Cartilage Tympanoplasty - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Cartilage Tympanoplasty

Description:

Mucosal layers of TM and middle ear linings undergo constant migration ... If contralateral ear is perforated, perform adenoidectomy and defer until age 7 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2472
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: UTM7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cartilage Tympanoplasty


1
Cartilage Tympanoplasty
K. Kevin Ho, MD Tomoko Makishima, MD PhD Univ. of
Texas Medical Branch, Dept. of Otolaryngology
Grand Rounds Presentation March 19, 2008
2
History of Tympanoplasty
  • Banzer (1640) repair TM w/ pigs bladder.
  • Toynbee (1853) rubber disk.
  • Blake (1877) paper patch.
  • Zoellner and Wullstein in 1952, using STSG
  • 1958 Jansen
  • First reported use of cartilage in OCR
  • 1963 Salen and Jansen
  • First reported use of cartilage for
    reconstruction of the TM

3
Tympanic Membrane
  • Oval shape.
  • 8x10 mm.
  • 55 angle w/ respect to floor of meatus.
  • 130 µm thick.
  • 3 layers
  • Outer epithelial keratinizing squamous
  • Middle fibrous superficial radial, deep
    circular
  • Inner mucosa

4
Tympanic Membrane Perforations
  • Etiology
  • Middle ear infections.
  • EAC infections.
  • Blunt Trauma.
  • Iatrogenic.

5
Risk factors for Re-perforation
  • Large perforation (Lee P 2002)
  • 56 success vs. 74 in small perf
  • Anterior location (Bhat NA 2000)
  • 67 success vs. 90 in posterior perf
  • Disease in contralateral ear (Ophir D 1987)
  • Otorrhea during surgery (Lau T 1986)
  • Middle ear mucosa status (Albu S 1998)
  • Smoking (Becvaroski Z 2001)

6
Age and Success of Cartilage Tympanoplasty
Albera et al, 2006 EBM III
7
Graft Materials
  • Fascia
  • Perichondrium
  • Vein
  • Dura
  • Skin
  • Cartilage

8
Why Cartilage?
  • Fascia and perichondrium undergo atrophy
  • Skin graft Infection
  • Cartilage
  • More rigid and resist resorption
  • Good long-term survival
  • Nourished largely by diffusion

9
Mucosal Traction Theory
  • Mucosal layers of TM and middle ear linings
    undergo constant migration
  • ETD creates the initial retraction and contact
    between mucosa of TM and ossicles
  • If mucosa of TM and ossicles are coupled by
    mucous or fibrous adhesions, migratory forces
    pull mucosa towards the incus
  • Mucosal traction plays a stronger role than
    Eustachian tube dysfunction in forming
    cholesteatoma

Jackler Otology Update 2006 EBM V
10
Indications for Cartilage Tympanoplasty
  • Atelectatic ear
  • Retraction pocket/ Cholesteatoma
  • High Risk Perforation
  • Revision
  • Anterior perforation
  • gt 50
  • Otorrhea at the time of surgery
  • Bilateral

11
Techniques
  • Perichondrium/ Cartilage island flap
  • Tragal cartilage
  • Cartilage shield technique
  • Conchal cartilage
  • Palisade technique
  • Tragal cartilage
  • Concha cymba
  • Inlay Butterfly graft
  • Tragal cartilage

12
Inlay Butterfly Graft
  • Originally designed for small perforation
  • (lt 1/3 TM diameter) myringoplasty without
    cholesteatoma
  • Inlay technique without elevation of
    tympanomeatal flap
  • Quick office procedure
  • Expanded recently to repair larger perforations
    in conjunction with mastoidectomy
  • Split thickness skin graft over perichondrium for
    large perforation

13
Inlay Butterfly Graft
Eavey RD 1998
14
Placement of Butterfly graft
Eavey RD 1998
15
Postop Inlay Butterfly graft
Eavey RD 1998
16
Inlay graft for large perforation
Ghanem MA 2006
17
Tragal Cartilage Harvest
  • Cut on medial side of tragus
  • Leave 2 mm tragal cartilage for cosmesis
  • Abundance 15 x 10 mm
  • Flat
  • 1 mm thickness
  • Perichondrium from the side away from the EAC is
    removed

Dornhoffer 2003
18
Perichondrium/ Cartilage Graft
Dornhoffer 2003
19
Medial Grafting
Dornhoffer 2003
20
Postop Perichondrium/ Cartilage Island Graft
Dornhoffer 2003
21
Cartilage Shield
Aidonis I 2005
22
Cartilage Shield
23
Palisade technique
  • This technique is favored when OCR is performed
    in malleus-present situation
  • Cartilage from either tragus or cymba
  • Post-auricular Cymba
  • Transcanal Tragus

