Public Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

Public Meeting

Description:

Projected enrolment data and other planning information. Tours of each school ... Extending boundaries negatively impacts enrolment at review schools possibly ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: ryanw86
Category:
Tags: enrol | meeting | public

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public Meeting


1
Public Meeting 3
Accommodation Review Committee
  • June 10, 2009

2
Streetsville Accommodation Review
  • Dianne Miles
  • Superintendent of Education
  • Streetsville Accommodation Review Committee
  • Chair

3
Agenda
  • Welcome Introduction of ARC Members Dianne
    Miles, Superintendent of Education
  • Chair of the Streetsville ARC
  • 2. Review of School Consolidation Process and
    Timelines ARC members


  • Jeff White, PDSB Trustee


  • Wards 6 11
  • Feedback from Public to date Dianne Miles
  • Presentation of Scenarios Ellen Warling, Senior
    Planner

  • ARC members
  • 5. Public Input ARC Members/Community
    Members
  • 6. Public Questions Dianne Miles
  • 7. Next Steps Dianne Miles

4
Who are we ?
  • To allow all of us to get a sense of our
    attendees tonight we want to ask for your
    participation in a little exercise.
  • Please stand if you answer yes to the question
  • I have a student in the Peel DSB
  • I am a community member with no students
    currently attending a PDSB school.
  • My child(ren) attend(s)
  • Russell Langmaid
  • Ray Underhill
  • Willow Way
  • Vista Heights
  • Edenrose

5
Who are we ?
  • This is my first Public Meeting on the
    Streetsville accommodation review.

6
Purpose of Public Meeting 3
  • To review the accommodation review process with
    the community
  • To share the short list of possible accommodation
    scenarios developed by the ARC
  • To invite parents and residents in the
    Streetsville community to provide feedback on the
    short list of suggested scenarios

7
Streetsville Accommodation ReviewCommittee(ARC)
  • Committee Members

8
Accommodation Review Committee
  • Streetsville ARC Members
  • School Council Chairs
  • Parent Representatives
  • Principals
  • Municipal representation
  • Community/Business representation
  • Planning Department staff

9
Mandate of the Accommodation Review Committee
  • The mandate of the Streetsville ARC
  • is to develop options for student accommodation
    that will maximize student learning within the
    resources available to the Peel District School
    Board.

10
Our Shared Vision
  • The school we value for the ideal accommodation
    for students provides
  • A safe, nurturing and inclusive environment
  • Academic social physical character
    education
  • Up-to-date technology and resources in classrooms
  • Extra-curricular activities (a wide variety to
    appeal to all teacher involvement commitment)
  • Community involvement

11
Accommodation Review Committee's Work To Date
  • Accomplishments to date (as of June 10th)
  • Six committee meetings to date and 2 public
    meetings held
  • Collaborative team building and open dialogue
  • Common understanding of reaching consensus
  • Vision for ideal school accommodation
  • Gathering knowledge to make an informed
    decision
  • Beginning to narrow down possible accommodation
    options
  • Sharing information with school councils and
    receiving input from school councils

12
Streetsville Accommodation Review
  • Jeff White
  • PDSB Trustee, Wards 6 11

13
Streetsville ARC
  • PDSB guides any decisions about the review and
    potential consolidation of existing schools
  • Decisions are made with the involvement of the
    community and based on the learning needs of
    students
  • PDSB policy and procedures comply with the
    Ministry of Education guidelines

14
Consolidation Stages
  • Identification (Stage I) (Ministry Framework)
  • Annual Planning Document identifies "trigger
    schools" (schools under 60 capacity listed)
  • Annual Planning Document identifies review area
    to be considered for review and analysis
    (Streetsville Review Area)
  • Review Analysis (Stage II) (Ministry Framework)
  • Accommodation Review Committee (ARC) formed
  • Solutions generated for community
  • Presentation of Report (Stage III) (Ministry
    Framework)
  • Recommendations submitted to Controller of
    Planning and Accommodation Support Services
  • ARC report along with staff report sent to
    Physical Planning Building (P.P. B.) and
    Board for final decision
  • Implementation (Stage IV) (Board Operating
    Procedure)
  • Advisory Committee formed

15
Timelines
16
Four Public Meetings
  • Community input is an important part of the
    accommodation review process.
  • Feedback from Public to date.

17
Community Feedback
  • Summary
  • French Immersion
  • Capacity at Vista Heights
  • Future trends and enrolment in 15 years
  • Future program needs i.e. full day Kindergarten
  • Siblings in different schools
  • Communication everyone has a voice
  • Timing
  • Keep students together to attend the same middle
    school and
  • secondary school

18
Overview of School Consolidation Process
  • Ellen Warling
  • Senior Planner
  • Planning and Enrolment
  • Peel District School Board

19
Review Area

20
Changes to Review Area2004-2008
  • Ray Underhill PS 2004 added all students
    south of HWY 401 who were attending Meadowvale
    Village PS
  • Willow Way PS 2005 and 2007 added students east
    of Creditview Road
  • Vista Heights PS 2004 FI boundary change with
    Plum Tree Park PS (directed students west of 10th
    line to Plum Tree Park) 2008 opened new FI site
    at Britannia PS all students north of Britannia
    Road now directed to Britannia PS for FI

