Mikko Laukkanen - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

Mikko Laukkanen

Description:

Limitations of the mobile device (both hardware and software) ... Executor agents to run the composed services. 11/23/09. 23. Possible application areas ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: teli2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mikko Laukkanen


1
Agents on Mobile Devices
  • Mikko Laukkanen
  • Mikko.Laukkanen_at_teliasonera.com

2
General introduction
  • The agents are on their way to mobile devices
  • Points to be considered
  • Limitations of the mobile device (both hardware
    and software)
  • The (nomadic) environment (wireless networks, new
    parameters, such as context awareness)
  • Application areas
  • Nomadic environments stimulate application areas
    for agents residing on the mobile device

3
About this presentation
  • Five main parts or perspectives
  • Nomadic environments
  • Characteristics, challenges
  • Mobile devices
  • Characteristics, operating systems, programming
    environments
  • Agents and agent platforms in nomadic
    environments
  • Challenges, use cases
  • Examples of agent platforms and agent systems
  • MicroFIPA-OS, JADE-LEAP, CASCOM platform
  • Standardization work on the area

4
  • Nomadic Environments

5
From stationary environments...
6
... To nomadic environments...
7
... And peer-to-peer (ad-hoc) environments
8
Where are we today...
  • Mobile devices used in nomadic environments are
    still quite limited
  • Only a few access networks available
  • Only a few services available (especially aimed
    to be used in nomadic environments)
  • Many things are done by hand...

9
...And what will (or should?) the future be like?
  • Many different mobile devices
  • Varying capabilities in terms of resolution,
    screen size, input methods, processing power,
    connectivity (this is already happening)
  • Smart phones, PDAs, tablet computers, laptops,
    desktops,
  • Multiple (overlapping) access networks
  • GSM, HSCSD, GPRS, EDGE, UTMS, Bluetooth, WLAN,
    ... (this is also already happening)
  • High number of services available for nomadic
    users
  • Services and the availability of services will
    depend on the state of the environment
  • More parameters affecting the availability of the
    just-on-time services than in the stationary
    environments
  • QoS of the data communication, positioning, time,
    user interests,

10
Challenges in the nomadic environments
  • Nomadic environments enable new ways to access
    services ? anywhere, at any time, and using any
    device
  • Challenges that need to be addressed
  • Varying QoS of the wireless networks
  • Limitations of mobile devices
  • Contextual variability (location, time, user
    preferences, ...)
  • Adaptivity in the nomadic environment is the key
    issue!

11
  • Mobile Devices

12
What are actually mobile devices?
  • Pocket-sized, network connectivity, and API for
    programming
  • Current battle in mobile device market
  • Microsoft (Windows Mobile) against others
    (Symbian OS, Linux)...
  • PDA devices will include mobile phone
    capabilities...
  • Mobile phones will include PDA-like
    capabilities...
  • ? PDAPhone?
  • Mobile devices for agents?
  • Personal devices
  • Wearable devices
  • Embedded and consumer devices

13
Limitations of the mobile devices
  • Essential limitations
  • Computing power
  • Amount of memory and storage space
  • Connectivity
  • Battery life
  • Other limitations
  • Screen size and resolution
  • Input/output
  • The fact is that although the capabilities of the
    mobile devices increase, the resource gap
    between mobile and stationary devices will always
    be there

14
Mobile device categorization
ProgrammingLanguage
ProgrammingEnvironment
Operating System
C
J
PocketPC
MS .NET
Java
Palm OS
J2ME
C/C
J2SE
Symbian OS
Native
Linux
15
Java 2 standard and micro edition
16
Microsoft .NET compact framework
Visual Studio.NET
.NET Framework
code
web pages
ASP.NET
.NET CompactFramework
17
Symbian OS
  • J2ME Midlets and C native applications
  • Examples

Nokia
Ericsson Series 40
Series 60 Series 80 UIQ
6290 6680
9500 P990i
18
Palm OS
  • J2ME Midlets
  • Examples

Palm m515 Handspring Treo
Kyocera
19
Linux
  • J2SE, J2ME, native applications
  • Examples

