gender equality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

gender equality

Description:

... insidious legal techniques to disenfranchise aboriginal people from their homes. ... aboriginal peoples were again marginalized and disenfranchised. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: rainve
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: gender equality


1
gender equality social justice
  • Aboriginal Rights and the Colonial Canadian State

2
  • Processes of Decolonization Post WWII
  • Canada?
  • To be a canadian subject is to be defined, in
    large measure, by the cruelty and injustice of
    colonization?

3
Oh Canada
  • So, we produce ideas about canadianness at the
    level of identity, and we exist under Canadian
    law as subjects of the state. By participating
    both culturally and legally in canada we
    willingly and unwillingly participate in a
    racist, colonial past and present.
  • But isnt this a natural was of ordering people?
  • The idea of the nation, and of defining community
    based on shared nationality is a relatively new
    idea, one that didnt really emerge until the
    18th century!
  • Example King Louis 14th of France I am the
    state

4
Becoming Canada
  • Two major legal events mark the creation of the
    state of canada, around which we tell stories
    that become a part of canadian national
    identity.
  • The first moment is Confederation in 1867, which
    demarcated federal and provincial territories.
  • The Second is the repatriation of the
    constitution in 1982
  • The Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
  • From the outset, the British had to negotiate
    their desire for a colony, first, and nation,
    later, with the peoples that already lived on
    these lands.

5
The Indian Act
  • The Indian Act was the principal legal document
    that organizing this relationship between the
    native inhabitants of this land and the
    colonialists.
  • The Indian Act become official legislation in
    1876. It outlined the legal relationship between
    first nations people and the new Canadian
    government. They were organized into reserves and
    tribal bands, and were to be an administered
    people, ruled under the Minister of Indian
    Affairs and Northern Development. From the
    outset, this was a forced and contentious legal
    packaging of native peoples.

6
Whats in that Indian Act?
  • The Indian Act defines who is an "Indian" and the
    legal rights for registered Indians.
  • The Indian Act created the category of Indian,
    which meant that the Indian Act was principally
    about outlining who qualified for what. It was a
    buy off and one that employed some pretty
    insidious legal techniques to disenfranchise
    aboriginal people from their homes.
  • Three distinct groups are recognized Indians,
    Métis, and Inuit.
  • The Indian Act was imposed upon native peoples,
    and redefined their lives indefinitely.
  • The Indian Act homogenized aboriginal people.
  • Tribes that lived across US and Canadian borders
    were given right to cross borders but this is
    regularly challenged.
  • Nomadic peoples were forced into legally set
    boxes or reserves.
  • The Indian Act is war by legal document. Such
    documents are essential tools of colonial
    take-over and rule.
  • All rights, all notions of citizenship, humanity,
    family, community are framed by the colonizers
    culture/language/laws.

7
  • In 1982, with the repatriation of the
    constitution, the Indian Act recognized the 8
    major treaties that the First Nations signed. For
    many First Nations people, these treaties were
    problematic and they wanted to renegotiate them.
    But the Canadian government under Trudeau
    reaffirmed these 100 year old treaties that most
    First Nations people found to be problematic,
    treaties that were never fairly negotiated.
  • Nonetheless, Trudeau as part of the repatriation
    of the constitution, pushed through the inclusion
    of the treaties in the legislation.
  • So, as Canada gained a constitution, aboriginal
    peoples were again marginalized and
    disenfranchised.

8
BOTH/AND
  • So, when everyone voted yes to the constitution
    act, they also voted yes to re-inscribing and
    reaffirming these racist and problematic legal
    documents that shape life for First Nations
    people.
  • Colonizers gained rights and first nations moved
    father away from their efforts to gain rights.
  • Today, many tribes are disputing the reserve
    boundaries as they were assigned during treaty
    negotiations.

9
The Treaties
  • Major Treaties Between First Nations and
    Britain/Canada
  • signed after confederation.
  • (between 1871 1921) Some of these treaties are
    over 100 years old. Many contain language and
    structure that are racist and that natives
    themselves didnt understand because they didnt
    speak the language. Some treaties were negotiated
    by RCMP (rather than government), with people
    that werent necessarily representing native
    peoples in any kind of democratic way.
  • Challenging the treaties became as increasingly
    exhausting process after 1982 because now first
    nations are required to make constitutional
    amendments to change the treaties, and this is a
    very long and arduous process.
  • Thus, First Nations have huge legal barriers to
    overcome to update legal documents that they were
    coerced into up to 100 years ago.

10
In the Name of the Father
  • Even the concept of First Nation is built on a
    European Colonial notion of Nation that forces
    aboriginal peoples to frame their struggles in
    the legal language of the colonizer that sees
    lands as property for ownership, governed by a
    nation state.
  • Also notion of family key.
  • Prime Minister/Daddy
  • Patriarchal State/Family
  • Transformed gender relations among native people.

