Title: Red alder Establishment: Achieving Success the First Time
1Red alder Establishment Achieving Success the
First Time
- By Chris Rasor
- Reforestation Coordinator
- Department of Natural Resources
- Pacific Cascade Region
2Objective Achieve Success the 1st Time!
- Step 1 Selecting a suitable growing site
- Step 2 Site preparation
- Step 3 Seedling selection and care
- Step 4 Planting execution
- Step 5 1st year plantation monitoring
3Site Selection Criteria
- Red alder grows almost anywhere Well-drained
gravelly flood plains to poorly drained clay
soils, BUT productivity is only optimal on the
ideal sites. Proper site selection is
prerequisite to success. - Key Physical Site Characteristics2
- Topography
- Low elevation lt 1000 (Summarizes length of
growing season and temperature) - Slopes lt20 (allows for ground-based harvesting)
- Aspect Key sheltered from drying winds , storm
winds - North or NE best, South worst, West aspects risk
wind exposure - Effects of aspect greatly reduced when slopes
lt10 - Soils
- Well drained, good rooting depth gt30 inches
- Deep loam, silt loam, clay loam (high water
holding capacity)
4Site Selection Using Plant Associations
- Use Ground Vegetation Clues
- Salal too dry/nutrient poor
- Sword fern moist, nutrient rich
- If in doubt, verify your plant association
- Recommended plant association guide for SW WA
- http//www.reo.gov/ecoshare/Publications/documents
/FPAOlympicNF.pdf (start on page 104) - Exclude areas of dominant salal from planting if
possible
Silver Springs Unit 3 Future red alder site
Optimal sword fern cover (POMU)
5Site Selection
Resources
- A Method of Site Quality Evaluation for Red
Alder by C.A. Harrington, 1986.
http//www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/5556 - Red Alder Plantation Establishment Site
Selection, Site Preparation, Planting Stock, and
Regeneration by A. Dobkowski, 2006.
http//www.fs.fed.us/pnw/publications/gtr669/ - DNR Red Alder Index Model ARCGIS Tool
- Geographic representation of alder suitability
using criteria primarily from Harringtons
publication
6Site Selection
DNR red alder index GIS model DARK GREEN SI20
est. _at_ 70 feet MEDIUM GREEN MODERATE
(66) LIGHT GREEN LOW POTENTIAL (60) PINK NO
POTENTIAL (SI20 lt60 feet)
Alder_index NO POTENTIAL Elevation
0-1000 Aspect North-East Slope
5-20 Position Plain Soil_type
LOW Soil_depth gt 30 inches Site_index HIGH
7Site Selection
Height 18 ft.
- 3-year old plantation on a medium quality site
- (estimated SI20 65)
Yr 3
Yr 2
Yr 1
Shakers U1 Site estimate SI20 65 feet
8Site Selection
6-year-old plantation on a poor site (est.SI20
lt60 ft.) Note salal cover
9Ranges of Site Productivity
DNR Red alder Site Quality Rating Height _at_ Age 20 (SI20)1
Marginal 55-60
Moderate 61-65
Good 66-70
Excellent 70
- Site index based on natural stands from Hardwood
Silviculture Coop (HSC) Installations - Height gains through plantation forestry may be 6
feet or more at age 20 based on initial HSC
installation data
10Site Selection Watch Outs
Frost pockets
11Frost Pocket Screening
- Cold air settling Any depressions on flat (lt5)
topography - Macro cold-air drainage Draws or valleys
connecting areas of high to low elevation that
drain large masses of cold air - Cold-air damming Lower portions of units where
cold air backs-up behind vegetative barriers such
as riparian areas, or topographical obstructions
such as ridges
12Frost Pocket Examples
13Frost Damage Illustration
- Freeze damage prior to lifting at the nursery,
noticed in the field!
- Frost kill in field (year 1)
14Step 2 Site Preparation
- GOALS OF SITE PREPARATION
- Create plantable spots
- Control competing vegetation
15Mechanical Site Preparation
16Chemical Site Preparation
17Managing for Problems
Managing for Max Growth
Managing for Survival
Reference 4
18Herbicides aid early density, vegetation control
of pile burn spots
19Controlling Competing VegetationGoal lt 20
cover 1st growing season
- August 7th, 1st growing season
Shakers Unit 1 1st Year Competing Vegetation
20Herbicide Options
- Site Preparation
- Foliar herbicides
- Glyphosate (Accord)
- Soil residual herbicides
- Atrazine (Atrazine 90 WDG)
- Metsulfuron (Escort XP)
- Potential future tools
- Flumioxazin (SureGuard)
- Release
- Ground glyposate directed application (low
effectiveness, high cost) - Aerial atrazine treatment dormant application
- SureGuard herbicide may become a tool for early
release
21Chemical Site Preparation
- Most effective site preparation tank mixes
- Accord (glyphosate) Atrazine 90 WDG (atrazine)
- Pros atrazine provides superior herbaceous
control - Cons atrazine Restricted Use Pesticide (RUP),
higher risk of groundwater leaching, more
difficult to apply - Accord (glyphosate) Escort XP (metsulfuron)
- Pros Escort easier to apply due to small use
rates, low risk of groundwater leaching - Cons inferior herbaceous weed control (grass,
senecio) - Make sure to follow all label precautions and
worker protection standards when using herbicides
22Chemical Site Preparation
- Accord (72-128 oz) Escort (1-2 oz)/ac
January prior to 2nd growing season
June 2nd growing season
23Senecio Sylvaticus September 1st Growing Season
May Senecio germinant
24Example of poor vegetation control
- Grass, senecio, thistle not controlled by fall
site prep using Accord Escort on Shakers U1.
