPE of capital does a person have?
• Economic capital
• - money resources
• Cultural capital
• knowledge of legitimate culture / High
  Culture
• refined manners
• Linguistic capital speaking properly
• Social capital
• - social networks (knowing influential people)

23

• a) AMOUNT TYPE of capital
• gt class membership
• e.g. LOW AMOUNT of all 3 TYPES
• lower working class
• e.g. HIGH AMOUNT of all 3 TYPES upper middle
  class
• b) Habitus STRONGLY INFLUENCES both the amount
  type of capital a person has
• The more upper middle class the habitus
• gt the more capital the person has

24
Cultural Capital Economic Capital
(Upper WC)
(Lower WC)
25

• Field
• a) Level of individuals experiences
• - different social contexts
• e.g. school, work, leisure
• - contexts where social games are played
• b) Level of Society
• - separate social spheres
• e.g. education system, economic system, system of
  leisure and recreation, etc.

26

• c) Fields are based around specific types of
  capital
• e.g. education field educational capital
• (a particular sort of cultural capital)
• d) Success in the game played in a field
• having a large amount of the right type of
  capital for that field
• e) Fields are organised to the advantage of
  elites
• Not level playing fields
• Fields are organised to favour the sorts of
  capital elites happen to possess

27

• f) Reproduction of inequalities
• - Successful actors have large amounts of the
  right sort of capital for the fields they are in
• - They pass that capital onto their children
• - (Opposite unsuccessful actors pass onto their
  children small amounts of useful capital and
  large amounts of useless capital)
• THE WINNERS KEEP WINNING
• THE LOSERS KEEP LOSING
• (Most of the time)

28
EDUCATION FIELD

• Against the conventional view
• Meritocracy intelligence diligence
• Social mobility
• Educational success
• Having the right sort of capital
• Cultural Capital (CC)
• High CC gt good qualifications
• Elites use CC to get large amounts of educational
  capital (good qualifications)

29

• Possessors of high CC
• Upper middle class
• Comes from their habitus (esp. home life)
• Possessors of intermediate CC
• Lower middle classes
• Possessors of low CC
• Working classes (esp. Lower WC)
• Habitus gt CC gt educational capital

30

• Hidden curriculum
• 1) Unintentional evaluations by teachers
• Conscious level
• - Childs intelligence and diligence
• Unconscious level
• Teachers have middle class habitus
• Teachers respect CC
• - Evaluations in terms of amount of CC the child
  has (due to its habitus)
• sloppy work, inarticulate, lazy,
  disruptive, etc.
• articulate, bright, attentive, etc.

31

• 2) Child feels sense of
• - worthiness (if CC is high)
• - unworthiness (if CC is low)
• Feelings translate into effort performance
• Naturally clever / Naturally untalented
• High CC virtuous circle
• Low CC vicious circle
• OUTCOME
• Middle class success and working class failure
  are reproduced across generations
• This happens mostly unintentionally

32

• Social Reproduction
• High cultural capital gt
• High educational capital gt
• Access to good jobs gt
• High wealth (economic capital)
• Upper middle class parents advantage their
  children
• 1) Economic capital gt access to good schools
• 2) Cultural capital gt good at school
• 3) Social capital gt useful connections

33

• Upward social mobility
• It is possible for lower middle and working class
  individuals
• But only for a relatively small number. WHY?
• Capitalist society needs a working class
• Capitalist society needs to show itself as
  meritocratic and democratic
• Everyone goes to school all have the same
  chances
• c) Upper middle classes can play the game
  better
• Easier access to good schools
• Can cope with grade inflation

34

• Downward social mobility
• The upper middle classes greatest fear
• Children occupy lower social positions than
  parents
• Parents pass on capital that is not useful, as
  societys fields change over time
• e.g. high CC gt non-vocational Arts degrees
• BUT if changing economy requires vocational
  technical qualifications gt CC not much use

35

• Middle class defence mechanisms
• Transform one sort of capital into another sort
• 1) Use economic capital to get new sorts of
  educational capital
• - home familiarity with sophisticated technology
• - school extra tuition in employable skills
• 2) Use social capital to get entry into good
  jobs
• 3) Use economic cultural capital to create new
  sorts of jobs
• e.g. cultural service sector jobs
  aromatherapy, interior decoration, style
  consultancy, etc.

36
Criticisms of Bourdieu

• Explains EVERYTHING in terms of habitus, capital
  field
• Circular assumes what he will find
• key concepts supposed to be guides to research
  but turn into certainties
• 3. Overemphasises class?
• - other sources of inequality downplayed?
• non-class-based habitus?
• 4. Outdated and context-specific?
• France in the 1960s/70s
• Society and culture more complex now?
• 5. Defence can use his concepts to understand
  changing social conditions