HP iPAQ Sharp Zaurus
20
PocketPC (Windows Mobile)
  • Microsoft Windows-powered devices
  • .NET Compact Framework available on PocketPC and
    PocketPC Phone Edition

PocketPC PocketPC Phone Edition
Smartphone
21
  • Agents and Agent Platforms in Nomadic
    Environments and Mobile Devices

22
Why agents in mobile devices and nomadic
environments?
  • Agents offer several features that could help
    solving the problems faced in the nomadic
    environments
  • Reactivity
  • Proactivity
  • Coordination
  • Autonomy
  • Service discovery, service composition, and
    (automatic) service execution
  • Semantic service descriptions for agents to
    consume
  • Directory services for agents to discover
    services
  • Planning agents for composing services from the
    available ones
  • Executor agents to run the composed services

23
Possible application areas
  • Traditional agent application may not be wise to
    port on to handheld devices
  • Agents in nomadic environments
  • Agents could be used in making both end-users
    and applications life easier?
  • Controlling network connections, enabling
    adaptation, ?
  • Agents in ad-hoc networking and service access
  • In ad-hoc environment handheld devices may have
    to cope on their own!

24
Example 1 personal user agent
  • Runs on users mobile device and helps user for
    instance by
  • Monitoring the environment and informing about
    interesting things
  • Filtering out irrelevant information from the
    environment
  • Organizing information, such as email messages
    and calendar appointments
  • Collaborating with other users User Agents
  • Proactively preparing things for the user while
    the device is connected to the network

25
Example 2 peer-to-peer (ad-hoc) environments
  • In ad-hoc environment we cannot rely on static
    information about services!
  • Agents in ad-hoc environment have to dynamically
    find each other and the (currently) available
    services
  • Example scenario finding the quickest way to the
    destination in a foreign place
  • The street network is not known
  • No Internet access available
  • Only ad-hoc networking possible
  • Fortunately there are other agents available
    providing help...

26
Example 3 multiagent system as an adaptive
middleware?
  • Agents on the mobile device (or in the wireless
    network elements) and in the fixed network
    collaborate to be able to know the network
    quality of service of the wireless network
  • Software agent methodology provides attractive
    features
  • Reactivity sense changes in wireless network
    parameters
  • Autonomous decide what needs to be done and how
  • Pro-activeness act (in advance) if needed
  • Co-operation ask for help from other agents or
    help other agents, if needed
  • Based on the QoS information the agents control
    the content adaptation process

27
Reality check....
  • Using software agents is one way of doing this,
    not necessarely the best in terms of
    performance...
  • ...But the issue is if the software agents as a
    methodology provides better tools for the
    development of this kind of middleware!

28
  • Example Agent Platforms

29
MicroFIPA-OS agent platform
  • Scaled-down version of FIPA-OS agent platform
  • Lightweight
  • Complies with the API of FIPA-OS
  • Targeted at medium to high-end mobile devices
    capable of running PersonalJava or J2SE
  • FIPA-compliant HTTP and proprietary socket based
    communication
  • Can be built as self-contained platform or as a
    part of another platform
  • Developed by University of Helsinki within
    CRUMPET project
  • Open-source

30
Supported devices
  • Target device is Compaq iPAQ H3630, but
  • it runs on Java-enabled devices such as
  • Cassiopeia E115
  • Psion Series 5
  • and many other devices
  • MicroFIPA-OS is PersonalJava compatible
  • PersonalJava is supported in the J2ME with the
    Personal profile

31
MicroFIPA-OS partial mode
  • Agent platform on the mobile device may be either
    complete or a part of another platform

Fixed network
Wireless network
Mobile device
Server-side
Terminal Agents
Service Agents
MicroFIPA-OS Agent Platform
FIPA-OS Agent Platform
FIPA-compliant transport
FIPA-compliant transport
32
MicroFIPA-OS partial mode
  • Agent platform on the mobile device may be either
    complete or a part of another platform

