The ALICE Muon Spectrometer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The ALICE Muon Spectrometer

Description:

Study the production of J/y, y', Y, Y', Y'' decaying into m m ... Power up Oct. 2003. Moving to final position : March 2004. End of installation : June 2004 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: conferen
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The ALICE Muon Spectrometer


1
The ALICEMuon Spectrometer
  • Andreas Morsch
  • ALICE Collaboration
  • IV International Symposium
  • on LHC Physics and Detectors
  • Fermilab, May 1-3 2003

2
Outline
  • Muon Spectrometer overview
  • Muon Spectrometer components
  • Tracking Chambers
  • Trigger Chambers
  • Absorbers
  • Dipole Magnet
  • Expected performance

3
Design Goals
  • Study the production of J/y, y', Y, Y', Y
    decaying into mm-
  • In the range 2.5 lt h lt 4 (2 lt q lt 9)
  • With mass resolutions of 70 MeV at the J/y and
    100 MeV at the Y
  • Separate Y family
  • Dp/p lt 1 _at_ p 150 GeV
  • Acceptance at low angles
  • Small angle absorber (beam shield)
  • Robust tracking in high random background
    environment
  • High granularity chambers
  • Combined angle-angle and sagitta measurement with
    3 Tm dipole field

4
  • - 5 stations of high granularity cathode pad
    tracking chambers (CPCs), over 1.1 M channels
  • - 2 chambers per station

RPC Trigger Chambers
5
Dipole Magnet
Front Absorber
Trigger
Tracking Stations
6
Tracking
  • All stations with cathode segmentation varying
    with distance to beam axis
  • Higher hit density close to the beam-pipe
  • Both cathodes segmented (bending/non-bending
    plane)
  • Bending plane resolution lt100 mm
  • Transparent X/X0 3
  • Muon stations 1-2
  • Quadrants
  • Frameless chambers
  • Muon stations 3-5
  • Slat design similar for all stations
  • Production shared between several labs

7
Station 1
  • 1999 Prototype
  • Anode-cathode gap 2.5 mm
  • Pad size 5 x 7.5 mm2
  • Spatial resolution 43 mm
  • Efficiency 95
  • Gain homogeneity 12
  • New requirements (2000)
  • Suppression of the Al frames of Stations 1, 2
    (7 acceptance)
  • Decrease of the occupancy of Station 1
  • Decrease of the pad sizes ( 4.2 x 6.3 mm2)
  • Decrease of anode-cathode gap (2.1 mm)

8
Station 1
  • Mechanical prototype (fall 2001)
  • Max. deformation 80 mm
  • Full quadrant (June 2002)
  • 0.7 m2 frameless structure
  • 14000 channels per cathode
  • Gas 80 Ar 20 CO2
  • 3 zones with different pad sizes

9
Test Beam Results
Resolution 65 mm
  • Unacceptable gain variations
  • Solved by
  • Improved closing procedure
  • Improved stiffness with central spacer
  • Gain variations 150 ? 20

10
Stations 3-5
  • Tests
  • Test-beam Sept. 2002
  • Ageing studies at GIF on a small mock-up foreseen
    by May
  • In-beam tests of a rounded shape at SPS planned
    in June- July
  • Production
  • Sharing between 4 institutes completed
  • Slats production starts Sept. 2003
  • Station construction 6/2004-10/2005
  • Installation 6/2005-11/2005

11
Stations 3-5
  • Comparison of different pad sizes
  • 5 x 50 mm2
  • 5 x 100 mm2

12
FEE MANU
13
FEE MANU
  • MANU with Gassiplex works well
  • MANU with MANAS under tests
  • MARC3
  • Small problems found in last test-beam
  • New iteration May 2003
  • Final version October 2003

14
Trigger
  • Principle
  • Transverse momentum cut using correlation of
    position and angle
  • Deflection in dipole vertex constraint
  • 4 RPC planes ?6x6 m2
  • Maximum counting rates
  • 3 Hz/cm2 in Pb-Pb
  • 40 Hz/cm2 in Ar-Ar
  • 10 Hz/cm2 in pp
  • important contribution from beam gas
  • The chambers
  • Single gap RPC, low resistivity bakelite,
    streamer mode
  • Gas mixture Ar-C2H2F4-C4H10-SF6 _at_
    50.5-41.3-7.2-1

