Title: Scott Bergen
1Counting Critters from Space
Monitoring Large Wildlife Directly through High
Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing
- Scott Bergen
- Eric Sanderson
- Pete Coppolillo (Tanzania)
- Joel Berger (USA)
- Claudio Campagna (Argentina)
2Proof of concept
- Can we use high spatial resolution to count
wildlife directly from space? - If so, what animals and under what circumstances?
- Measuring abundance (and species type)
- Utility of hyper-spatial imager for biodiversity
Wildlife Management
Mgmt. Goal
3Hyperspatial Satellites in Operation
Satellite Band Wavelength Resolution Nadir Resolution Off-Nadir Bit Depth Extent Return Nadir Return Off Nadir
(at 26 degrees)
Ikonos 2 B .45 - .52 3.2 m 4.0 m 11 13 x 13 km 144 days 3-5 days
G .51 - .60 3.2 m 4.0 m 11 11.3 X 11.3 km
R .63 - .70 3.2 m 4.0 m 11
IR .76 - .85 3.2 m 4.0 m 11
Panchromatic .45 - .90 0.82 m 1.0 m 11
(at 26 degrees)
Quickbird 2 B .45 - .52 2.4 m 2.88 m 11 16.5 x 16.5 km 11 days 3- 6 days
G .52 - .60 2.4 m 2.88 m 11 16.5 x 165 km
R .63 - .69 2.4 m 2.88 m 11
IR .76 - .89 2.4 m 2.88 m 11
Panchromatic .45 - .90 0.6 m 0.72 m 11
(at 30 degrees)
Orbview 3 B .45 - .52 4.0 m 5.2 m 11 8 x 8 km n/a lt 3 days
G .52 - .60 4.0 m 5.2 m 11
R .62 - .69 4.0 m 5.2 m 11
IR .76 - .90 4.0 m 5.2 m 11
Panchromatic .45 - .90 1.0 m 1.3 m 11
(at 25 degrees)
Worldview-1 Panchromatic na 0.5 m 0.59 m 11 17.4 x 110 km lt 4.6 days 4.6 days
41, Bronx Zoo Experiment
- An experiment that would quantify hyper-spatial
imagerys ability to identify wildlife in a
semi-natural environment - Test species and habitat characteristics
- Build a predictive model to guide and assess
potential field sites for further experiments
5Bronx Zoo Experimental Framework
- Two experiments
- Fake Fur Targets of known size and color
- White, Brown, Black
- Small (gazelle), Medium (buck deer), Large
(bison) - Animal targets animals in the Zoo
- 27 species in known enclosures
- Number of animals
- Position noted at time of acquisition
6Logit (identified) -3.666 0.019(Color)
0.970(Size) - 0.230(VegHt) - 0.421(Shade)
Note green, grassy background
7Hyperspatial Imagery is not for the Birds
8Information Shadow
9Shadow Information
10Important Initial Findings
- Some animals are too small to be identified
(resolution of imagery), even in aggregate - Vegatation and shade (cover) significantly
degrades detectability - Shadows cast by individual animals can amply
reflectance signature and provide important
additional information (height, shape)
112, Ruaha National Park, Tanzania
- Large wildlife species elephant, Cape buffalo,
giraffe, eland, etc. - Heterogenenous landscape with miombo forest,
shrublands, and grasslands - Initially tried to develop 3-d model using 2 sat.
images _at_ apposing Nadir angles - Opportunity to perfect ground survey collection
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
143, National Elk Refuge, Wyoming
15Techniques developed here allowed us to be able
to verify the location of over 1,500 individuals
within 10 seconds Allowed us to investigate how
individual animals sex, color, position relative
to sun angle affect reflectance spectra and
composition
16Adventures in Object Orientation
17Identifying Noise
18Deciphered Noise
19Counting Wildlife using hyperspatial imagery with
different methods
204, Peninsula Valdes, Argentina
21(No Transcript)
225, Dumb Luck
23(No Transcript)
24(No Transcript)
25Conclusions
- Can do Big contrasty animals in the open
- Caribou, Musk Ox, Bison, Elk, Seal/Sea Lion,
Wildebeest, Elephant on grass, etc. - Contextual and spectral clues enhance automated
classification - But old-fashioned manual interpretation faster
and cheaper, with comparable accuracy - Costs and accuracy equivalent to standard field
methods, for situations where suitable
26Solution Science
Today
Science to explain patterns
Remote Sensing Observations
Describe patterns on Earth
How?
Tomorrow
Remote Sensing Observations
Science to suggest desired patterns
Observed patterns verify we are on track
Less vulnerable, more resilient Provides societal
benefits
27Thank you
28(No Transcript)