Red alder Establishment: Achieving Success the First Time - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Red alder Establishment: Achieving Success the First Time

Description:

Red alder Establishment: Achieving Success the First Time – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: admm
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Red alder Establishment: Achieving Success the First Time


1
Red alder Establishment Achieving Success the
First Time
  • By Chris Rasor
  • Reforestation Coordinator
  • Department of Natural Resources
  • Pacific Cascade Region

2
Objective Achieve Success the 1st Time!
  • Step 1 Selecting a suitable growing site
  • Step 2 Site preparation
  • Step 3 Seedling selection and care
  • Step 4 Planting execution
  • Step 5 1st year plantation monitoring

3
Site Selection Criteria
  • Red alder grows almost anywhere Well-drained
    gravelly flood plains to poorly drained clay
    soils, BUT productivity is only optimal on the
    ideal sites. Proper site selection is
    prerequisite to success.
  • Key Physical Site Characteristics2
  • Topography
  • Low elevation lt 1000 (Summarizes length of
    growing season and temperature)
  • Slopes lt20 (allows for ground-based harvesting)
  • Aspect Key sheltered from drying winds , storm
    winds
  • North or NE best, South worst, West aspects risk
    wind exposure
  • Effects of aspect greatly reduced when slopes
    lt10
  • Soils
  • Well drained, good rooting depth gt30 inches
  • Deep loam, silt loam, clay loam (high water
    holding capacity)

4
Site Selection Using Plant Associations
  • Use Ground Vegetation Clues
  • Salal too dry/nutrient poor
  • Sword fern moist, nutrient rich
  • If in doubt, verify your plant association
  • Recommended plant association guide for SW WA
  • http//www.reo.gov/ecoshare/Publications/documents
    /FPAOlympicNF.pdf (start on page 104)
  • Exclude areas of dominant salal from planting if
    possible

Silver Springs Unit 3 Future red alder site
Optimal sword fern cover (POMU)
5
Site Selection
Resources
  • A Method of Site Quality Evaluation for Red
    Alder by C.A. Harrington, 1986.
    http//www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/5556
  • Red Alder Plantation Establishment Site
    Selection, Site Preparation, Planting Stock, and
    Regeneration by A. Dobkowski, 2006.
    http//www.fs.fed.us/pnw/publications/gtr669/
  • DNR Red Alder Index Model ARCGIS Tool
  • Geographic representation of alder suitability
    using criteria primarily from Harringtons
    publication

6
Site Selection
DNR red alder index GIS model DARK GREEN SI20
est. _at_ 70 feet MEDIUM GREEN MODERATE
(66) LIGHT GREEN LOW POTENTIAL (60) PINK NO
POTENTIAL (SI20 lt60 feet)
Alder_index NO POTENTIAL Elevation
0-1000 Aspect North-East Slope
5-20 Position Plain Soil_type
LOW Soil_depth gt 30 inches Site_index HIGH
7
Site Selection
Height 18 ft.
  • 3-year old plantation on a medium quality site
  • (estimated SI20 65)

Yr 3
Yr 2
Yr 1
Shakers U1 Site estimate SI20 65 feet
8
Site Selection
6-year-old plantation on a poor site (est.SI20
lt60 ft.) Note salal cover
9
Ranges of Site Productivity
DNR Red alder Site Quality Rating Height _at_ Age 20 (SI20)1
Marginal 55-60
Moderate 61-65
Good 66-70
Excellent 70
  • Site index based on natural stands from Hardwood
    Silviculture Coop (HSC) Installations
  • Height gains through plantation forestry may be 6
    feet or more at age 20 based on initial HSC
    installation data

10
Site Selection Watch Outs
Frost pockets
11
Frost Pocket Screening
  • Cold air settling Any depressions on flat (lt5)
    topography
  • Macro cold-air drainage Draws or valleys
    connecting areas of high to low elevation that
    drain large masses of cold air
  • Cold-air damming Lower portions of units where
    cold air backs-up behind vegetative barriers such
    as riparian areas, or topographical obstructions
    such as ridges

12
Frost Pocket Examples
13
Frost Damage Illustration
  • Freeze damage prior to lifting at the nursery,
    noticed in the field!
  • Frost kill in field (year 1)

14
Step 2 Site Preparation
  • GOALS OF SITE PREPARATION
  • Create plantable spots
  • Control competing vegetation

15
Mechanical Site Preparation
16
Chemical Site Preparation
17
Managing for Problems
Managing for Max Growth
Managing for Survival
Reference 4
18
Herbicides aid early density, vegetation control
of pile burn spots
19
Controlling Competing VegetationGoal lt 20
cover 1st growing season
  • December before planting
  • August 7th, 1st growing season

Shakers Unit 1 1st Year Competing Vegetation
20
Herbicide Options
  • Site Preparation
  • Foliar herbicides
  • Glyphosate (Accord)
  • Soil residual herbicides
  • Atrazine (Atrazine 90 WDG)
  • Metsulfuron (Escort XP)
  • Potential future tools
  • Flumioxazin (SureGuard)
  • Release
  • Ground glyposate directed application (low
    effectiveness, high cost)
  • Aerial atrazine treatment dormant application
  • SureGuard herbicide may become a tool for early
    release

