Reforma Tribut - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Reforma Tribut

Description:

Brazilian experience: an interesting case study. International comparison ... presence at the birth of most sectors, regulation questions, federative issues ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: fernando59
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reforma Tribut


1
Brazilian (Low) Public Investment
  • ______________________________
  • José Roberto R. Afonso,
  • Geraldo Biasoto e Ana Carolina Freire
  • CEPAL, 31/01/2007
  • 19ª Seminário Regional Política Fiscal

2
Index
  • Brazilian experience an interesting case study
  • International comparison
  • Evolution of investment in Brazil
  • Reflections
  • Different types of investment projects
  • Alternatives

3
The Brazillian problem low growth
4
Brazilian Experience an Interesting Case Study
  • One of the highest tax burden of the world (about
    40 of GDP in 2006)
  • All fiscal targets set by the IMF have been
    systematically met
  • Nevertheless, the public sectors debt pile
    continues fairly high compared to that of
    similarly sized emerging economies (about 49 of
    GDP)

5
Brazilian Experience an Interesting Case Study
  • In the new century, the public sector has been
    registering a historic low in investment, even
    lower than the average levels seen elsewhere in
    Latin America
  • An increasing, and already the major part of
    expenditure on capital formation by public sector
    authorities, has become decentralized
  • Consequence a low in public investment in
    infraestructures.

6
Low public investment international comparison
See Afonso, Schuknecth e Tanzi, (2003) e (2006).
7
Low public investment international comparison
8
Low public investment international comparison
9
National Investment Tax of GDP
10
Real Investment Rate - Gross Fixed Capital
Formation as percent of GDP 1995/2003(at
constant prices)
11
Public Sector Borrowing Requirement 1995/2003
12
Public Administration Borrowing Requirement
1995/2003
13
Public Administration in Gross Fixed Capital
Formation (1901-2003) Low during the last
fifteen years
14
Decentralization of Public Administration Gross
Fixed Capital Formation (1947/2003)
15
Public Administration Low in the Share of
National Capital Stock (1950/2003)
16
Low in Public Sector Gross Fixed Capital
Formation in Infraestructure (estimated)
1995/2003 (as percent of GDP at constant prices)
17
Public Sector Gross Fixed Capital Formation in
Infrastructure (estimated) 1995/2003As percent
of Total GFCF
18
Public Sector Gross Fixed Capital Formation in
Infrastructure 1995/2003
19
Reflections
  • Management of fiscal crises
  • Fiscal adjustments combining strong tax burden
    increases and intense low in public investments
  • Restrictions to public debt for all purposes
    (capital os current expenses)
  • Privatization restricted to some sectors

20
Reflections
  • The management with foreign capital flows needs a
    government intervention that implies in fiscal
    costs to Treasury
  • The efforts to decrease the internal debt-GDP are
    sterilized by the level of interest rate
  • Demand restricted by tax and low real expenses
    (high level of interest payments)
  • Private investment decisions against low public
    investment in infrastructure

21
Reflections
  • The adjustment shape lead us to a trap its
    impossible to enlarge the public investment tax
    with out a decrease in primary surplus or a new
    fiscal configuration
  • The relation between the public and the private
    sectors in Brazil are complex there are not easy
    solutions
  • The Brazilian case is hard to compare to other
    international experiences state presence at the
    birth of most sectors, regulation questions,
    federative issues

22
Opening a Fiscal Space to the Investment in
Infrastructure
  • Brazil the public financing profile is still a
    problem.
  • Inefficiency of government efforts on
    partnerships (PPP) or project exclusions from
    fiscal targets (PPI)
  • Need to carry on profitable projects and those
    with positive externalities

23
The questions
  • How increase public investment with out
    deterioration in private expectations on public
    deficit?
  • Is there a manner to increase the allocation
    efficiency instead a high level of public
    investment?

24

Different types of investment projects
  • Three types could be treated differently
  • The 1st type would be the project with an
    adequate internal rate of return, as compared to
    the placement of notes in the market
  • The 2nd type would be that which has, in its
    initial stages, an internal rate of return
    inferior to the cost of raising funds in the
    market, but that IIR reaches a normal rate during
    the operation period
  • The 3rd type would be that project which really
    could not be expected to provide an internal rate
    of return demanded by the market over the course
    of its lifetime, but there are positive
    externalities (in social or economic sense)

25
Different types of investment projects
  • In all cases private management and resources
    borrowed from market (specific bonds for each
    project)
  • In 2nd and 3rd cases the gap against the IRR
    would be consider a disbursement the Treasury
    would response by the equalization (accounting
    like deficit)
  • The deviation of projects from the parameters
    initially drawn up would be treated specifically
    increase deficit, annually added to PSBR

26
Different types of investment projects
  • Enforcement on the administration by goals
  • More transparency in fundamental projects
  • Examination by financial market
  • Credibility in public accounting measures
  • Rebuild the public debt in other foundation

27
Different types of investment projects
  • One is not looking to merely mobilize resources
    for investment - the idea is also to develop
    actions that are managerially efficient and
    worthy of financing for the market
  • The differential should not however be given by
    the governmental structure but rather by the
    market
  • The financing of such projects should involve
    specific resources, raised directly from the
    market

28
Alternatives
  • a) division line in the balance sheets current x
    investments
  • b) OECD proposals to deduce investment
    expenditures related to capital depreciation
  • c) anti-ciclical fiscal policy
  • monitoring exceeding resources destined to public
    investment.
  • Risk of a anti-cyclical fiscal policy lack of
    public investments during the cycles ascension
    can not be on to the responsibility of the
    private sector.
  • d) separating public spending between public
    enterprises and public administration

29
Alternatives
  • Exclusion of public enterprises from the PSBR and
    NPSD
  • PSBR and NPSD concepts
  • Revenue earmarking for investments
  • Tax treatment of capital goods.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com