Death as Data: Autopsy and the Death Certificate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Death as Data: Autopsy and the Death Certificate

Description:

http://www.thename.org/CauseDeath/main.htm. A Canadian angle: 1998 article from the ... The fall of the autopsy: 1960 onward. Evidence of continuing relevance ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: bruce186
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Death as Data: Autopsy and the Death Certificate


1
Death as Data Autopsy and the Death Certificate
  • Two basic goals
  • value of the autopsy
  • proper use of the death certificate

2
Essential websites and URLS
  • Bruce.case_at_mcgill.ca

National Association of Medical Examiners Death
Certificate Tutorials http//www.thename.org/Caus
eDeath/main.htm
A Canadian angle 1998 article from the
Canadian Medical Association Journal http//www.
cma.ca/cmaj/vol-158/issue-10/1317.htm
3
Outline
  • Autopsy history in three periods
  • The fall of the autopsy 1960 onward
  • Evidence of continuing relevance
  • Some attempts to explain the problem
  • Effects of falling rates
  • An example of the effect
  • Death certificate what it is, how it should be
    approached

4
The autopsy in history
  • Classical period test authority
  • Pre-modern period (17-18C) emphasis on anatomy
  • Modern period 19C on
  • Rokitansky (gross autopsy)
  • Virchow (added the microscope)
  • Osler a modern example
  • Ultimate recognition as prime goal a contribution
    to medical knowledge

5
Falling Autopsy Rates
  • From 50 in the 1960s to
  • Much lower than 10 today, despite
  • (for example) of three U.S. studies, an incorrect
    diagnosis of malignant tumors was shown in
  • 36.5 of cases (1923)
  • 41 of cases (1972)
  • 44 of cases (1998, Louisiana)

6
(No Transcript)
7
Falling Autopsy Rates RVH 1998
8
JAMA 1998 Louisiana study
  • All autopsies 1986-95
  • Outcome measure discordance in clinical vs.
    autopsy for cancer
  • 1105 cases mean age 48 years (very atypical)
  • 443 neoplasms at autopsy 250 malignant
  • 111 wrong CLINICAL diagnoses of malignancy
    including 57 which caused death

9
So what is wrong? 1. Why do the rates keep
falling in the face of continuing evidence of
error?
  • Increasing reliance on imaging
  • Fear of lawsuits? May explain USA but not
    elsewhere

10
So what is wrong? 2. Changing patterns in
pathology
  • Changing patterns in pathology and pathologists
  • A new but worrying factor regard for autopsy
    practices as violating civil rights (lawsuit in
    UK over pediatric autopsies) reflects a constant
    fight over values over the years coupled with
    some abuses such as Burking

11
So what is wrong? 3. Poor communication
  • Suggestions of poor communication between
    pathologists and clinicians
  • Wherever a special effort is made to educate
    rates increase, although this may be transitory.
    Rates can reach 100 in some centres!

12
So what is wrong? 4.
  • Suggestions of poor communication between
    pathologists and clinicians
  • Poor pay, lack of curiosity, lack of professional
    attitude to reporting can lead to vicious
    circle of late reporting
  • Clinical mortality rounds seem to result in
    higher rates when pathologists attend

13
Is anything right?
  • In academic centres cases with unknown cause
    still invoke requests for autopsy
  • This means that almost every increasingly rare
    autopsy has become more interesting both for
    the pathologist, for teaching, and for
    publication, BUT...
  • This applies only to academic centres

14
Effects of falling rates
  • Similar to effects of bad death certificate
    reporting
  • National health statistics wrong
  • Lack of Quality Control
  • Problems for analytical epidemiology (garbage in,
    garbage out)

15
Autopsy trends and their effect on disease
ascertainment an example.
  • 1. What is this lesion?
  • 2. How rare is it?
  • 3. Difficulties in Diagnosis
  • 1. Result in UNCERTAINTY (or
    guessing This could be X or possibly Y or)
  • 2. Result in outright error (mainly lung ca)

16
Special Procedures in Pathology Trends for 228
women with mesothelioma 1970-90
  • Trends among 142 and 98 female cases diagnosed
    1970-1984 and 1985-1991, respectively.

17
Effect of Autopsy Rate on Reliability and
Accuracy in Two Diagnostic Eras
18
CMAJ ARTICLE
  • 1. Improving the accuracy of death
    certification
  • Eight case scenarios are presented
  • Kathryn A. Myers, MD, EdM
  • Donald R.E. Farquhar, MD, SM
  • CMAJ 19981581317-23

19
Ontario Death Certificate
20
2. WRITING CAUSE-OF-DEATH STATEMENTS
  • An On-Line Tutorial
  • http//www.thename.org/CauseDeath/main.htm

21
Why learn this now?
  • Often, a physician's first encounter with the
    death certificate occurs upon the physician's
    first patient death when he/she is handed the
    death certificate form and asked to complete it.
  • This usually occurs during the first year of
    residency.
  • Many, perhaps most, are not told how and
    never learn!

22
The cause-of- death statement contains two parts
Part I
  • A)
  • Due to, or as a result of
  • B)
  • Due to, or as a result of
  • C)

PART I is designed so that a sequence of
conditions leading to death may be reported
23
The cause-of- death statement contains two parts
Part II
  • Part II. OTHER SIGNIFICANT CONDITIONS Conditions
    contributing to death but not resulting in the
    underlying cause of death in Part I

EXAMPLES hypertension, diabetes, chronic
obstructive lung disease, renal diseasediseases
pre-existing or co-existing with the MAIN
UNDERLYING DISEASE but NOT related to it
24
PART I ONE CONDITION per line, starting with
the most recent condition on the top line and
going backward in time
25
An example
26
Variants problems
  • Single Line Part I Format (missing data) e.g. no
    autopsy, patient dies at home, known to have
    prostate carcinoma
  • uncertainty or presumption use probable
  • ALWAYS REPORT CANCER!
  • Can cheat on part two to record risk factor
    (smoking, asbestos exposure)

27
Additional Information on the Death Certificate
  • Usually a space to record TIME since onset of
    event
  • Always indicate whether (a) an autopsy has been
    asked for and (b) whether the DC includes autopsy
    information
  • In some places, can record occupation retired
    is NOT an occupation!!!
  • Mandatory reporting violent death, certain
    infections varies with state

28
Multiple cause-of-death coding
  • All data to date are based on a SINGLE cause of
    death but
  • Modern national statistics programs record ALL
    information on the death certificate and can
    derive
  • multiple cause-of-death data

29
http//www.thename.org/CauseDeath/main.htm (This
is the web address for the tutorial on death
certificates)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com