Writing Excellence Four: Collaborative Scoring - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Writing Excellence Four: Collaborative Scoring

Description:

Review the research about collaborative scoring. Identify the process of ... student wrote about the book; the exemplary student compared and contrasted it ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Writing Excellence Four: Collaborative Scoring


1
Writing Excellence Four Collaborative Scoring
2
Colleagues in this session will
  • Review the research about collaborative scoring.
  • Identify the process of collaborative scoring.
  • Participate in an actual scoring process.
  • Identify places and times to implement
    collaborative scoring.

3
Welcome to our presentation.
  • Please take a moment to look at the rubrics that
    you brought.
  • When you review the elements of an effective
    rubric, does your current writing rubric address
    each component effectively?
  • Take a few minutes to look at the scoring rubric
    of your school.
  • Share what you think is effective about your
    rubric.
  • What might be ineffective.

4
Clarity
  • Good rubrics rate high in clarity when it is easy
    for everyone involved (students and teachers
    alike) to understand what is meant.
  • Terms are defined, as is each level of
    proficiency.
  • Samples of student work have been collected to
    illustrate the various levels of performance.

5
Content
  • Rubrics rate high in content when everything of
    importance is included-nothing of importance is
    left out.
  • Rubrics do leave out things that are tangential
    to student success.

6
Practical
  • Good rubrics are practical when everything is
    easy to understand and apply.
  • Students can use the criteria for self
    assessment.
  • The information provided from rating is useful
    for deciding what to learn next.
  • The number of ingredients are manageable.

7
Fair
  • The ratings of actual student performance are
    fair when they depict what students can do and do
    well.
  • The results are valid. That means that
    independent raters including the student agree on
    the level of proficiency demonstrated.

8
What do you like about the rubric? Improvements?
  • Share some thoughts about what you like about the
    rubric?
  • How can the rubric be improved?
  • Lets take a few moments to discuss this. Please
    share your thoughts.

9
Congratulations!
  • These conversations are a big step toward the art
    of collaboration Communication.
  • We are going to come back to the rubric. For now
    lets look to some reasons why collaboration is
    important.

10
Why is collaboration important?
  • In many schools, even though there is a scoring
    guide or a rubric, this rubric may be ignored or
    not implemented in all classrooms.
  • Many teachers may feel uncomfortable with the
    rubric or not feel like they can explain the
    benchmarks to the students.
  • Many teachers may feel like they are not as much
    as an expert because of differing expertise,
    years served, or background.

11
A focal point for collaboration
  • We all bring a differing
  • Viewpoints
  • Expertise
  • Background
  • These should all be valued as we work through
    the collaborative process.

12
How to begin
  • By reviewing your own state rubric as a team and
    making relevant revisions or changes.
  • By creating a common language that each teacher
    will use given a specific grade/year/content
    area.
  • By creating rubrics for the major assignments
    that you all share.
  • By setting benchmark papers by the teachers and
    for the students to share and look at.
  • By communicating the rubrics and standards to the
    stakeholders in the school.

13
Guidelines for looking at student work
  • Gather a team, or small group, of teachers
    together.
  • Select a piece of student work. The sample should
    demonstrate a rich variety of student learning.
    It can be a work-in-progress, a final piece, or a
    document of a performance. Also collect the
    scoring guide or rubric used to assess that
    piece. Make copies for team members..

14
Guidelines for looking at student work
  • If someone in the group is not familiar with your
    unit of study, take a few minutes to introduce
    its overall purpose, the activities that have
    been conducted, and the work that has been
    generated.
  • Discuss and write down one standard from the
    rubric that you expected students to address in
    this activity. What did you expect the students
    to know and be able to do?

15
Guidelines for looking at student work
  • Next, take a few minutes to look at the work as a
    group. Either read it aloud, or let each person
    take a turn looking at it.Write down the group's
    observations about the work. Then write down
    comments and questions. You might allow each team
    member to do this first individually and then
    share in turn.

16
Guidelines for looking at student work
  • Next, use your scoring guide or rubric to assess
    the piece of work. If you do not yet have a
    scoring guide, reread the standard you have
    identified and assess the work based on its
    criteria. (You might put together an informal
    rubric by doing this.)

17
Guidelines for looking at student work
  • Take a few minutes to discuss as a team the
    following questions What can you see from your
    observations, comments, and questions that will
    help you assess student learning? How might these
    observations determine your next steps as a
    teacher? Do these observations tell you anything
    new about your unit of study or classroom
    activities?

18
Document your observationsNow answer these
questionsQuestion One
  • What should students know and be able to
    do?Select one standard that is most directly
    related to the activity from which the student
    work was created. Please write out the entire
    standard.

