Title: Socioeconomic Aspects of Carbon Sequestration
1Socio-Economic Aspects of Carbon Sequestration
Wealth Ranking Cost-Benefit Analysis Cash-Flow
Analysis (Systems Analysis with STELLA)
Petra Tschakert Arid Lands Resource
Sciences University of Arizona March , 2003
2Decision-Making Processes
3Resource Endowment Groups
- Participatory Wealth Ranking
- Farmers define wealth criteria for 3 groups
- (poor, medium, rich)
- Farmers stratify all households/compounds
according to - the wealth groups defined (3 pots/hats)
- Stratified random sampling to select households/
- compounds for further activities
4Example CriteriaResource Endowment Groups
5Data Collection at HH Level
- HH members
- Land (ha) inherited, rented, borrowed, etc.
- Animals
- Equipment
- Agricultural calendars (labor hours)
- Crops, production (yields GPS)
- Distribution of ag. products
- Income/expenditures
- Consumption patterns.
6Income and Expenditures
Sources of income Categories of
expenditure Ranking by importance
Responsible person Transaction period Actual
amounts
7Differences in Resource Endowment
8Cost-Benefit AnalysisFarmer-centered, ex-ante
Costs inputs, labor, land rent (forgone
production) Benefits increased yields, animals,
animal products, tree products
- Other possible costs and benefits
- Energy costs
- (fertilizer production)
- Measurements, monitoring
- Training
- Benefits to general society
- Data source
- Farmers
- Market study
- Reports
- Web
- Etc.
9Costs (Example Poor HH)
10Cost Description
11Benefits
12Benefits Description
13Calculations
- Undiscounted
- Total costs over time (25 years)
- Total benefits over time (25 years)
- Subtraction - Undiscounted Net Benefits
- Discounted
- Undiscounted Net Benefits
- Add discount rate
- Net Present Value (NPV) or Discounted Net Benefits
14Undiscounted Net Benefits(CFA ha-1)
15CalculateNet Benefits (Undiscounted), in
tC-11. C increase per ha
16CalculateNet Benefits (Undiscounted), in tC-1
2. Calculate per carbon increase
17Net Benefits (Undiscounted), in tC-1
18Discounted Benefits
Given a choice, individuals would prefer to have
a unit of benefits today rather than in the
future A unit next year is worth less than a
unit this year ? next years amounts must be
divided by (1i) to obtain the current or
present value, (NPV), to be comparable in
today-value terms With future benefits
discounted, both figures (todays investment
tomorrows benefit) are in present term value
and can be compared
19Example Discounting
1/(10.2)
1/(10.22)
1/(10.23)
20Net Present Values (NPV), in 20 Discount Rate
21Net Present Values (NPV), 20 Discount Rate
Indicates Profitability
NPV - Rich HH Costs Yr1 Rich HH NPV Medium
HH Costs Yr1 Medium HH NPV Poor HH Costs Yr1
Poor HH
Black circles negative NPV
22Sensitivity Analysis on CBA
- Test effect of changes in key parameters
- Different discount rate (10, 40)
- Different prices for inputs, labor, outputs
- Subsidies
23Net Present Values (NPV) with Subsidies20
Discount Rate
24HH Budgets and Decision-Making (STELLA Model)
25STELLA Example Millet Sector
26Model Validation Example Rich Household
27Model ValidationExample Poor Household
28Integrating C Management into HH Budgets
29Inventory of Management Choices
Poor HH
Rich HH