Title: Public Meeting
1Public Meeting 3
Accommodation Review Committee
2Streetsville Accommodation Review
- Dianne Miles
- Superintendent of Education
- Streetsville Accommodation Review Committee
- Chair
3Agenda
- Welcome Introduction of ARC Members Dianne
Miles, Superintendent of Education - Chair of the Streetsville ARC
-
- 2. Review of School Consolidation Process and
Timelines ARC members -
Jeff White, PDSB Trustee -
Wards 6 11 - Feedback from Public to date Dianne Miles
-
- Presentation of Scenarios Ellen Warling, Senior
Planner -
ARC members - 5. Public Input ARC Members/Community
Members - 6. Public Questions Dianne Miles
- 7. Next Steps Dianne Miles
4Who are we ?
- To allow all of us to get a sense of our
attendees tonight we want to ask for your
participation in a little exercise. -
- Please stand if you answer yes to the question
- I have a student in the Peel DSB
- I am a community member with no students
currently attending a PDSB school. - My child(ren) attend(s)
- Russell Langmaid
- Ray Underhill
- Willow Way
- Vista Heights
- Edenrose
5Who are we ?
-
- This is my first Public Meeting on the
Streetsville accommodation review.
6Purpose of Public Meeting 3
- To review the accommodation review process with
the community - To share the short list of possible accommodation
scenarios developed by the ARC - To invite parents and residents in the
Streetsville community to provide feedback on the
short list of suggested scenarios
7Streetsville Accommodation ReviewCommittee(ARC)
8Accommodation Review Committee
- Streetsville ARC Members
- School Council Chairs
- Parent Representatives
- Principals
- Municipal representation
- Community/Business representation
- Planning Department staff
9Mandate of the Accommodation Review Committee
- The mandate of the Streetsville ARC
- is to develop options for student accommodation
that will maximize student learning within the
resources available to the Peel District School
Board.
10Our Shared Vision
- The school we value for the ideal accommodation
for students provides - A safe, nurturing and inclusive environment
- Academic social physical character
education - Up-to-date technology and resources in classrooms
- Extra-curricular activities (a wide variety to
appeal to all teacher involvement commitment) - Community involvement
11Accommodation Review Committee's Work To Date
- Accomplishments to date (as of June 10th)
- Six committee meetings to date and 2 public
meetings held - Collaborative team building and open dialogue
- Common understanding of reaching consensus
- Vision for ideal school accommodation
- Gathering knowledge to make an informed
decision - Beginning to narrow down possible accommodation
options - Sharing information with school councils and
receiving input from school councils
12Streetsville Accommodation Review
- Jeff White
- PDSB Trustee, Wards 6 11
13Streetsville ARC
- PDSB guides any decisions about the review and
potential consolidation of existing schools - Decisions are made with the involvement of the
community and based on the learning needs of
students - PDSB policy and procedures comply with the
Ministry of Education guidelines
14Consolidation Stages
- Identification (Stage I) (Ministry Framework)
- Annual Planning Document identifies "trigger
schools" (schools under 60 capacity listed) - Annual Planning Document identifies review area
to be considered for review and analysis
(Streetsville Review Area) - Review Analysis (Stage II) (Ministry Framework)
- Accommodation Review Committee (ARC) formed
- Solutions generated for community
- Presentation of Report (Stage III) (Ministry
Framework) - Recommendations submitted to Controller of
Planning and Accommodation Support Services - ARC report along with staff report sent to
Physical Planning Building (P.P. B.) and
Board for final decision - Implementation (Stage IV) (Board Operating
Procedure) - Advisory Committee formed
15Timelines
16Four Public Meetings
- Community input is an important part of the
accommodation review process. - Feedback from Public to date.