21
Chemical Site Preparation
  • Most effective site preparation tank mixes
  • Accord (glyphosate) Atrazine 90 WDG (atrazine)
  • Pros atrazine provides superior herbaceous
    control
  • Cons atrazine Restricted Use Pesticide (RUP),
    higher risk of groundwater leaching, more
    difficult to apply
  • Accord (glyphosate) Escort XP (metsulfuron)
  • Pros Escort easier to apply due to small use
    rates, low risk of groundwater leaching
  • Cons inferior herbaceous weed control (grass,
    senecio)
  • Make sure to follow all label precautions and
    worker protection standards when using herbicides

22
Chemical Site Preparation
  • Accord (72-128 oz) Escort (1-2 oz)/ac

January prior to 2nd growing season
June 2nd growing season
23
Senecio Sylvaticus September 1st Growing Season
May Senecio germinant
24
Example of poor vegetation control
  • Grass, senecio, thistle not controlled by fall
    site prep using Accord Escort on Shakers U1.
    Growth substantially reduced where total
    vegetation cover gt 20

25
Step 3 Seedling Selection Care
  • 10 (left) vs. P1/2 (right)
  • Styro 2 plugs ready for transplant

26
Seedling Selection
  • Target Seedling Characteristics
  1. 1-year bare-root seedlings P½ (Webster) or 10
    (Weyerhaeuser)
  2. Sturdy, well-branched seedling buds all along
    the main stem
  3. Seedling height 24-48 inches
  4. Largest caliper possible (gt 8mm, min. 6mm )
    Caliper is key!
  5. Dense , healthy root system with Frankia nodules
  6. Minimal large diameter woody roots

27
Seedling Selection Stem caliper dictates
initial growth potential
  • July 31 gt10mm caliper
  • July 31 lt8mm caliper

28
Stem Caliper vs. 1st Year Height
29
Predicting 1st Year Height Growth Using Seedling
Caliper
  • 1st Year growth of target seedling
  • Predicting 1st Year Height

y .3117x 2.3186 y .3117x 2.3186
x (caliper) mm y (ht) ft.
4 3.6
5 3.9
6 4.2
7 4.5
8 4.8
9 5.1
10 5.4
11 5.7
12 6.1
30
Seedling Care Handling
  • Nursery Procedures (verify with nursery)
  • Freezer store from early January
  • Thawed upon request 3-5 days before pick-up
  • Communicate your expectations to growers/nursery
    managers
  • Nursery to Cold Storage
  • Keep in cold storage during long transports to
    cooler if possible
  • Store at 33-38 degrees F no more than 1-2 weeks
    following thawing
  • Cold Storage to Planting Site
  • Do not stack bags greater than 3 bags deep
    without support
  • Transport under insulated tarp or canopy
    eliminating direct sun exposure, drying of fine
    roots
  • Only remove qty from cold storage that can be
    planted that day

31
Step 4 Planting Execution
  • Handling At the Planting Site
  • Paint trees with white or orange paint to
    facilitate visibility for spacing, planting
    compliance
  • Eliminate planters from overloading planting bags
    (scrapes off side buds during loading, unloading)
  • Minimize planters grabbing seedlings from tips
    (brittle tips snap off easily)
  • Do not let planters boots contact stem (thin
    bark damages easily)

32
Planting Specifications
  • Timing
  • Plant mid-March to mid-April (after risk of
    damaging frosts)
  • Planting Spot Characteristics (define in
    contract)
  • Plant in mineral soil avoiding close proximity to
    stumps or slash piles (risks damage from
    reflective heat or mechanical abrasion)
  • Do not plant where obstructions intersect an
    imaginary 1 foot cylinder around seedling
  • Avoid excess scalping (minimizes reflective heat
    around stem)
  • Depth settled groundline 1 inch above root
    collar
  • Stocking Levels
  • Target 540 tpa (9x9) to 680 (8 x 8) well
    spaced

33
Results of Poor Planting
  • Shallow planted tree wind-rocked out of planting
    hole in year 2
  • Mechanical abrasion caused by slash pile edges

34
Step 5 1st Year Monitoring
35
GOALS OF 1ST YEAR MONITORING
  • Trigger Necessary Silviculture Activities
  • Actual total vegetation cover mid-July
  • Herbicide release? (yes if gt40 in yr 1)
  • Actual total live stocking at end of 1st Year
  • Actual cause of significant mortality?
  • Interplant? (yes if lt 480-500 live crop trees)
  • Actual versus target height
  • Why was target achieved or not?

36
Questions?Chris.Rasor_at_dnr.wa.gov
37
References
  • Harrington, C.A. Curtis, R.O., 1985. Height
    growth and site index curves for red alder. Res.
    Pap. PNW-358. Portland, OR U.S. Department of
    Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest
    Research Station, 14 p.
  • C.A. Harrington, 1986. A Method of Site Quality
    Evaluation for Red Alder. http//www.treesearch.fs
    .fed.us/pubs/5556
  • A. Dobkowski., 2006. Red Alder Plantation
    Establishment Site Selection, Site Preparation,
    Planting Stock, and Regeneration.
    http//www.fs.fed.us/pnw/publications/gtr669/
  • R. Wagner, 2000. Competition and critical-period
    thresholds for vegetation management decisions in
    young conifer stands. November/December Vol. 76,
    No. 6, The Forestry Chronicle.
  • G.R. Ahrens A. Dobkowski D.E. Hibbs, 1992. Red
    alder Guidelines for Successful Regeneration.
    Special Publication 24. Forest Research
    Laboratory, Oregon State University.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com