15
Aging Tests
  • Aging test to improve chamber life-time
  • Test at the CERN Gamma Irradiation Facility (GIF)
    show
  • Increase of dark current and dark rate
  • Chem. surface deterioration (HF)
  • Decrease of efficiency
  • Bakelite deterioration

16
Lifetime Tests
  • - Double-layer line-seed oil RPC with dry gas
  • - 1 SF6 instead of 4 increases the lifetime
  • Constant efficiency over the whole period (100
    LHC PbPb periods)

100 PbPb periods equivalent to 5 year running
scenario - 2 years PbPb - 1 year Ar-Ar - 1
years p-Pb - 3 year full intensity pp
17
Trigger System Planning
  • Summer 2003 end of test RPC1
  • PRR RPC October 2003
  • Production of readout strips end 2003 (2
    months)
  • Gas gap production end 2003 to 02/04
  • Beginning of assembling 01/04
  • Tests of chambers with cosmics throughout 2004

18
Absorbers
- Suppress p/Km decay - Shield from secondaries
in particular at small radii.
19
Front Absorber (FA)
  • 10 lI (Carbon Concrete Steel)
  • Design completed
  • Stability issues (earth quake) for support
    structure to be solved

FASS
Steel
Concrete
Carbon
Tungsten
20
Small Angle Absorber (SAA)
2
0.8
Lead
Tungsten
  • Design almost completed after several iterations.
    Complex integration issues
  • Inner interface
  • Vacuum system, bake-out, bellows, flanges
  • Outer interface
  • Tracking chambers, recesses

21
FA and SAA Planning
  • Delivery of big parts (W, Pb, Fe ...) all on
    site in Oct. 03
  • Beginning installation FASS Jan. 2004
  • End FASS Feb. 2004
  • Beginning assembling SA1 SA2 FA May 2004
  • End of assembling Sept. 2004
  • Installation in Oct. Nov. 2004

22
Dipole Magnet
  • 3 Tm, resistive coil
  • Bnom 0.7 T
  • Gap l x h x w
  • 5 m x 5.1m x (2.5 4.1) m
  • Yoke machining done (Dec. 2002)
  • Yoke delivery April 2003
  • Then beginning of installation in testing area
  • Dummy coil done (Oct. 2002)
  • Coil winding started in Jan. 03
  • Coils delivery August 2003
  • Then installation for testing
  • Power up Oct. 2003
  • Moving to final position March 2004
  • End of installation June 2004

23
Yoke Assembly
24
Dummy Coil
25
Shaping Tool
26
Expected Performance
Acceptance down to pT 0
Geometrical acceptance 5
J/?
?
27
Mass Resolution
Design values
Contribution from front absorber higher -
Non-Gaussian straggling - Electrons produced
close to muons
Current value after full simulation and
reconstruction 90 MeV (goal lt 100 MeV)
28
Robustness of tracking
  • Hit reconstruction
  • Maximum Likelihood - Expectation Maximization
    algorithm
  • Tracking
  • Kalman filter

Reduced dependence on background level !
29
Muon Cocktail
30
Mass Spectra
  • ?M 90 MeV/c2 at the ?
  • Separation of ?, ?, ?
  • Total efficiency 75
  • Expected statistics (significance _at_1yr)
  • central min. bias
  • J/? 310 574
  • ? 12 23
  • ? 39 69
  • ? 19 35
  • ? 12 22
  • From min. bias events
  • 8k ? and 700k J/? /yr

31
Heavy Flavor Production
Di-muons from beauty production can be used for
normalisation.
32
Conclusions
  • ALICE Dimuon Spectrometer project is overall in
    good shape
  • Some improvement and studies ongoing
  • Station 1 gain homogeneity
  • RPC life-time
  • Some production already started and the remaining
    should begin in 2003
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com