Title: Death as Data: Autopsy and the Death Certificate
1Death as Data Autopsy and the Death Certificate
- Two basic goals
- value of the autopsy
- proper use of the death certificate
2Essential websites and URLS
National Association of Medical Examiners Death
Certificate Tutorials http//www.thename.org/Caus
eDeath/main.htm
A Canadian angle 1998 article from the
Canadian Medical Association Journal http//www.
cma.ca/cmaj/vol-158/issue-10/1317.htm
3Outline
- Autopsy history in three periods
- The fall of the autopsy 1960 onward
- Evidence of continuing relevance
- Some attempts to explain the problem
- Effects of falling rates
- An example of the effect
- Death certificate what it is, how it should be
approached
4The autopsy in history
- Classical period test authority
- Pre-modern period (17-18C) emphasis on anatomy
- Modern period 19C on
- Rokitansky (gross autopsy)
- Virchow (added the microscope)
- Osler a modern example
- Ultimate recognition as prime goal a contribution
to medical knowledge
5Falling Autopsy Rates
- From 50 in the 1960s to
- Much lower than 10 today, despite
- (for example) of three U.S. studies, an incorrect
diagnosis of malignant tumors was shown in - 36.5 of cases (1923)
- 41 of cases (1972)
- 44 of cases (1998, Louisiana)
6(No Transcript)
7Falling Autopsy Rates RVH 1998
8JAMA 1998 Louisiana study
- All autopsies 1986-95
- Outcome measure discordance in clinical vs.
autopsy for cancer - 1105 cases mean age 48 years (very atypical)
- 443 neoplasms at autopsy 250 malignant
- 111 wrong CLINICAL diagnoses of malignancy
including 57 which caused death
9So what is wrong? 1. Why do the rates keep
falling in the face of continuing evidence of
error?
- Increasing reliance on imaging
- Fear of lawsuits? May explain USA but not
elsewhere
10So what is wrong? 2. Changing patterns in
pathology
- Changing patterns in pathology and pathologists
- A new but worrying factor regard for autopsy
practices as violating civil rights (lawsuit in
UK over pediatric autopsies) reflects a constant
fight over values over the years coupled with
some abuses such as Burking
11So what is wrong? 3. Poor communication
- Suggestions of poor communication between
pathologists and clinicians - Wherever a special effort is made to educate
rates increase, although this may be transitory.
Rates can reach 100 in some centres!
12So what is wrong? 4.
- Suggestions of poor communication between
pathologists and clinicians - Poor pay, lack of curiosity, lack of professional
attitude to reporting can lead to vicious
circle of late reporting - Clinical mortality rounds seem to result in
higher rates when pathologists attend
13Is anything right?
- In academic centres cases with unknown cause
still invoke requests for autopsy - This means that almost every increasingly rare
autopsy has become more interesting both for
the pathologist, for teaching, and for
publication, BUT... - This applies only to academic centres
14Effects of falling rates
- Similar to effects of bad death certificate
reporting - National health statistics wrong
- Lack of Quality Control
- Problems for analytical epidemiology (garbage in,
garbage out)
15Autopsy trends and their effect on disease
ascertainment an example.
- 1. What is this lesion?
- 2. How rare is it?
- 3. Difficulties in Diagnosis
- 1. Result in UNCERTAINTY (or
guessing This could be X or possibly Y or) - 2. Result in outright error (mainly lung ca)
16Special Procedures in Pathology Trends for 228
women with mesothelioma 1970-90
- Trends among 142 and 98 female cases diagnosed
1970-1984 and 1985-1991, respectively.
17Effect of Autopsy Rate on Reliability and
Accuracy in Two Diagnostic Eras
18CMAJ ARTICLE
- 1. Improving the accuracy of death
certification -
- Eight case scenarios are presented
- Kathryn A. Myers, MD, EdM
- Donald R.E. Farquhar, MD, SM
- CMAJ 19981581317-23
19Ontario Death Certificate
202. WRITING CAUSE-OF-DEATH STATEMENTS
- An On-Line Tutorial
- http//www.thename.org/CauseDeath/main.htm
21Why learn this now?
- Often, a physician's first encounter with the
death certificate occurs upon the physician's
first patient death when he/she is handed the
death certificate form and asked to complete it. - This usually occurs during the first year of
residency. - Many, perhaps most, are not told how and
never learn!
22The cause-of- death statement contains two parts
Part I
- A)
- Due to, or as a result of
- B)
- Due to, or as a result of
- C)
-
PART I is designed so that a sequence of
conditions leading to death may be reported
23The cause-of- death statement contains two parts
Part II
- Part II. OTHER SIGNIFICANT CONDITIONS Conditions
contributing to death but not resulting in the
underlying cause of death in Part I -
EXAMPLES hypertension, diabetes, chronic
obstructive lung disease, renal diseasediseases
pre-existing or co-existing with the MAIN
UNDERLYING DISEASE but NOT related to it
24PART I ONE CONDITION per line, starting with
the most recent condition on the top line and
going backward in time
25An example
26Variants problems
- Single Line Part I Format (missing data) e.g. no
autopsy, patient dies at home, known to have
prostate carcinoma - uncertainty or presumption use probable
- ALWAYS REPORT CANCER!
- Can cheat on part two to record risk factor
(smoking, asbestos exposure)
27Additional Information on the Death Certificate
- Usually a space to record TIME since onset of
event - Always indicate whether (a) an autopsy has been
asked for and (b) whether the DC includes autopsy
information - In some places, can record occupation retired
is NOT an occupation!!! - Mandatory reporting violent death, certain
infections varies with state
28Multiple cause-of-death coding
- All data to date are based on a SINGLE cause of
death but - Modern national statistics programs record ALL
information on the death certificate and can
derive - multiple cause-of-death data
29http//www.thename.org/CauseDeath/main.htm (This
is the web address for the tutorial on death
certificates)