Fixed network
Wireless network
Mobile device
Server-side
Terminal Agents
Service Agents
MicroFIPA-OS Agent Platform
FIPA-OS Agent Platform
FIPA-compliant transport
FIPA-compliant Transport
Mobile device
Terminal Agents
Server-side
Service Agents
Fixed network part
FIPA-OS Agent Platform
MicroFIPA-OS Agent Platform
FIPA-OS Agent Platform
Internal transport
FIPA-compliant transport
Internal transport
FIPA-compliant transport
33
JADE-LEAP agent platform
  • Extension to JADE (special container within JADE)
  • Target devices
  • Java MIDP-capable phones
  • PDA devices
  • Smallest available platform in terms of footprint
    size
  • Proprietary device-initiated and socket based
    communication channel with main container
  • Developed within LEAP project
  • Open-source

34
CASCOM agent platform
  • Based on JADE/LEAP, but modified to meet the
    requirements of peer-to-peer environments
  • Split containers replaced by full standalone
    agent platforms suitable for mobile devices -gt
    MIDP Stand-alone version of JADE/LEAP

JADE/LEAP split container model
CASCOM model
35
CASCOM agent platform
  • HTTP as transport protocol
  • Based on JADEs HTTP implementation
  • Changes needed for MIDP implementation
  • Bit-efficient message envelope
  • Based on existing implementation
  • Bit-efficient ACL
  • Based on existing implementation

36
Which one to choose then...?
  • Experience with JADE ? choose JADE-LEAP
  • Experience with FIPA-OS ? choose MicroFIPA-OS
  • No experience with either ? choose JADE-LEAP
    (IMHO)
  • Depends on the target device and target
    environment
  • If Java-phones are to be supported, JADE-LEAP is
    the only option
  • If peer-to-peer environments are to be supported,
    CASCOM platform is the only option
  • JADE-LEAP has largest community behind it and is
    perhaps most actively developed
  • CASCOM platform is currently being developed,
    first prototypes are ready (yet not in public)

37
  • Example Agent Systems and Projects

38
The CRUMPET project
  • Creation of User-friendly Mobile services
    Personalised for Tourism
  • EU IST 5th framework project
  • Partners QMUL, Emorphia, Nortel Networks, EML,
    Fraunhofer FIT, PTIN, Sonera, University of
    Helsinki
  • Two main objectives
  • To implement, validate and trial context-aware
    tourism-related value-added services for nomadic
    users
  • To evaluate agent technology in terms of
    user-acceptability, performance and best-practice
    as a suitable approach for fast creation of
    robust, scalable, seamlessly accessible nomadic
    services

39
The CRUMPET architecture
40
Nomadic application support
41
The Control and Monitor agents
  • Provides information about QoS by monitoring
    network connections
  • QoS can be acquired in two ways by requesting it
    or subscribing to changes
  • Throughput, RTT,
  • Enables roaming between different network
    technologies
  • Manages connections both by request or
    autonomously
  • Provides means for efficient agent messaging in
    nomadic environments
  • Bit-efficient encoding of the agent messages
  • Wireless message transport protocol

42
User agent and content adaptation - Example
43
The Content Adaptation Agent
  • Device adaptation formats the content based on
    the device capabilities
  • QoS adaptation is based on the network QoS and
    user preferences
  • Adaptation process is separated in two phases,
    because
  • Sometimes only device adaptation is possible
  • It may not be possible to get the QoS for the
    wireless link
  • Normal transcoding (web) proxy can be used in QoS
    adaptation
  • Services should be allowed to format the content
    by themselves, if they prefer doing so doing
    device adaptation twice does not make sense

44
CRUMPET services
User modeling, localized services
Sights, hotels, restaurants, ...
Location-based services
45
The LEAP project
  • Lightweight Extensible Agent Platform
  • EU IST 5th framework project
  • Partners Motorola, ADAC, Broadcom, BT, Telecom
    Italia Lab, University of Parma, Siemens.
  • Addresses the need for open infrastructures and
    services which support dynamic, mobile
    enterprises
  • Knowledge management, decentralised work
    co-ordination, and travel management

