Title: Evidence for equilibrium forces structuring communities
 1Equilibrium models of species coexistence
Evidence for equilibrium forces structuring 
communities If community composition is 
dictated by niche assembly then... 1. Pattern 
of species occupancy in a community should be 
predictable and stable. 2. Perturbations to a 
community should result in a return to a stable 
equilibrium composition after disturbance. 
 BUT... How do you determine through 
observation if natural communities are at or near 
equilibrium when rates of change in composition 
are slow? 
 2What evidence is there for community stability?
 - Several examples with insect communities in 
which species have annual life cycles Lawton 
and Gaston (1989) looked at composition of 20 
spp of insects living on plots of bracken fern in 
the UK over 7 years and at 2 sites (woodland and 
open). Found that species relative abundances 
remained remarkably similar year after year, and 
that rank timing of appearance of insect species 
was similar each year Unclear how much 
disturbance to the system over the 
study. Composition apparently not driven by 
interspecific competition. Community is composed 
of herbivores with different feeding niches. 
Density-dependent predation important? 
 3Several other examples of long term stability in 
community composition eg Ocean plankton, 
(McGowan and Walker 1979) Odonates in lakes 
(Crowley and Johnson 1992), Rothamstead Park 
grassland experiment (Silvertown 1987) Fewer 
examples of predictable responses to community 
disturbance Terborgh (1996) Substitute space 
for time by examining chronosequences. What 
evidence that successional sequences culminate in 
mature phase forests with similar species 
composition and similar species abundance 
patterns? 
 4Terborgh looked at primary successional sequences 
on river-bends in the Manu river in SE 
Peru. Over long distances the Manu river 
produces many point bars - often separated by 
several km of upland forest differing in species 
composition. Individual bars are largely isolated 
from one-another by a matrix of upland 
forest Looked at composition in plots in 
floodplain forest at 3 sites lt1 km from each 
other and two sites 30 and 40 km away
Meanders in the river generate replicated point 
bars of deposition of silt on the inside of the 
bend and erosion on the outer bend. Over 
approximately 300 yr vegetation on the bar 
attains a mature stage floodplain forest. 
 5Point bars along the Manu river, Peru 
 6Rank abundance for most common spp (out of 386) 
present in 1000 tree samples on five mature 
forest floodplains 
 7Terborgh paper concludes The non-equilibrium 
model, although useful as a null hypothesis is 
exasperatingly devoid of biology. There is a vast 
difference between saying that we do not exist, 
and saying that we do not fully understand what 
they are. Although null models based on random 
processes can serve as useful guides, they are no 
substitute for hypotheses based on explicit 
biological mechanisms. Only through the latter 
will significant progress be made toward 
understanding diversity 
 8Perhaps even better evidence for constancy in 
community composition comes from studies of coral 
reefs (Pandolfi 1996) - For each site 
found no significant difference in taxonomic 
composition of the reefs over time even though 
during any one reef-building episode only about 
25 of spp present in the available species pool 
actually occupied a particular reef environment. 
Looked at coral composition of reef communities 
at 3 sites in Papua New Guinea over a 95,000 yr 
period during which sea level fluctuated up to 
120 m and sea temp 6oC. This resulted in 9 
cycles of perturbation and reef re-assembly. 
 9Found that variation in space greater than in 
time... - Variation in coral reef assemblages 
among sites at any rebuilding episode gt that at 
any one site among the 9 rebuilding 
episodes Evidence from these coral reefs 
suggests that some marine communities exhibit 
consistent patterns of assembly - more so than 
comparable terrestrial systems from the 
quaternary period Why? 
 10Processes allowing persistence of numerous 
species in equilibrium communities  Resource 
variation?? What conditions are necessary? (Think 
R)  Variation in physical or biotic factors 
influencing a species resource requirements  
Fine scale partitioning of food resources 
(animals)  Fine scale partitioning of 
regeneration requirements (plants)  Density 
dependent population regulation 
 11Density-dependent predation increased rate of 
predation when prey are abundant First 
recognized by Janzen (1970) and Connell (1971) in 
two independent papers. Hence referred to as 
Janzen-Connell Hypothesis They predicted 
that host-specific pests reduce recruitment near 
susceptible adults (where seed density is 
greatest) thereby freeing up space for other 
plant species. Janzen-Connell mechanism could 
provide a limit on abundance of common species 
(and conversely an advantage to rare species) - 
why? 
 12Janzens (1970) graphical representation of seed 
predation creating recruitment space around 
conspecifics. (Hubbell has a rescaled version of 
this allowing recruitment below the crown) 
 13How common are Janzen-Connell effects? 
