Title: Anterior preperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty
1Anterior pre-peritoneal inguinal hernioplasty
??????????????
- ??? ??????
- Yih-Huei Uen, MDDivision of General Surgery,
Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Foundation Medical
Center, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.
2Design(I)
- Modified device /technique of PHS
- An improved method for deploying the
polypropylene underlay patch of the PROLEN Hernia
System - American Surgeon 2007 May, Yih-Huei Uen
- ??????
3Fig. 1 The procedures of development of a
modified device of PHS.
4Fig. 2 The procedures of intra-pocket
manipulation
5Table 1. Results
6(No Transcript)
7Comparative Laparoscopic Evaluation of the
Original versus Modified Design of PROLENE
Hernia System in A Porcine-groin Hernia-Repair
Model
Study(II)
8Material and Method
- 30 uncastracted male pig (average BW 24Kg)
- Unilateral anterior inguinal hernioplasty
- Group
- Original PHS(n10)
- Modified PHS with onlay fixation (n10)
- Modified PHS without onlay fixation (n10)
9Handassisted laparoscopic stress-loading test
using dynamometer
10(No Transcript)
11Result (I) The laparoscopy of the
preperitoneally positioned mesh prosthesis
12Result (II) Comparsion of the results of
stress-loading test
23.99 0.89
Bursting strength
10.57 0.46
10.20 1.11
lb
Plt0.01 Group2 vs Group1 and 3 Pgt0.05 Group1 vs
Group 3
13Discussion ( I ) Special design and unique
technique of Modified PHS
- Harboring a deploying underlay pocket graft
with a pressure reception perimeter - Fixating underlay graft to the fascial edge
- Using a narrow angled metal pusher to perform
intra-pocket manipulation
14Discussion ( II )Potential advantage of
Modified PHS prosthesis
- Full deployment of underlay graft against the
inner surface of the inguinal floor to cover
entire MPO (Pascals principle) - Secure obliteration of fascial defect
- Increased stability of devices
- Self assessment of the adequacy of deployment
15(No Transcript)
16Discussion ( III )
- The fixation stitches of onlay patch
traditionally used in Original PHS can be
substituted by those of fascial edge in
Modifieddevice if it is strong enough. - Can post-operative pain be decreased?
17Discussion ( IV )
- Hand-assisted laparoscopic stress-loading test
with dynamometer - Firstly used in assessment of the stability of
hernia repair prothesis - An useful tool good exposure, mimic nature
hernia protrusion, easy manipulation and high
accuracy
18Conclusion
- Groin hernia repair with Modified PHS device/
technique is a simple and effective way to
achieve full deployment of underlay graft along
pelvic anatomy with increased stability.
19Design(II)
- Underlay pocket graft ( enough! )
- Type I PROLENE mesh
- Type II ULTRAPRO (partially absorbable) mesh
20- Underlay pocket graft with ULTRAPRO (partially
absorbable) mesh
21Study(III)
- Randomized comparison of the clinical result of
pre-peritoneal hernioplasty with PROLENE vs
ULTRAPRO mesh underlay pocket graft
22Table 1. Results
23Discussion
- Although long-term follow-up is needed, the early
result of pre-peritoneal hernioplasty using
ULTRAPRO mesh is as efficient as PROLENE
analogue.
24Summary
- Underlay pocket graft, either along use or
combined in PHS device, can facilitate the result
of pre-peritoneal hernioplasty. Its role in
inguinal hernioplasty will be high- lightened by
the usage of ULTRAPRO mesh.
25Reference
- 1. Gilbert AI, Graham MF, Voigt WJ. A bilayer
patch device for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia
19993161-166. - 2. Uen YH. Comparison laparoscopic evaluation of
the PROLENE hernia system and the Perfix
plug-and-patch device in a porcine groin hernia
repair model. Journal of Laparoscopic Advanced
Surgical Technique 200414(6)363-373. - 3. Murphy JW. Use of the prolene hernia system
for inguinal hernia repair retrospective,
comparative time analysis versus other inguinal
hernia repair systems. American Surgeon
200167(10)919-923. - 4. Uen YH. An improved method for deploying the
polypropylene underlay patch of the PROLEN Hernia
System American surgeon 2007 May
26 Thanks for your attention !
27(No Transcript)