Dornhoffer 2003
24
Conchal Cartilage Graft
25
Palisade techniques
26
Preparation of Cartilage Strips
Kazikdas KC 2007
27
Palisade technique
Anderson J et al. Otol Neurotol. 2004
28
Palisade Postop result
29
Modified Palisade technique
Murbe D 2002
30
Postop care
  • 2 weeks postop Gelfoam completely suctioned from
    EAC
  • Start topical antibiotics x 2 weeks
  • Adult Start valsalva
  • Children Otovent TID
  • 3-4 months Audiogram
  • Air bone gap
  • Tympanogram no longer reliable. Type B tymp
    despite normal hearing

31
Criticisms of Cartilage T-plasty
  • Time consuming to shape cartilage
  • Opaque - Difficulty in surveillance
  • Rigidity of cartilage raises concern about
    audiologic outcome

32
Effect of TM perforation on Hearing
  • Diminished surface area on which sound pressure
    can exert
  • Decreased area effect of TM stapes footplate
    (normally 171)
  • ? dampening of lever action of the ossicular
    chain
  • Sound reaching round window at same intensity and
    phase as oval window ? cancelling fluid
    vibration in cochlear
  • Sound pressure entering the perforation acts on
    the medial surface of the TM against that on the
    lateral surface

33
Hearing Results Dornhoffer et al.
  • 95 patients who failed at least 1 temporalis
    fascia graft tympanoplasty
  • 29 required OCR
  • Avg f/u 12 months
  • 90/95 (94.7) with successful TM closure
  • Pediatric group has similar success rate as
    adults
  • PTA (p lt 0.001)
  • Preop 24.6
  • Postop 12.2

EBM III
34
Hearing Results Gerber 2000
  • 11 patients
  • 2 groups Cartilage vs. temporalis fascia
  • Intact ossicular chain
  • Size of graft 1/3 2/3 of mesotympanum
  • Tragal cartilage island graft (10), conchal (1)
  • Primary indication Retraction pocket
  • Post-auricular or transcanal
  • Average f/u 12 months

EBM III
35
Hearing Results Gerber 2000
36
Hearing Results Gerber 2000
37
Thickness of Cartilage graft
Murbe D 2002
38
Acoustic Properties
39
Management of Middle ear effusion postop
  • Appearance of TM
  • Air-bone gap on audiogram
  • CT temporal bone
  • Initial treatment
  • Nasal steroids
  • Valsalva
  • 3 months
  • Surgical treatment
  • Myringotomy (eg. CO2 laser)
  • Tympanostomy tube (eg. soft Goode tube)

40
Pediatric patients
  • Avoid T-plasty lt 3 years
  • Repair at age 4
  • If contralateral ear is perforated, perform
    adenoidectomy and defer until age 7
  • Cartilage tympanoplasty in the worst ear

41
High Risk perforation
  • Account for 1/3 cases of cartilage tympanoplasty
  • gt 95 successful closure of TM after cartilage
    t-plasty
  • 5 requires postop MT
  • Hearing results comparable to fascia graft

42
Ossicular Chain Reconstruction
  • Cartilage reinforces prosthesis to prevent
    extrusion
  • When malleus is present
  • Palisade technique over island flap (obscure
    malleus and reconstruction)
  • When malleus is absent
  • Tragal cartilage island flap

43
Cartilage T-plasty with TORP
44
Cholesteatoma
  • Palisade technique preferred
  • Allow precise placement of prosthesis against the
    malleus
  • Leave anterior TM without cartilage to allow
    surveillance and future tube placement
  • Consider 2nd look if sac disrupted during initial
    cholesteatoma excision

45
Pervasive Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
  • Criteria for intraoperative tube placement
  • Craniofacial abnormalities
  • Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  • Recurrent otitis media with ETD
  • Round knife used to create a window in the
    anterior graft
  • Goode tube placed prior to insetting the graft

46
Conclusions
  • Cartilage tympanoplasty is a reliable technique
    in reconstruction of TM
  • Hearing results after cartilage tympanoplasty is
    comparable to temporalis fascia graft
  • Choice of techniques depend on surgeons
    preference, status of ossicular chain,
    Eutstachian tube, presence of cholesteatoma, etc.

47
Thank You!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com