21
Existing School Boundaries
22
Census Data
23
Decision Making
  • VALUATION FRAMEWORK
  • Value to the Student (55)
  • Value to the PDSB (25)
  • Value to the Community (10)
  • Value to the Economy (10)

24
Value to the Student
  • Quality of the learning environment
  • Student outcomes
  • Range of courses and/or programs offered
  • Range of extracurricular activities
  • Adequacy of school physical space to support
    learning
  • Adequacy of school grounds for healthy physical
    activity and extracurricular activities
  • Accessibility for students with disabilities
  • Safety of the school
  • Proximity of the school to students/length of bus
    ride to school

25
Value to PDSB
  • Student outcomes at the school
  • Range of program or course offered
  • Availability of specialized teaching spaces
  • Condition and location of school
  • Value of the school if it is the only school
    within the community
  • Fiscal and operational factors (i.e. enrolment
    versus available space, cost to operate the
    school, cost of transportation, availability of
    surplus space in adjacent schools, cost to
    upgrade the facility so that it can meet student
    learning objectives)

26
Value to the Community
  • Facility for community use
  • Range of programs offered at the school that
    serve both students and community members (i.e.
    adult ESL programs)
  • School grounds as green spaces and/or available
    for recreational use
  • School as a partner in other government
    initiatives in the community
  • Value of the school - is it the only school
    within the community

27
Value to the Local Economy
  • School as a local employer
  • Availability of cooperative education
  • Availability of training opportunities or
    partnerships with business
  • Attracts or retains families in the community
  • Value of the school if it is the only school
    within the community

28
Presentation of Scenarios
  • ARC Members

29
The work of the Accommodation Review Committee
continues
  • The Arc has developed possible scenarios and
    narrowed the options using information gathered
    from
  • School Valuation Frameworks
  • Projected enrolment data and other planning
    information
  • Tours of each school in the review area
  • Input from the School Councils and Public
    Meeting 1 2
  • Our shared vision guided the possibilities!

30
Reaching Consensus
  • Common goal
  • Discuss
  • Ask questions
  • Review direction
  • Reflective
  • Clarify
  • Paraphrase

31
Using Consensus
  • Initially 14 options
  • Using the valuation frameworks, demographic
    information, shared vision, mandate and input
    from school councils
  • Narrowed it down to 5 scenarios
  • Using the valuation frameworks, demographic
    information, shared vision, mandate and input
    from school councils and public meetings
  • Identified 3 scenarios plus a modification to the
    3rd scenario

32
Overview of Scenarios
  • The scenarios being shared tonight do not include
    retaining Russell Langmaid as a school
  • Rationale
  • Value to student is most important
  • Student success drives our decision making
  • Opportunities to socialize with peers
  • Cost to upgrade Russell Langmaid
  • Extending boundaries negatively impacts
    enrolment at review schools possibly striking
    another ARC

33
Scenario 1
34
Scenario 2
35
Scenario 3
36
Scenario 3
Russell Langmaid closes students directed to
Ray Underhill and Edenrose
37
Scenario 4
38
Scenario 4
39
Scenario 5
40
  • Scenario 5a

41
Scenario 5
42
Public Input
  • The Streetsville ARC would like your input.
  • Group work at tables
  • review each of the scenarios
  • provide pros and cons for each of the scenarios
  • Your ranking of each scenario
  • you will be given a form for you to rank the
    scenarios after the discussions

43
Group Norms
  • Make sure all voices are heard
  • Respect each other
  • Be reflective using the information available
  • Use time effectively

44
Wrap-Up
  • What did we hear at the table discussions?
  • Please fill out your sheet ranking the scenarios
    and hand it in before you leave this evening

45
Community Questions
  • Please approach the microphone provided
  • State your name
  • Proceed with your question

46
Accommodation Review Committee Process - Next
Steps
  • Using the feedback from this public meeting the
    ARC will develop its final recommendation

47
Next Public Meeting of the Accommodation Review
Committee
  • Public Meeting 4
  • Wednesday, October 7, 2009
  • ARC presents proposed recommendation (s) going
    forward to the PDSB

48
Stage III
  • Streetsville ARC Report is submitted to
    Controller Wright on October 16th, 2009
  • ARC Report and Staff Report are presented to
    Physical Planning and Building Committee on
    January 5th, 2010.

49
Stage III Continued
  • PDSB considers both reports on January 12th,
    2010. A final decision will be made at this
    regular Board meeting.
  • The final decision belongs to the Board of
    Trustees, not the ARC or board staff
  • Implementation of the Board's decision begins
    (Stage IV)

50
Communication
  • Website http//www.peelschools.org
  • School newsletters and letters to parents
  • Flyers to homeowners and businesses
  • Newspaper

51
Next Meeting
  • Public Meeting 4
  • Wednesday October 7th
  • 7 p.m.
  • Streetsville SS
  • (final recommendation)

52
The End
  • Thank you for your participation

53
Middle School Boundaries
54
Bussing Distances
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com