46
The CASCOM project
Main objective
To develop, implement, validate, and trial of
agent-based service coordination infrastructure
for innovative Semantic Web service discovery,
composition, execution across mobile and fixed
P2P service networks.
Driving vision
Ubiquitous business application services are
flexibly coordinated and pervasively provided to
the mobile worker/user by intelligent agents in
dynamically changing contexts of open,
large-scale, and pervasive environments.
At the end of the project there will be a fully
functional proof-of-concept system showing how
business application services for mobile users
and workers can be developed using secure
agent-based intelligent P2P approach
47
The CASCOM project general approach
Seamless mobility
Semantics Agents
P2P Technologies
48
  • Standardization Work

49
FIPA IEEE Standards Committee
  • FIPA is an IEEE Computer Society standards
    organization that promotes agent-based technology
    and the interoperability of its standards with
    other technologies
  • Currently four working groups (all quite relevant
    for agents in mobile devices)
  • Agents and Web Services Interoperability Working
    Group (AWSI WG)
  • Human-Agent Communications Working Group (HAC WG)
  • Mobile Agents Working Group (MA WG)
  • P2P Nomadic Agents Working Group (P2PNA WG)
  • One study group
  • Review of FIPA Specification Study Group (ROFS SG)

50
P2P Nomadic Agents Working Group (P2PNA WG)
  • Defines a specification for agents capable of
    running on small or embedded devices, and to
    support distributed implementation of
    applications over a pure P2P network
  • Heavily influenced by the CASCOM project
  • First draft specs should come out in these days
  • Reference implementation of an agent platform
    will come out in June 2006
  • Whole working group will complete by the end of
    2006

51
Eearlier relevant FIPA specifications
  • Standard specifications
  • FIPA Nomadic Application Support Specification
  • FIPA ACL Message Representation in Bit-Efficient
    Specification
  • FIPA Agent Message Transport Envelope
    Representation in Bit Efficient Specification
  • FIPA Device Ontology Specification
  • FIPA Quality of Service Specification
  • Experimental specifications
  • FIPA Personal Assistant Specification
  • FIPA Message Buffering Service Specification
  • FIPA Agent Message Transport Protocol for WAP
    Specification

52
  • Discussion and Future Visions

53
Discussion
  • Agent(s) or agent platform on a mobile device?
  • Running platform requires resources, but should
    not consume most of them
  • Agent execution brings in overhead
  • Should we really run agents or just services?
  • Why do we need agents on the mobile device?
  • Depends on the application area
  • Would an interface to an agent be enough?
  • On really low-end device this may be the only
    option!

54
Discussion, contd
  • The killer-application for agents in mobile
    devices?
  • Agents and Web Services
  • Agents and Semantic Web
  • In the scope of CASCOM project
  • Will be the topic of next lecture

Agents and Semantic Web Services?
55
Future visions
  • Mobile devices
  • More powerful devices
  • Mobile phones and PDA devices will converge
  • Service environment and content
  • Context-aware ambient computing
  • Wireless networks
  • More bandwidth
  • Agents
  • Mobile devices will run software, and
  • Agents will be there, at least at a conceptual
    level, maybe even as a integrated service...?

56
Conclusions
  • The move towards nomadic environments
  • Implies a move from stationary to dynamic
    environment, where the QoS of the wireless
    network may change rapidly
  • New parameters to take into consideration
    location, move, just-on-time-typed services, ...
  • Software agents or agent-like software will play
    a role in managing and controlling mobile devices
    in nomadic environments
  • Mobile devices are already now capable of hosting
    agents and agent platforms, and in the future the
    devices will get even more powerful
  • Tools and languages are maturing
  • MicroFIPA-OS, JADE-LEAP, and CASCOM platforms
  • To date, a few projects about agents on mobile
    devices (but not too many...)
  • CRUMPET, LEAP, CASCOM

