Clause%209%20Comment%20Resolution%201/16/03%20Atlanta,%20GA

1
Clause 9 Comment Resolution1/16/03 Atlanta, GA
2
Clause 9 Comment Resolution

• 181 total comments
• 95 technical
•  license granted for editorial
• 4 rejected
• 2 carried over (create adhoc KK)
• 1 punted to WG (multichoke)
• 1 punted to Clause 6 (classB delay bound)
• Byte counts moved back into fairness

3
CRG response to KK Comments

• It was agreed that an adHoc committee would be
  formed to
• evaluate the proposals made in comments 933 and
  939. Harry Peng
• agreed to host appropriate conference calls.
  Technical editor
• and K.K. Ramakrishnan will communicate to ensure
  that results of
• this effort will be available for review at least
  two weeks
• prior to the March 2003 Plenary. The effort will
  include evaluation of
• the implementation impact of these comments. It
  was further agreed
• that this comment will be carried over to the
  March
• 2003 plenary. The scope of the adHoc is further
• specified in the accompanying slide
  (KKR_adhoc_01).

4
Punted to WG

•  Providing MC facilities to the client is not a
  stated goal of the standard. MC FCM messages
  needlessly complicate this standard and no real
  client is clearly specified.
• Remove Multi-Choke Fairness mechanism in order to
  simplify this standard.