Hammond and Brown (1998) reviewed 46 studies that 
compared seed or seedling performance near or far 
from conspecifics. Performance lower near the 
conspecific for  15/19 populations whose 
principal herbivore was an insect  2/27 
populations with principal herbivore a vertebrate 
(maybe because polyphagous and wider ranging?)  
Very little information about pathogens Could 
J-C effects be responsible for high diversity in 
the tropics? 
 14Packer and Clay (2000) Spatial patterns of 
seedling mortality
Looked at limitation to recruitment of black 
cherry (Prunus serotina) in Indiana by soil 
pathogens Some pathogens might generate strong 
Janzen-Connell effects if they host specific 
because they can increase rapidly in abundance 
and can persist in the soil 
 15Packer and Clay observed that for cherry a) 
seedling and b) juvenile survival increased with 
distance from an adult cherry tree and with 
decreasing cherry neighbourhood density 
(seedlings only)
Hypothesized that lower mortality was due to soil 
borne pathogens How would you test this 
hypothesis? 
 16Isolate soil effects from other potential factors 
that might covary with distance from parent
Conduct pot experiment with soil from different 
sources (Cherry density and distance from the 
parent) 
 17Strongest evidence that pathogens are involved 
requires fulfilling Kochs postulates
C1 Potting mix only C2 Potting mix  sterile 
fungal growth medium P1-3 5ml of inoculum  
potting mix 
 18 What about community level effects of 
density-dependence? Harms et al (2000) evaluated 
density dependence at the critical seed-seedling 
transition phase by comparing numbers of seedling 
recruits R appearing in plots, to the number of 
seeds S, captured in adjacent traps. Evaluated 
the relationship with a the power law R  cSb 
where c and b are constants so, logR  logc  
blogS ask if the slope, b, differs from 1 
 19Seeds (S) in traps
Seedlings (R) in soil 
 20Evaluated 53 species from seed captures at 200 
census locations and found that b lt1 for every 
species indicating negative density dependence 
(median value of b  0.23)
Relationship between seed density and seedling 
density for Trichilia tuberculata (Meliaceae)
Seedling recruit density
Seed density 
 21Okay all spp show density-dependent recruitment 
- what is the community consequence?
Ask how does local community diversity of trapped 
seeds compare to that of seedling recruits. - 
First took into account mean transition 
probabilities of different species (on average, 
how many seeds are needed to generate a seedling 
recruit). - Use mean transition probabilities 
to calculate expected seedling numbers of each 
species in each seedling plot. Calculated the 
Shannon-Weiner diversity index for each plot 
based on these predicted seedling numbers. - 
Second, used the slope of regressions of 
seed-seedling plots to calculate predicted 
seedling number for given seed number 
 22Difference in diversity indices for 53 spp 
comparing seed rain to traps to seedling 
recruits in plots Adding mean values for 
seed-seedling transition probabilities helps a 
bit Using the predicted seedling abundance 
values from regressions centers the 2 
distributions... 
 23Hubbell et al. (2001) looked at density effects 
at next stage (sapling stage) on BCI - Critical 
to this study is that they have data on the fate 
of huge numbers of saplings (250,000) monitored 
over 13 years (previous analyses with shorter 
census periods did not yield the same results) - 
Used logistic regression analysis to calculate 
the odds of survival of a large number of species 
as a function of the structure and composition of 
their close biotic neighbourhood - Neighbourhood 
variables  stem density, relative plant size, 
number of conspecific neighbours, and species 
richness. - Strongest neighbourhood effects for 
the 2.5 m annulus around each focal plant 
 24Survival probability of pioneers more strongly 
affected by presence of conspecific neighbours...
X axis  proportion of trees within 2.5 m that 
are the same species (conspecific)
Rare species much more strongly affected than 
are common species might explain why rare 
species are rare?? 
 25What about groups of organism other than plants??
Classical theory (Hutchinson 1957, 1959) argues 
that fine partitioning of feeding niches can 
support the diversity of herbivores Increasing 
body size of organisms at higher trophic levels 
limits population density and may limit how 
finely feeding niches are divided - constraining 
diversity? Very few tests of theories of 
diversity maintenance for insects - what would 
you need to do to test equilibrium vs 
non-equilibrium models for the maintenance of 
insect diversity?? 
 26Novotny et al. (2002) Host specificity of 
herbivorous insects in New Guinea
- Analyzed host preferences of 900 insects on 51 
 plant species
- Most species feed on several (congeneric) host 
 species. Tight specificity is rare
- Even phylogenetically distant hosts shared a 
 third of herbivores
- An average tree hosted 
- 33 Coleoptera 
- 26 Lepidoptera 
- 20 orthopterids
27FT total number herbivores found on all hosts
total host plant records involving those hosts
Butterflies
Other lepidoptera
Coleoptera
orthopterids