57
References
  • Heikki Helin, Heimo Laamanen, and Mikko
    Laukkanen. Software Agent Framework for Nomadic
    Computing. In Proceedings of the First Asian
    International Mobile Computing Conference
    (AMOC2000), pages 83-92, Penang, Malaysia,
    November 2000.
  • Heikki Helin and Mikko Laukkanen. Towards
    Efficient and Reliable Agent Communication in
    Wireless Environments. In Matthias Klush and
    Franco Zambonelli, editors, Cooperative
    Information Agents V, Proceedings of the 5th
    International Workshop (CIA-2001), number 2182 in
    Lecture Notes in Artifical Intelligence, pages
    258-263. Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Germany,
    September 2001.  
  • Mikko Laukkanen, Sasu Tarkoma, and Jani Leinonen.
    FIPA-OS Agent Platform for Small-Footprint
    Devices. In John-Jules Meyer and Milind Tambe,
    editors, Intelligent Agents VIII, Proceedings of
    the Eighth International Workshop on Agent
    Theories, Architectures, and Languages
    (ATAL-2001), number 2333 in Lecture Notes in
    Artificial Intelligence, pages 447-460.
    Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany, August 2001. 
  • Mikko Laukkanen, Heikki Helin, and Heimo
    Laamanen. Supporting Nomadic Agent-Based
    Applications in the FIPA Agent Architecture. In
    C. Castelfranchi and W. L. Johnson, editors,
    Proceedings of the First International Joint
    Conference on Autonomous Agents Multi-Agent
    Systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, Italy. pages
    1348-1355. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, Jul.
    2002. 
  • Sasu Tarkoma and Mikko Laukkanen. Supporting
    Software Agents on Small Devices. In C.
    Castelfranchi and W. L. Johnson, editors,
    Proceedings of the First International Joint
    Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent
    Systems (AAMAS-2002), Bologna, Italy. pp.
    565-566. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, Jul. 2002.
    Presented as Poster.

58
References, contd
  • Heikki Helin and Mikko Laukkanen. Efficient Agent
    Communication in Slow Wireless Networks. In A.
    Zemliak and N. E. Mastorakis, editors, Advances
    in Information Science and Soft Computing,
    Proceedings of the 2nd WSEAS International
    Conference on Information Science and
    Applications (ISA02), pages 99104, Cancun,
    Mexico, May 2002. 
  • Mikko Laukkanen, Heikki Helin and Heimo Laamanen.
    Tourists on the Move. In Matthias Klusch and
    Sascha Ossowski and Onn Shehory , editors,
    Cooperative Information Agents VI, Proceedings of
    the 6th International Workshop (CIA-2002), number
    2446 in Lecture Notes in Artifical Intelligence,
    pages 36-50, September 2002, Madrid, Spain.
    Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Heikki Helin and Mikko Laukkanen. Performance
    Analysis of Software Agent Communication in Slow
    Wireless Networks. In Proceedings of the 11th
    International Conference on Computer
    Communications and Networks. Miami, Florida, USA,
    Oct. 2002.
  • Federico Bergenti and Agostino Poggi. LEAP A
    FIPA Platform for Handheld and Mobile Devices. In
    John-Jules Meyer and Milind Tambe, editors,
    Intelligent Agents VIII, Proceedings of the
    Eighth International Workshop on Agent Theories,
    Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-2001), number
    2333 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence,
    pages 436-446. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany,
    August 2001.
  • Giovanni Adorni, Federico Bergenti, Agostino
    Poggi, and Giovanni Rimassa Enabling FIPA Agents
    on Small Devices. In Matthias Klush and Franco
    Zambonelli, editors, Cooperative Information
    Agents V, Proceedings of the 5th International
    Workshop (CIA-2001), number 2182 in Lecture Notes
    in Artifical Intelligence, pages 248-257.
    Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Germany, September
    2001.
  • Federico Bergenti, Agostino Poggi, Bernard Burg,
    and Giovanni Caire. Deploying FIPA-Compliant
    Systems on Handheld Devices. IEEE Internet
    Computing 5(4) 20-25 (2001)

59
URLs for Further Information
  • FIPA-OS and MicroFIPA-OS - http//fipa-os.sourcefo
    rge.net/index.htm
  • CRUMPET project - http//www.elec.qmul.ac.uk/crump
    et/
  • JADE - http//jade.tilab.com/
  • JADE-LEAP and LEAP project - http//leap.crm-paris
    .com/
  • CASCOM project http//www.ist-cascom.org/
  • FIPA - http//www.fipa.org
  • My related publications http//www.cs.helsinki.fi
    /u/mtlaukka/publications

60
  • Thank You!
  • Questions / Comments ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com