Stroke, Motivation and Rehabilitation Technology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Stroke, Motivation and Rehabilitation Technology

Description:

Approximately 450,000 dependant on others for assistance with everyday activities. ... Loureiro, R., Amirabdollahian, F., Topping, M., Driessen, B. & Harwin,W. (2003) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:124
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: oem60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Stroke, Motivation and Rehabilitation Technology


1
Stroke, Motivation and Rehabilitation Technology
  • Ruth Moore
  • Sheffield Hallam University
  • December 2008

2
The Smart Consortium
3
Stroke Incidence
  • 1999 110,000 had first stroke
  • 54,000 survived
  • 900,000 people living in England have survived a
    stroke
  • Approximately 450,000 dependant on others for
    assistance with everyday activities.
  • National clinical guideline for diagnosis and
    initial management of acute stroke and transient
  • ischaemic attack (TIA) 2008 Royal College of
    Physicians

4
Motivation
  • Motivation refers to the influences that govern
    the initiation, direction, intensity and
    persistence of behaviour (Evans 1989)
  • "Motivation of the patient is the most important,
    yet the most difficult part of the work of the
    therapeutic professions..." (O'Gorman, 1975)
  • Motivation occurs at the pre-contemplation,
    contemplation, stages of action (Prochaska
    DiClemente 1983)

5
Motivation
  • Rehabilitation therapists commonly believe that
    motivation affects rehabilitation outcome
    (Maclean et al 2000)
  • Apathy and low motivation are reported by
    rehabilitation staff and family members as being
    one of the most debilitating symptom they deal
    with in rehabilitation (Oddy, Cattran Wood
    2008 Wongpakaran van Reekum 2007).

6
The Theory of Planned Behaviour
  • A persons intention is a central determinant of
    their behaviour

7
The Theory of Planned Behaviour
  • Intention
  • Attitudes toward behaviour
  • Subjective norms
  • Perceived control

8
The Theory of Planned Behaviour
  • Intention
  • Attitudes toward behaviour

9
The Theory of Planned Behaviour
  • Intention
  • Attitudes toward behaviour
  • Good - bad

10
The Theory of Planned Behaviour
  • Intention
  • Attitudes toward behaviour
  • Good - bad
  • Harmful beneficial

11
The Theory of Planned Behaviour
  • Intention
  • Attitudes toward behaviour
  • Good - bad
  • Harmful beneficial
  • Pleasant - unpleasant

12
The Theory of Planned Behaviour
  • Intention
  • Attitudes toward behaviour
  • Subjective norms

13
The Theory of Planned Behaviour
  • Intention
  • Attitudes toward behaviour
  • Subjective norms
  • Perceived control
  • (Ajzen Madden 1986 Ajzen Fishbein 1980)

14
Motivation and Stroke
  • Are these theories relevant to a stroke
    population?

15
Motivation and Stroke
  • Are these theories relevant to a stroke
    population?
  • Does rehabilitation technology satisfactorily
    combine these theories?

16
Motivation and Stroke
  • Are these theories relevant to a stroke
    population?
  • Does rehabilitation technology satisfactorily
    combine these theories?
  • Do users report a change in their motivation for
    rehabilitation using rehabilitation technology?

17
Rehabilitation
  • Functional rehabilitation is more engaging
  • (Merians et al 2006 Loureiro et al 2003
    Amirabdollahian et al. 2007)

18
Rehabilitation
  • Functional rehabilitation is more engaging
  • (Merians et al 2006 Loureiro et al 2003
    Amirabdollahian et al. 2007)
  • Repetition of movement increases recovery
  • (Gaggioloi et al. 2006 Liebermann et al 2006)

19
Rehabilitation
  • Functional rehabilitation is more engaging
  • Merians et al 2006 Loureiro et al 2003
    Amirabdollahian et al. 2007
  • Repetition of movement increases recovery
  • Gaggioloi et al. 2006 Liebermann et al 2006
  • Once discharged from inpatient care patients
    access to community physiotherapy is limited
  • Enderby Wade 2001

20
Rehabilitation Technology
21
Rehabilitation Technology
22
Rehabilitation Technology
23
Rehabilitation Technology
24
Rehabilitation Technology Motivation
25
Rehabilitation Technology Motivation
  • Rehabilitation planning (Holmqvist von Koch
    2001)

26
Rehabilitation Technology Motivation
  • Rehabilitation planning (Holmqvist von Koch
    2001)
  • Stroke education (Aujoulat, dHoore Deccache
    2007)

27
Rehabilitation Technology Motivation
  • Rehabilitation planning (Holmqvist von Koch
    2001)
  • Stroke education (Aujoulat, dHoore and Deccache
    2007)
  • Engaging patient in process
  • Goal setting decision making
  • (Siegert 2004 Levack et al. 2006 McClain 2005)

28
Rehabilitation Technology Motivation
  • Rehabilitation planning (Holmqvist von Koch
    2001)
  • Stroke education (Aujoulat, dHoore and Deccache
    2007)
  • Engaging patient in process
  • Goal setting decision making
  • (Siegert 2004 Levack et al. 2006 McClain 2005)
  • Frequency of participation
  • (Gaggioloi et al. 2006 Liebermann et al 2006)

29
Research Questions
  • Would the introduction of rehabilitation
    technology effect the motivation, participation
    and engagement of stroke patients in
    rehabilitation?
  • Does the actuality match the theory?