Growth substantially reduced where total
vegetation cover gt 20
25Step 3 Seedling Selection Care
- 10 (left) vs. P1/2 (right)
- Styro 2 plugs ready for transplant
26Seedling Selection
- Target Seedling Characteristics
- 1-year bare-root seedlings P½ (Webster) or 10
(Weyerhaeuser) - Sturdy, well-branched seedling buds all along
the main stem - Seedling height 24-48 inches
- Largest caliper possible (gt 8mm, min. 6mm )
Caliper is key! - Dense , healthy root system with Frankia nodules
- Minimal large diameter woody roots
27Seedling Selection Stem caliper dictates
initial growth potential
28Stem Caliper vs. 1st Year Height
29Predicting 1st Year Height Growth Using Seedling
Caliper
- 1st Year growth of target seedling
- Predicting 1st Year Height
y .3117x 2.3186 y .3117x 2.3186
x (caliper) mm y (ht) ft.
4 3.6
5 3.9
6 4.2
7 4.5
8 4.8
9 5.1
10 5.4
11 5.7
12 6.1
30Seedling Care Handling
- Nursery Procedures (verify with nursery)
- Freezer store from early January
- Thawed upon request 3-5 days before pick-up
- Communicate your expectations to growers/nursery
managers - Nursery to Cold Storage
- Keep in cold storage during long transports to
cooler if possible - Store at 33-38 degrees F no more than 1-2 weeks
following thawing - Cold Storage to Planting Site
- Do not stack bags greater than 3 bags deep
without support - Transport under insulated tarp or canopy
eliminating direct sun exposure, drying of fine
roots - Only remove qty from cold storage that can be
planted that day
31Step 4 Planting Execution
- Handling At the Planting Site
- Paint trees with white or orange paint to
facilitate visibility for spacing, planting
compliance - Eliminate planters from overloading planting bags
(scrapes off side buds during loading, unloading) - Minimize planters grabbing seedlings from tips
(brittle tips snap off easily) - Do not let planters boots contact stem (thin
bark damages easily)
32Planting Specifications
- Timing
- Plant mid-March to mid-April (after risk of
damaging frosts) - Planting Spot Characteristics (define in
contract) - Plant in mineral soil avoiding close proximity to
stumps or slash piles (risks damage from
reflective heat or mechanical abrasion) - Do not plant where obstructions intersect an
imaginary 1 foot cylinder around seedling - Avoid excess scalping (minimizes reflective heat
around stem) - Depth settled groundline 1 inch above root
collar - Stocking Levels
- Target 540 tpa (9x9) to 680 (8 x 8) well
spaced
33Results of Poor Planting
- Shallow planted tree wind-rocked out of planting
hole in year 2
- Mechanical abrasion caused by slash pile edges
34Step 5 1st Year Monitoring
35GOALS OF 1ST YEAR MONITORING
- Trigger Necessary Silviculture Activities
- Actual total vegetation cover mid-July
- Herbicide release? (yes if gt40 in yr 1)
- Actual total live stocking at end of 1st Year
- Actual cause of significant mortality?
- Interplant? (yes if lt 480-500 live crop trees)
- Actual versus target height
- Why was target achieved or not?
36Questions?Chris.Rasor_at_dnr.wa.gov
37References
- Harrington, C.A. Curtis, R.O., 1985. Height
growth and site index curves for red alder. Res.
Pap. PNW-358. Portland, OR U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest
Research Station, 14 p. - C.A. Harrington, 1986. A Method of Site Quality
Evaluation for Red Alder. http//www.treesearch.fs
.fed.us/pubs/5556 - A. Dobkowski., 2006. Red Alder Plantation
Establishment Site Selection, Site Preparation,
Planting Stock, and Regeneration.
http//www.fs.fed.us/pnw/publications/gtr669/ - R. Wagner, 2000. Competition and critical-period
thresholds for vegetation management decisions in
young conifer stands. November/December Vol. 76,
No. 6, The Forestry Chronicle. - G.R. Ahrens A. Dobkowski D.E. Hibbs, 1992. Red
alder Guidelines for Successful Regeneration.
Special Publication 24. Forest Research
Laboratory, Oregon State University.