19
Question Two
  • What were students asked to do?Clearly outline
    the activity or performance that students were
    asked to conduct. Use concrete examples.

20
Question Three
  • What story does the work tell?
  • Take some time and look deeply at the student
    work.
  • For your own use, record your observations,
    comments, and questions. Look specifically for
    evidence that your selected standard has been
    addressed. Analyze the student work using your
    standard to assess student learning. Using your
    observations as evidence, discuss how one can
    tell that the student has understood and
    synthesized the knowledge, skills, and concepts
    addressed in the standard.

21
Question Four
  • How good is good enough?Use your scoring rubric
    or other assessment tools to assess your sample
    of student work. Describe how the student has
    exceeded, met, or failed to meet the expectations
    set forth by the scoring rubric. Include a copy
    of the rubric if possible.

22
Question Six
  • How can your inquiry guide further
    instruction?Discuss what your inquiry into the
    sample of student work tells you about student
    learning, classroom instruction, and the
    assignment given. How might you do things
    differently in the future?

23
A look at one scoring guide
  • The terminology used in standards-based
    assessments can be confusing. Dr. Doug Reeves
    terms "scoring guides" and "rubrics" as
    interchangeable.
  • Also, there are 4-point and 6-point rubrics used
    in different school systems with varying terms to
    describe each level.
  • The model in this presentation uses a 4-point
    system and the terms exemplary, proficient,
    progressing and not meeting the standard for the
    different levels.

24
The 4-point system a comparison to standards.
  • Each task of an assessment is scored separately.
    The number of students who score at each level
    can and will vary tremendously. There is no
    grading on a curve. The students performance is
    compared to standards, not to other students'
    performances. The scores do not represent grades
    A through D. Each of the scores is explained
    briefly below.

25
Score of 4
  • Exemplary is more than grade appropriate
  • A score of Exemplary should be given only to
    responses that include elements that are beyond
    the required elements of proficiency. The
    response includes a demonstration of exceptional
    higher-order thinking skills. This level of
    performance illustrates additional application or
    synthesis of knowledge. To be exemplary at the
    standard, the student has to handle more
    complexity, do more analysis, and/or demonstrate
    creativity.

26
Examples of 4
  • For example, the proficient student got the
    calculations correct and built the table and
    graph the exemplary student made additional
    predictions and estimations and noticed an
    exception to the general rule.
  • The proficient student wrote about the book the
    exemplary student compared and contrasted it with
    three other pieces of literature, and drew
    additional conclusions about what was read.

27
Score of 3
  • Proficiency is the benchmark
  • A score of Proficient indicates a level of
    performance that meets a important criteria of
    the applicable standard or standards. It
    represents complete mastery of the skills. The
    student must meet all of the list for a
    proficient score.

28
Score of 2
  • Performances that are Progressing must contain
    some, but will not contain all of the elements of
    a proficient score. A score of progressing can
    also be given to responses that contain all of
    the elements of a proficient also may contain
    additional incorrect or irrelevant information,
    Again the list of criteria for a progressing
    performance is not exhaustive, but demonstrates a
    level of quality that does not yet indicate a
    proficient performance.

29
Thoughts on scores of 2
  • It maybe appropriate to tell students and parents
    that receiving Progressing score on a task the
    first time it is done does not indicate a student
    is "behind." The tasks are designed to be
    rigorous, making teacher feedback and task
    revision a part of the learning process,

30
Score of 1
  • Not meeting the standards)
  • Responses receive this score when the task is
    incomplete or when it is clear that the student
    did not understand the task The student should
    repeat the task before going on to the next task
    on the assessment. Students should be encouraged
    to continue revising thinking, and attempting
    until the task is mastered.

31
Final Thoughts
  • This collaborative process will allow you to
  • Discuss your expertise with your fellow
    colleagues.
  • Look to student work outside your classroom.

32
An example of different levels of performance
  • Here we use an example of learning to fly a
    plane
  • Take some time with your group to determine what
    a proficient pilot is?
  • An exemplary pilot?
  • A progressing pilot?
  • A pilot who is not meeting the standards?

33
Who would you feel comfortable with as a
passenger and why?
  • Take a moment to share your thoughts.
  • Discussion

34
For current implementation
  • Please identify the times and places you have
    implemented for collaborative scoring.
  • Create a schedule for refining the rubrics
  • Please create a scoring checklist for your team
    or grade.

35
Thank you ?
  • Thanks for being with me today. I have enjoyed
    our work together.
  • Have a great week ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com