LTSA Project Editors Report

1
LTSA Project Editors Report

• Frank Farance, Josh Tonkel1 212 486
  4700frank_at_farance.comtonkel_at_farance.com

2
Draft 6 Ballot Results

• Already reported by J. Tyler at Athens
• Yes (9)
• No (0)
• Abstain (1)
• Comments incorporated into Draft 7

3
Athens Meeting

• Extended comment deadline 2000-12-15
• (Shouldnt do this that is purpose of ballot)
• No comments received by deadline

4
Comments Since Then

• Received comments from D. Rehak on 2001-01-01
• Response from F. Farance
• Additional comments from B. Towle
• No other comments since 2001-01-02

5
Comments from Dan Rehak

• Component description issues
• Concerns, but no specific wording suggestions
• Some components are described differently because
  their nature is different
• Some improvement possible
• Harmonization in draft 8

6
Comments from Dan Rehak

• Conformance issues
• Concerns with use of submitter
• Resolution changed to claimant
• Missing description of certain fields in Pro
  Forma ICS
• Resolution added descriptions
• Missing abbreviations for components
• Resolution added abbreviations

7
Comments from Dan Rehak

• LTSA document
• Interpretations can require effort
• Resolution Only certain portions are normative,
  response corrected misunderstanding
• Methodology should be removed
• Resolution Continually requested by educators
• Resolution Some other informative wording
  removed (30 pages less now)

8
Comments from Brendon Towle

• Conformance issue
• Need certain depend components
• Resolution Added sentence For each process or
  store to which an implementation claims
  conformance, the implementation shall also
  conform to the requirements of the input and
  output flows of that process or store.

9
Improvements Expected for Draft 8

• Remove wording on bus diagrams because they
  arent used
• Not sure about Methodology, need guidance
• Would like example from ADL or Claude that LTSA
  doesnt address
• Need specific wording changes