30
Research Questions
  • What do therapists think?

31
Research Questions
  • What do therapists think?
  • What do therapy educators think?

32
Research Questions
  • What do therapists think
  • What do therapy educators think
  • What did patients and their carers think

33
Methodology
  • Demonstration Interview with therapists
  • Demonstration Interview with therapy educators
  • Patients use of equipment

34
Further Research
  • What would be the experience of patients 2 of 3
    yrs post-stroke?
  • RCT
  • Equipment
  • Quantitative measure of motivation

35
Questions from Research
  • Prototype
  • Carers involvement needed
  • Qualitative vs quantitative data
  • Problems participants may encounter
  • What happens after the study?

36
Thank you for your attention.
  • Any further questions?

37
References
  • AUJOULAT, I. DHOORE, W. DECCACHE, A. (2007).
    Patient empowerment in theory and practice
    Polysemy or cacophony? online. Patient
    education and counselling, 66 (1), 13-20. at
    http//www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TBC
    -4M81C24-2/1/c485e616cadba631194a226cba6aeaa8.
  • Ajzen, I. Fishbein, M. (1980) Understanding
    attitudes predicting social behaviour. New
    Jersy Prentice-Hall
  • Ajzen, I. Madden, TJ. (1986) Prediction of goal
    directed behaviour Attitudes, intentions and
    perceived behavioural control. Journal of
    Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453 474
  • AMIRABDOLLAHIAN, F., et al. (2007). Multivariate
    analysis of the fugl-meyer outcome measures
    assessing the effectiveness of GENTLE/s robot
    mediated stroke therapy. Journal of
    NeuroEngineering and rehabilitation, 4 .
  • Enderby, P. Wade DT. (2001) Community
    Rehabilitation in the United Kingdom. Clinical
    Rehabilitation 15 577 - 581

38
References
  • Evans, P. (1989) Motivation Emotion. Routledge,
    London
  • HOLMQVIST, L. and VON KOCH, L. (2001).
    Environmental factors in stroke rehabilitation.
    British medical journal, 322 1502.
  • GAGGIOLOI, A., et al. (2006). A strategy for
    computer assisted mental practice in stroke.
    Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 20 505.
  • LEVACK, W., et al. (2006). Is goal planning in
    rehabilitation effective? A systematic review.
    Clinical rehabilitation, 20 739.
  • LIEBERMANN, D., BUCHMAN, A. S. and FRANKS, I. M.
    (2006). Enhancement of motor rehabilitation
    through the use of information technologies.
    Clinical biomechanics, 21 8.

39
References
  • Loureiro, R., Amirabdollahian, F., Topping, M.,
    Driessen, B. Harwin,W. (2003). Upper limb
    mediated stroke therapy - GENTLEs approach.
    Autonomous robots, 15 35.
  • Maclean, N., Pound, P., Wolfe, C., Rudd,A.
    (2000). Qualitative analysis of stroke patients'
    motivation for rehabilitation. British medical
    journal, 321 1051.
  • MCCLAIN, C. (2005). Collaborative goal setting.
    Topics in stroke rehabilitation, 12 (4), 56.
  • Merians, A., Poizner, H., Boian, R., Burdea, G.
    Adamovich,S. (2006). Semsorimotor training in a
    virtual reality environment Does it improve
    functional recovery poststroke?
    Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 20 (2),
    252.
  • Oddy, M., Cattran, C., Wood,R. (2008). The
    development of a measure of motivational changes
    following acquired brain injury. Journal of
    clinical and experimental neurology, 1 (8).

40
References
  • Prochaska, JO., DiClemente, CC. (1983). Stages
    and processes of self-change of smoking Toward
    an integrative model of change. Journal of
    Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 390-395.
  • Royal College of Physicians (2008) National
    clinical guideline for diagnosis and initial
    management of acute stroke and transient
    ischaemic attack (TIA)
  • SIEGERT, R., Taylor (2004). Theoretical aspects
    of goal setting and motivation in rehabilitation.
    Disability and rehabilitation, 26 (1), 1.
  • Wongpakaran, N., van Reekum,R. (2007). Apathy
    Clinical issues. Directions in psychiatry, 27
    261.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com