17Community Feedback
- Summary
- French Immersion
- Capacity at Vista Heights
- Future trends and enrolment in 15 years
- Future program needs i.e. full day Kindergarten
- Siblings in different schools
- Communication everyone has a voice
- Timing
- Keep students together to attend the same middle
school and - secondary school
18Overview of School Consolidation Process
- Ellen Warling
- Senior Planner
- Planning and Enrolment
- Peel District School Board
19Review Area
20Changes to Review Area2004-2008
- Ray Underhill PS 2004 added all students
south of HWY 401 who were attending Meadowvale
Village PS - Willow Way PS 2005 and 2007 added students east
of Creditview Road - Vista Heights PS 2004 FI boundary change with
Plum Tree Park PS (directed students west of 10th
line to Plum Tree Park) 2008 opened new FI site
at Britannia PS all students north of Britannia
Road now directed to Britannia PS for FI
21Existing School Boundaries
22Census Data
23Decision Making
- VALUATION FRAMEWORK
- Value to the Student (55)
- Value to the PDSB (25)
- Value to the Community (10)
- Value to the Economy (10)
24Value to the Student
- Quality of the learning environment
- Student outcomes
- Range of courses and/or programs offered
- Range of extracurricular activities
- Adequacy of school physical space to support
learning - Adequacy of school grounds for healthy physical
activity and extracurricular activities - Accessibility for students with disabilities
- Safety of the school
- Proximity of the school to students/length of bus
ride to school
25Value to PDSB
- Student outcomes at the school
- Range of program or course offered
- Availability of specialized teaching spaces
- Condition and location of school
- Value of the school if it is the only school
within the community - Fiscal and operational factors (i.e. enrolment
versus available space, cost to operate the
school, cost of transportation, availability of
surplus space in adjacent schools, cost to
upgrade the facility so that it can meet student
learning objectives)
26Value to the Community
- Facility for community use
- Range of programs offered at the school that
serve both students and community members (i.e.
adult ESL programs) - School grounds as green spaces and/or available
for recreational use - School as a partner in other government
initiatives in the community - Value of the school - is it the only school
within the community
27Value to the Local Economy
- School as a local employer
- Availability of cooperative education
- Availability of training opportunities or
partnerships with business - Attracts or retains families in the community
- Value of the school if it is the only school
within the community
28Presentation of Scenarios
29The work of the Accommodation Review Committee
continues
- The Arc has developed possible scenarios and
narrowed the options using information gathered
from - School Valuation Frameworks
- Projected enrolment data and other planning
information - Tours of each school in the review area
- Input from the School Councils and Public
Meeting 1 2 - Our shared vision guided the possibilities!
30Reaching Consensus
- Common goal
- Discuss
- Ask questions
- Review direction
- Reflective
- Clarify
- Paraphrase
31Using Consensus
- Initially 14 options
- Using the valuation frameworks, demographic
information, shared vision, mandate and input
from school councils - Narrowed it down to 5 scenarios
- Using the valuation frameworks, demographic
information, shared vision, mandate and input
from school councils and public meetings - Identified 3 scenarios plus a modification to the
3rd scenario
32Overview of Scenarios
- The scenarios being shared tonight do not include
retaining Russell Langmaid as a school - Rationale
- Value to student is most important
- Student success drives our decision making
- Opportunities to socialize with peers
- Cost to upgrade Russell Langmaid
- Extending boundaries negatively impacts
enrolment at review schools possibly striking
another ARC
33Scenario 1
34Scenario 2
35Scenario 3
36Scenario 3
Russell Langmaid closes students directed to
Ray Underhill and Edenrose
37Scenario 4
38Scenario 4
39Scenario 5
40 41Scenario 5
42Public Input
- The Streetsville ARC would like your input.
- Group work at tables
- review each of the scenarios
- provide pros and cons for each of the scenarios
- Your ranking of each scenario
- you will be given a form for you to rank the
scenarios after the discussions
43Group Norms
- Make sure all voices are heard
- Respect each other
- Be reflective using the information available
- Use time effectively
44Wrap-Up
- What did we hear at the table discussions?
- Please fill out your sheet ranking the scenarios
and hand it in before you leave this evening
45Community Questions
- Please approach the microphone provided
- State your name
- Proceed with your question
46Accommodation Review Committee Process - Next
Steps
- Using the feedback from this public meeting the
ARC will develop its final recommendation
47Next Public Meeting of the Accommodation Review
Committee
- Public Meeting 4
- Wednesday, October 7, 2009
- ARC presents proposed recommendation (s) going
forward to the PDSB
48Stage III
- Streetsville ARC Report is submitted to
Controller Wright on October 16th, 2009 - ARC Report and Staff Report are presented to
Physical Planning and Building Committee on
January 5th, 2010.
49Stage III Continued
- PDSB considers both reports on January 12th,
2010. A final decision will be made at this
regular Board meeting. - The final decision belongs to the Board of
Trustees, not the ARC or board staff - Implementation of the Board's decision begins
(Stage IV)
50Communication
- Website http//www.peelschools.org
- School newsletters and letters to parents
- Flyers to homeowners and businesses
- Newspaper
51Next Meeting
- Public Meeting 4
- Wednesday October 7th
- 7 p.m.
- Streetsville SS
- (final recommendation)
52The End
- Thank you for your participation
53Middle School Boundaries
54Bussing Distances