11
Sexism in the Indian Act
  • Prior to European Colonization of the Americas,
    many First Nations cultures were egalitarian, in
    terms of gender
  • though this differed from tribe to tribe
    remember, there was no nationalized idea of
    gender relations for indigenous tribes.
  • Missionaries and other Church officials
    discouraged matriarchal or egalitarian aspects of
    first Nation societies and encouraged the
    adoption of European norms of male dominance and
    control of women. Being civilized meant being
    patriarchal.
  • With the establishment of Canada in 1867,
    federal Indian Affairs policy reflected a
    patriarchal bias in many areas. For example,
    federal legislation from 1869 to 1985 imposed
    patriarchal rules for determining Indian status,
    band membership and rights to reserve residency.

12
Sexism in the Indian Act
  • colonization processes have taken their toll on
    all Aboriginal peoples but perhaps their greatest
    toll on women. Aboriginal women face the double
    discrimination of racism and sexism, which are
    fostered and perpetuated through statutory
    mechanisms such as the Indian Act.

13
Bill C-31 (Amendment to the Indian Act)
  • (usually referred to as) Bill C-31
  • The pre-legislation name of the 1985 Act to Amend
    the Indian Act. This act eliminated certain
    discriminatory provisions of the Indian Act,
    including the section that resulted in Indian
    women losing their Indian status and membership
    when they married Non-Status men. Bill C-31
    enabled people affected by the discriminatory
    provisions of the old Indian Act to apply to have
    their Indian status and membership restored.
  • Go to the document.

14
Nation and Gender
  • Nation states are formed through profoundly
    gendered ideologies.
  • Gender inequality can be changed at the level of
    the state legislation, but we continue to impose
    notions of citizenship, family, nationality that
    are racist, gendered, and classed.

15
Colonialism by Child-Welfare Policy
The Ultimate Betrayal
Claiming and Re-Claiming Cultural IdentityTamara
Kulusic
  • There are two key systemic practices of the
    Canadian state that have operated through certain
    understandings of family. These were aimed at
    assimilating aboriginal peoples into a national
    identity.
  • In truth, states are rarely interested in
    assimilating first nations people, but rather of
    killing their strength and self-identity slowly
    but brutally.
  • Residential Schools
  • The 60s Scoop

16
  • From the beginning of the colonial invasion until
    the 1970s, the government of canada attempted
    to force first nations societies to assimilate
    into the white, colonial, patriarchal nation
    state. p. 24
  • Education was key! a network of Church run
    residential schools was established in the mid
    1800s. 24 READ
  • In what has come to be known as the sixties
    scoop, thousands of Aboriginal children across
    Canada were removed from their communities in the
    1960s and placed in care of white parents through
    adoption and foster case programs. p. 23
  • In 1959 only one percent of children in
    government care were Native. By the end of the
    1960s, however, this had increased to thirty to
    forty percent of all children in care being
    Native. p. 25
  • What were the reasons for apprehending Aboriginal
    children?
  • What are some of the complications of these
    adoption practices as outlined by Kulusic?
  • Poem

17
Anna HunterFor and By Men Colony, Gender and
Aboriginal Self-Government
  • Aboriginal culture has been permanently changed
    and altered by processes of colonization that
    were deeply racist, and patriarchal. There is no
    going back.
  • For this reason, First Nations people must use a
    variety of tactics to try and regain the health
    of their communities after projects of genocide,
    and oppressive assimilation. There are many
    different ideas, different approaches, different
    positions, and different strategies for doing
    this.
  • First nations people are as diverse as any other
    group. There is no homogenous tribe, or
    homogenous group of indigenous people. They are
    forced to behave and think of themselves as one
    because of colonial nation-state ideology.
  • Under these conditions, the notion of Aboriginal
    self-government has developed in and through
    European patriarchal influence.
  • Hunter, in this piece, is arguing for a
    reconceptualization of Aboriginal that
    self-government that unites the theory of
    self-government with the practice. This means
    that the communities would be self-governed by
    all of its members, women and men.

18
Aboriginal Self-Government - SOVEREIGNTY
  • Aboriginal self-government includes the right to
    make economic and social policy, administer
    taxes, pass laws, manage land and natural
    resources and negotiate with other governments.
    It means giving Aboriginal people the right to
    heal their communities, and determine their
    destinies.
  • Aboriginal self-governmentpeople. p. 107
  • Why is self-government the way to approach
    aboriginal rights for Hunter?
  • How can this happen within a nation state model
    of Canada?
  • What are some of the challenges of
    self-government?
  • Why is gender-based analysis in Aboriginal
    relations so important?
  • Example Child Welfare policies How can
    implementing the mainstream models of child
    protection without tailoring the programs and
    policies to the particular needs of the community
    and its members be considered progressive?
    (110). What is Hunter speaking to here? Hint
    Internalized colonialism.

19
  • By now a picture of the formation of Canada as a
    nation-state with strong racist and sexist
    assumptions and policies emerges from the
    seemingly separate pieces of historyWe may thus
    come to see racism and sexism as the very
    foundations of Canadian nationalism. Roxanna Ng

20
Keepers of the FireChristine Welsh
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com