Biodegradation Processes for Chlorinated Solvents - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Biodegradation Processes for Chlorinated Solvents

Description:

Engineered system to increase the intrinsic biodegradation rate to reduce ... Laboratory or small-scale field studies required to determine if particular ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:304
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: doctorfl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Biodegradation Processes for Chlorinated Solvents


1
Biodegradation Processes for Chlorinated Solvents
2
Dehalogenation
  • Stripping halogens (generally Chlorine) from an
    organic molecule
  • Generally an anaerobic process, and is often
    referred to as reductive dechlorination
  • RCl 2e H gt RH Cl
  • Can occur via
  • Dehalorespiration (anaerobic)
  • Cometabolism (aerobic)

3
Dehalorespiration
  • Certain chlorinated organics can serve as a
    terminal electron acceptor, rather than as a
    donor
  • Confirmed only for chlorinated ethenes
  • Rapid, compared to cometabolism
  • High percentage of electron donor goes toward
    dechlorination
  • Dehalorespiring bacteria depend on
    hydrogen-producing bacteria to produce H2, which
    is the preferred primary substrate

4
Reductive Dechlorination ofChlorinated Ethenes
  • CCl CCl PCE
  • CHClCCl TCE
  • CHClCHCl 1,2 DCE
  • CH CHCl VC

2
2
2
2
H
Ethylene CH CH
CO Carbon dioxide
2
2
2
5
Added Danger
  • Dechlorination of PCE and TCE should be
    encouraged, but monitored closely
  • The dechlorination products of PCE are more
    hazardous than the parent compound
  • DCE is 50 times more hazardous than TCE
  • Vinyl Chloride is a known carcinogen

6
Cometabolism
  • Fortuitous transformation of a compound by a
    microbe relying on some other primary substrate
  • Generally a slow process - Chlorinated solvents
    dont provide much energy to the microbe
  • Most oxidation is of primary substrate, with only
    a few percent of the electron donor consumption
    going toward dechlorination of the contaminant
  • Not all chlorinated solvents susceptible to
    cometabolism (e.g., PCE and carbon tetrachloride)

7
Cometabolic Transformations ofChlorinated
Aliphatic Hydrocarbons (CAHs)
  • CCl CHCl Cl C CHCl
    CO , Cl ,H O

8
Classification System for Chlorinated Solvent
Plumes
  • Type 1 Anaerobic due to anthropogenic carbon
  • Type 2 Anaerobic due to naturally occurring
    carbon
  • Type 3 Aerobic due to no fermentation
    substrates

9
Dechlorination Zones
10
Natural Attenuation
Will it work for Chlorinated Solvents?
11
Natural Reductive Dechlorination
  • Natural dechlorination of solvents in aquifers
    with rich organic load and low redox potential
  • Not frequently found
  • Many chlorinated solvent plumes located in low
    organic load, aerobic aquifers

12
Natural Attenuation
Not fast enough Not complete enough Not
frequent enough to be broadly used for some
compounds, especially chlorinated solvents
13
Enhanced Bioattenuation
  • Engineered system to increase the intrinsic
    biodegradation rate to reduce contaminant mass
  • Usually addition of electron acceptors (oxygen,
    nitrate, sulfate) or electron donors (organic
    carbon, hydrogen)
  • Could involve bioaugmentation - adding the
    catalyst for bioattenuation

14
Enhanced Bioattenuation of Chlorinated Solvents
  • Inadequate electron donor concentrations
  • Determine methods of adding electron donors

15
In Situ Biodegradation of Chlorinated Solvents
16
Enhanced Bioattenuation
Petroleum Chlorinated Technology
Hydrocarbons Solvents (e acceptor) (e
donor) Liquid Delivery Oxygen Benzoate
Nitrate Lactate Sulfate Molasses Carbohydra
tes Biosparge Air (oxygen) Ammonia Hydrogen
Propane Slow-release Oxygen Hydrogen
(ORC) (HRC)
17
Selective Enhancement of Reductive Dechlorination
  • Competition for available H2 in subsurface
  • Dechlorinators can utilize H2 at lower
    concentrations than methanogens or
    sulfate-reducers
  • Addition of more complex substrates that can only
    be fermented at low H2 partial pressures may
    provide competitive advantage to dechlorinators

18
Electron Donors
  • Alcohols and acids
  • Almost any common fermentable compound
  • Hydrogen apparently universal electron donor, but
    no universal substrate
  • Laboratory or small-scale field studies required
    to determine if particular substrate will support
    dechlorination at particular site

