Title: Kathryn Pearson Assistant Professor Department of Political Science
1Election 2008 What Happened, What to
Expect
Kathryn Pearson
Assistant Professor Department of
Political Science
22008 Electoral College Map
Source http//www.nytimes.com/
32004 Electoral College Map
Source http//www.nytimes.com/
4Red to Blue States
- Florida (27 Electoral Votes)
- Ohio (20)
- Virginia (13)
- Iowa (7)
- Colorado (9)
- New Mexico (5)
- Nevada (5)
- Indiana (11)
- North Carolina (15)
- 9 states switched from 04-08
52008 by County
Source http//www.nytimes.com/
6The Presidential Vote
- 2008 Electoral College Vote
- 364-162
- (MO and 1 EC vote in NE undecided)
- 2008 Popular Vote
- Obama 53 - McCain 46
- (In 2004, President Bush had a 2.4 margin)
7Election Turnout
From http//elections.gmu.edu/voter_turnout.htm
2004 60.3 turnout 2008 62.5 turnout projected
(133.3 million votes)
8The Results Contextual Factors
- State of the Nation
- Economic Conditions War
- 75 think the country is going in the wrong
direction - 85 are worried about economic conditions
- Presidential Approval
- Historically unpopular President hurt McCain
- Partisan Identification of the Electorate
- 9 of 10 partisans voted for party candidate
- Party Identification advantages Democrats
- 39(D) - 32(R) 29(I)
9The Results Campaign Effects and Short Term
Forces
- Candidates Persona and Policy
- Fundraising
- Obama is the first general election candidate to
reject public funding (84 million grant) - Campaign Organization
- Message, Unity, GOTV
- Battleground States Expanded
- Vice Presidential Selection
- 60 said Palin was not qualified to be President
if necessary, 16 of whom voted for McCain
10National Exit Polls 2008
11National Exit Polls 2004
12Issues --gt
lt-- Race
13U.S. Senate
14U.S. Senate
- Larger Democratic majority
- From 51 to 57 or more Democrats
- Fewer moderate GOP Senators
- A record 17 women
- 3 outcomes still not determined
- Alaska (leaning Republican)
- Georgia (runoff likely)
- Minnesota (recount)
15Polls Minnesota Senate
16Minnesota Senate Race
- Split Ticket Voting
- Obama wins 54 of state vote, McCain 44
- 74 of Obama supporters vote Franken
- 81 of McCain supporters vote Coleman
- Dean Barkley wins 15
-
- Incumbency Advantages for Coleman
- Record Spending (50 million)
- Negative Advertising Helps Barkley
- 60 think both attacked unfairly, 23 of those
voted for Barkley
17U.S. House
18U.S. House
- Democrats gain around 20 seats
- Democrats gained 30 seats in 2006
- First time since the 1930s Democrats make big
gains 2 cycles in a row - Regional divide
- No House Republicans in New England remain
- Minnesota delegations partisanship unchanged
- Bachmann wins in the 6th
- Paulsen wins in the 3rd
19Meaning of Elections
- Policy Mandates?
- Assumes knowledgeable citizens
- Assumes clear and differing candidate positions
- I earned capital in this campaign, political
capital, and I intend to spend it - (President George W. Bush, 2 days after
reelection in 04) - Judgments of Performance?
- Retrospective Voting
- The Economy, War and Peace
20Challenges and Opportunities for President Obama
- Extraordinary Economic Challenges
- Require Quick and Skilled Action
- Fulfilling Campaign Promises Will be Challenging
- Foreign Policy and Energy Challenges
- Unified Democratic Control
- Easier to move White House Priorities
- High Expectations
- Senate Filibuster
- Requires working with Republicans
- Fewer moderates in the Senate
- Cross-Pressured Democrats
21Challenges and Opportunities for President Obama
- Unified Party Government
- No guarantee of success
- Democrats margins similar to 1993
- Learning from Clintons failures in 1993-1994
- Health care stalls, Democrats lose Congress in
1994 elections - But the political context differs from 1993-1994
- Obamas margin and coattails more significant
than Clintons - Party leaders are stronger today
22Congressional Parties are Stronger and More
Polarized
- Both parties have become more ideologically
cohesive over the last 30 years - Political changes in the South
- No longer a one party system
- Southern conservatives are now Republicans
instead of conservative Democrats - Institutional changes have given party leaders
more power over committee chairs - More safe, partisan districts
- Close margins fierce policy and electoral
competition
23(No Transcript)
242008 by County
Source http//www.nytimes.com/