Title: Bez tytulu slajdu
1BUG PROJECT
Information as a basis to establish transboundary
cooperation The experience of the Bug Pilot
Project
Malgorzata Landsberg-Uczciwek Voivodeship
Inspectorate of Environmental Protection in
Szczecin Teresa Zan Regional Water Management
Board in Warsaw
2The Bug River basin is situated in the north-west
part of Ukraine, south-western Belarus and the
central-eastern part of Poland and is within the
Baltic Sea catchment area. The total area of the
Bug basin is 39.4 thousand km2, which is 19.3
of the Vistula basin.
3The area of the basin belongs to the different
administrative regions in each
country. Ukraine 27.4, Belarus
23.4, Poland 49.2 of
total area.
4Transboundary co-operation in the basin
Before 1992
In the agreement between Poland and the USSR on
co-operation in water management (1964), the
countries established monitoring networks on the
bordering part of the river Bug.
5After 1992
Ukraine The agreement between the Governments of
the Republic of Poland and Ukraine on
co-operation in the field of water management on
rivers crossing their mutual border (Kiev,
October 10, 1996).
Belarus The agreement between the Ministry of
Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and
Forestry of Poland, and the State Committee of
the Belarus Republic for Ecology, on
co-operation in the field of environmental
protection (May 20, 1992).
6- Polish-Ukrainian Committee for Co-operation in
the Field of Boundary Waters - a working group for planning,
- a working group for protection against
pollution, - a working group for flood protection, river
regulation and land melioration, - a working group for hydro-meteorology and
hydro- geology, - a working group for accidental pollution control.
7Pilot Project
- The Pilot Project under the UNECE Water
Convention started in January 1997 and
finished in May 2003. - The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was
signed in 1997.
8Pilot Project - objectives
- to demonstrate the implementation of the UNECE
Guidelines on Water Quality Monitoring and
Assessment of Transboundary River - to initiate and/or improve bilateral and
multilateral co-operation, leading to
institutional strengthening and capacity building
under the Convention - to prepare effective and efficient monitoring and
assessment programmes which are sustainable in
the specific economic contexts of the countries
concerned - to support approximation to European Union
environmental legislation in CEEC countries.
9Project realization
10Importance of inception phase
- Important part of the information exchange has
started - - the very first approach to the common
understanding of the transboundary river basin
management, problems/issues in the Bug basin and
quality of water (new for each country), - learning about water policy and willingness to
use European Union legislation (important for
Poland), - political and institutional structure of water
management in each country.
11Inception phase - lessons learnt
- Necessity to make enough available time for good
understanding of the Project. - The river basin approach, integrated water
management, environmental issues and concerns,
the principle of public participation. - Invitation for the right institution and right
people for cooperation (administrative division
and political structure).
12Identification and review of water management
issues
- Legislation, national strategy plans and water
policy (function/uses, problems/issues
information needs) - The area of the Bug River basin is covered by
three riparian countries with different political
and economic systems. Poland was in the process
of accession to the EU, Ukraine adapts its
legislation to the laws of the European Council,
while Belarus uses a separate legislative system.
13Identification and review of water management
issues
- The key steps to formulate information needs are
- identifying functions/uses and problems/issues of
the Bug basin water and - relations between the functions of the basin, the
utilisation of the water and the problems
occurring in the basin.
14Functions and uses of the Bug basin water
(inventorypolicy))
Water use/function Belarus Belarus Poland Poland Ukraine Ukraine Common concern Common concern
Water use/function surface waters groundwaters surface waters ground-waters surface waters ground-waters surface waters ground- waters
Ecological function
Drinking water supply o o
Industrial water supply o o o o
Agriculture o
Fish farms o o o o o
Recreation and angling
Transport of sewage
() accordingly important, () moderately
important and (O) not important of water uses
15Relations between the functions of the basin, the
utilisation of the water and the problems
occurring in the basin (inventory, policy and
experts assessment)
Problems Use/Functions Use/Functions Use/Functions Use/Functions Use/Functions Use/Functions Use/Functions Use/Functions
Problems Ecological function Supply of drinking water Agri-culture Fish-farms Recreation and angling Supplies for the industry Transport medium including sewage Impact on Zegrzynskie Lake
Pollution by nutrients and eutrophication
Microbiological pollution
Organic pollution
Accidental pollution
High variability of flows
Flood hazard River regulation, damming and draining
Pollution by toxic substances
accordingly
moderately
not important as common concern
16Identification and review of water management
issues lessons learnt
- Difficulties to agree upon the most
important,functions/uses of the Bug River water
(ecological?), - problems/issues - differences in common
understanding of water quality, - Identifying the reasons for the problems (lack of
proper data), - common criteria for assessment due to differences
in legislation and technical possibility of labs.
17Report No. 3 deals with the information needs,
selection of indicative parameters and a critical
evaluation of the existing monitoring programmes
in view of fitness for purpose.
18ACHIEVEMENTS
Information on the Bug River basin scale
The Report No. 2 - Identification and Review of
Water Management Issues - can be regarded as the
first step in the development of a River Basin
Management Plan. It describes the river basin,
the functions and uses of the river and its
tributaries, the actual quality status compared
to the requirements of the functions and the main
problems and causes identified from this
comparison.
19ACHIEVEMENTS
Awareness of the information meaning
- The execution of the inventory stage has
made aware the people responsible for water
quality assessment, that getting information
is one of the weakest points of the
management process. - The necessity to collect and process data
from different sectors of economy by river
basins has arisen.
20ACHIEVEMENTS
Closer to the EU legislation
- Most of the methods and standards used in the
Pilot Project and set in the Recommendation
Report are based on the regulations of the
European Union.
21ACHIEVEMENTS
- Joint study trips, samplings, workshops and
discussions bring the co-operating people closer
together within the countries as well as
internationally. This enhances the quality of
co-operation.
22ACHIEVEMENTS
23ACHIEVEMENTS
Perspective of further co-operation
- The proposal of the trilateral agreement on
co-operation in transboundary waters, - Polish-Ukrainian-Belorusian working group on
the implementation of the Pilot Project, - The Pilot Project on implementation of the
UNECE guidelines for groundwaters, - Acceptation of the Report No. 3 by
Polish-Ukrainian Committee for Co-operation in
the Field of Boundary Waters.
24ACHIEVEMENTS
25Which tasks have not been completed?
- Lack of a trilateral agreement forming the legal
basis of the Early Warning System. - Transboundary information collection and exchange
system. - Assessment of diffuse pollution, risk assessment
and toxicological examinations were not
performed according to the reference conditions
of the Pilot Project.
26Summary
The realization of the Pilot Project for the Bug
River basin opens a new chapter in the
transboundary co-operation between Poland,
Ukraine and Belarus. This co-operation covers the
whole river basin and its basic assumption is the
close relationship between monitoring and
assessment and water management.
27Summary
It is crucial that the Pilot Project will be
implemented immediately after its completion.
This will ensure that recent experiences are used
in routine monitoring. However the full
implementation of the proposed changes can be
difficult because of financial constraints,
therefore this implementation should be gradual
but constant.
28(No Transcript)
29Thank you for your attention