19
Electron Donors
Acetate Hydrogen - Pickle liquor Acetic
acid biochemical Polylactate esters Benzoate
electrochemical Propionate Butyrate gas
sparge Propionic acid Cheese whey Humic acids
- Sucrose Chicken manure naturally occurring
Surfactants - Corn steep liquor Isopropanol
Terigitol5-S-12 Ethanol Lactate Witconol
2722 Glucose Lactic acid Tetraalkoxsilanes Hydroc
arbon Methanol Wastewater contaminants
Molasses Yeast extract Mulch
20
Electron Donor Demand
  • Theoretical demand for 1 g PCE 0.4 g COD
  • Must use many times more substrate due to
    competition for electron donors
  • Minimum of 60 mg/L TOC to support dechlorination
    beyond DCE in microcosm studies in Victoria, TX
    soils (Lee et al., 1997)

21
Electron Donor Technology in Field-Scale Pilots
Electron Electron Site Reference Donor
Acceptor Benzoate CO Victoria, TX Beeman et al
1994 Beeman 1994 Acetate NO Moffett Air
Field, CA Semprini et al 1992 Schoolcraft,
MI Dybas et al 1997 Yeast Extract SO
/CO Niagara Falls, NY Buchanan et al
1995 Methanol / ? FAA facility, OK Christopher
et al 1997 Sucrose Tergito15-S-12 SO Corpus
Christie, TX Lee et al 1995 Witconol
2722 Methanol ? Breda, Netherlands Spuij et al
1997
2
3
2
4
4
22
Electron Donor Technology in Field-Scale Pilots
Electron Electron Site Reference Donor
Acceptor Lactic acid ? Watertown, MA ABB
Environmental Lactate Fe Dover AFB,
DE Grindstaff 1998 Benzoate / Lactate
/ ? Pinellas, Fl US DOE 1998 Methanol Molasses
? Eastern PA Nyer et al 1998 Molasses ? Willi
amsport, PA Nyer Suthersan 1996
3
23
Engineered Delivery Systems
  • Air injection into vadose zone - venting /
    bioventing
  • Air injection into ground water - air sparging /
    biosparging
  • Gas, other than air, injection into ground water
    - ammonia, hydrogen, propane
  • Slow release into ground water - ORC, HRC
  • Liquid addition - infiltration or injection
    wells, surfactant / cosolvent flush
  • Recirculation - extraction / reinjection systems,
    UVB wells, pump and treat

24
Hydrogen Sparging
Promotes in situ biodegradation - Minimize
hydrogen gas entering unsaturated zone
25
Hydrogen Releasing Compound (HRC )
  • A food grade polylactate ester slowly degraded to
    lactic acid
  • Lactic acid metabolized to acetic acid with
    production of hydrogen
  • Hydrogen drives reductive dechlorination

26
Hydrogen Releasing Compound (HRC )
  • A moderately flowable, injectable material
  • Facilitates passive barrier designs
  • Slow hydrolysis rate of lactic acid from ester
    keeps hydrogen concentration low, may favor
    reductive dechlorination over methanogenesis

27
Hydrogen Releasing Compound (HRC )

28
HRC Application
  • Delivery Systems - bore-hole backfill or
    injection via direct-push technologies
  • Designs for Barriers and Source Treatment
  • 1. Upgradient 1
    2 3 4
  • barrier
  • 2. Series of
  • barriers
  • 3. Downgradient
  • barrier
  • 4. Grid of HRC
  • injection points

29
Substrates for Bioattenuation of CAHs (Lee et al,
1997)
any substrate that will yield hydrogen under
fermentative and/or methanogenic conditions will
... support dechlorination of PCE to DCE if the
microbial population is capable of ... the
dechlorination reaction biotransformation of
DCE to VC and ethene ... not ... universal and
may require specific substrates or enrichment
strategies
30
Substrates for Bioattenuation of CAHs (Lee et al,
1998)
No substrate that reliably supports complete
dechlorination at all sites has been identified
to date.
31
Limitations for Applicationof Bioattenuation
Technologies
  • Delivery of materials to the subsurface (contact)
  • Bioavailability of the contaminants
  • Toxicity of contaminants
  • Threshold substrate concentration

32
Contact in the Subsurface
33
Toxicity of Trichloroethylene
Air or water in contact with oily phase may
exceed toxic limit for microorganisms TCE
gt 6 mg/L in water (30 reduction 1.8 mg/L
Moffett field) gt 2 mg/L in air
34
Maximum Solvent Concentrations for Reductive
Dechlorination
Solvent Concentration Reference (mg/L) PCE
50 Smatlak et al 1996 cis-DCE 8.0 Haston et
al 1994 VC 1.9 - 3.8 DiStefano et al
1991 DCM 66 Freedman Gossett
1991 TCA 100 Galli McCarty 1989
35
What We Dont Know
  • Should you use a slow, controlled release or
    large/small periodic dosing of electron donor?
  • Is it redox reduction or electron donor addition
    that triggers reductive dechlorination?
  • Under field conditions, does competion for
    hydrogen exist between dechlorinators,
    methanogens, and sulfate reducers? Does it
    matter?

36
Prognosis?
Electron Donor Technology for engineered
bioattenuation of CAHs will equal the impact of
Electron Acceptor Technology on
bioremediation of HCs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com