Jonathan Hu, Brian Marks, Qun Zhang, and Curtis Menyuk University of Maryland, Baltimore County Balt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Jonathan Hu, Brian Marks, Qun Zhang, and Curtis Menyuk University of Maryland, Baltimore County Balt

Description:

Also with Laboratory for Physical Sciences. College Park, MD ... In practice, one often wants to fix the signal gain. Distance integrated pump power is the constraint ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: HU00079
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Jonathan Hu, Brian Marks, Qun Zhang, and Curtis Menyuk University of Maryland, Baltimore County Balt


1
Jonathan Hu, Brian Marks, Qun Zhang, and Curtis
Menyuk University of Maryland, Baltimore
CountyBaltimore, MDAlso with Laboratory for
Physical SciencesCollege Park, MD
A Shooting Algorithm to Model Backward Pumped
Raman Amplifiers
2
Raman Amplification
z 0
z L
Pump
Power (log scale)
n number of pumps m number of signals j,k
wavelength index
Signal
Distance
0
50 km
For two-point boundary value problems, the
relaxation method works well
Min et al., Photon. Technol. Lett., 12(2000)
3
Gain Specification Constraint
  • In practice, one often wants to fix the signal
    gain
  • Distance integrated pump power is the constraint
  • This is no longer a two-point boundary value
    problem

In this case, the shooting method works well
Hu et al., CLEO 2003, CThD5.
4
Algorithmic Considerations
  • Accuracy
  • Robustness
  • Speed
  • Flexibility

What kind of method should we use?
5
Numerical Method
  • Relaxation method

Shooting method
z 0
z L
z 0
z L
Pump
Pump
input
input
Signal
Integration direction
Integration direction
Signal
input
input
The shooting method is more flexible
Morison et al., Communications of the ACM 5(1962)
6
Integration Method
  • Improved Euler method

Power average method
Exponential variation
Power
Zn1
Zn
Zn
Zn1
? z
? z
Both are second order accurate
Min et al., Photon. Technol. Lett., 12(2000)
7
Run Time Comparison
70
Improved Euler method
Simulation time (a.u.)
10
? Power average method
5
300
5000
1000
?z step (m)
Improved Euler is preferred
8
Robustness of the Shooting Method
  • Requirements for convergence
  • Weighted Jacobi method
  • Continuation method

9
Convergence Parameter
RMS difference between two consecutive iterations
m number of pumps l number of z steps Pi(n)
n-th iteration pump power Pi(n1) (n1)-th
iteration pump power
10
Weighted Jacobi Method
0
10
w
0.1 0.5 0.8
c
-5
10
1
10
Iteration Number
The appropriate w speeds convergence
11
Schematic for Continuation Method
Converges?
Upper tolerance
c
Lower tolerance
Input pump power
Specified input power
Iteration number
12
Algorithm Comparison
Desired attributes of an algorithm
Relaxation method
Shooting method
?
?
Accuracy Robustness Speed Flexibility
?
?
?
?
13
Conclusion
  • Shooting method is effective for solving Raman
    amplifier equations
  • Relaxation method is preferred for two-point
    boundary conditions
  • Shooting method is more flexible
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com